hmm?
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Laurel, MD,
If you mean a "pod and boom" type construction, then the answer is "it depends". I know, not very useful, but can you give more information about what you are looking for? With out a more specific description of what you are doing, it's not easy to tell.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Seeing as how we're talking about a broomstick for a fuselage and this low tech approach is just that, low tech, I would look at the wingspan to length ratio for a bunch of similar looking planes from a few manufacturers on the web and use an average of that.
Shorter fuselage to wingspan ratio will yield higher to unmanageable pitch responses, depending on how radical you get and longer will result in dampened to sluggish pitch response.
BTW, your instrests would be better served by posting your question in the Aerodynamics section.
Good Luck!!
Shorter fuselage to wingspan ratio will yield higher to unmanageable pitch responses, depending on how radical you get and longer will result in dampened to sluggish pitch response.
BTW, your instrests would be better served by posting your question in the Aerodynamics section.
Good Luck!!




yeah, that sounds good
