Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Pulse XT Classification >

Pulse XT Classification

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Pulse XT Classification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2014 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lake County, CA
Default Pulse XT Classification

I thought the H9 Pulse XT was an aerobatic plane.
With its flat bottom wing with dihedral, I'm not so sure.
Those who have one, do you consider it an aerobat or a sport flyer?

Thanks,
KW_Counter
Old 05-06-2014 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Reading, UNITED KINGDOM
Default

It is more a sport flyer. It does fly very well but is limited
Old 05-06-2014 | 07:38 PM
  #3  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default

Well it seems Horizon considers it a sport flyer, I just checked their website and nowhere do they use the term aerobat. Actually it the whole idea that an airplane has to fit into some rigid "classification" is pointless. Whether or not any airplane is 'aerobatic' is just a matter of the individuals perception that it is.

Its a low wing airplane a totally flat wing on a low wing ship would be terrible. Concerning aerobatics some of the very best of the low wing airplanes that I have flown (there has been my share of those) All used dihedral. Some of the very worst low wing airplanes that I have flown had a flat wing. Some of the very best high wing airplanes I have flown used considerable anhedral agine a flat wing is only half way there to that totally neutral roll stability.

So although I do not have one I do believe there will be just as many folks who 'perceive' it to be an aerobat as there are folks whose perception of it is as a 'sport flyer'. Heck I have been guilty of lumping the two together anyway.


John
Old 05-06-2014 | 08:44 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,087
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Over da rainbow, KS
Default

It really depends on how you set up the airplane. Moving the CG back and increasing throws will make it very agile. Moving the CG forward and decreasing throws will make it docile.

The amount of dihedral used depends on the type of flying the design is intended to do. For a neutral airplane (no roll coupling with rudder), a low wing needs dihedral, and shoulder wing may be flat, and a high wing might require anhedral. If you remove the dihedral from a low wing design, you quite often end up with an airplane that rolls left when right rudder is used. This is known as adverse roll.

Most full size airplane are designed with some dihedral effect so that a low wing can be picked up with rudder. This is to give some redundancy to the controls, for instance you can fly the aircraft with just elevator trim incase the elevator gets disconnected from the control stick.
Old 05-07-2014 | 06:20 AM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,266
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

You can do aerobatics with it. You'll have some deficiencies in knife edge flight and your verticals probably won't be perfect, but there is no reason you can't do novice and sporstman class maneuvers from the SPA schedules with a Pulse.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.