Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 40 or 46 Engine? >

40 or 46 Engine?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

40 or 46 Engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2004 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Golden, CO
Default 40 or 46 Engine?

Hi,

I've got a bran new OS 40 that a friend never used but no plane yet. I live in Denver and I've heard that many of the flyers around here fly with a 46 when a 40 is recommended. I'm looking at getting a Kadet LT-40, do you think I should look at a smaller plane with this engine or just get a larger engine for this plane. Or do you think the engine I have should be fine?

Thanks,

Mike
Old 02-23-2004 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
FLYBOY's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,076
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Missoula, MT
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

I think you will be fine with that plane and engine combo. Build it light and don't worry about it. That way you save on the engine. It will work fine.
Old 02-23-2004 | 06:45 PM
  #3  
staggerwing's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dun Rovin Ranch, WY
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

You didn't say which OS .40 you have. There is a big difference between a .40 LA and a .40 FX.

If it is a .40 LA at your atlitude you will not be happy with the .40 LA and LT-40 combination. Our club uses LT-40's as trainers with an assortment of OS .40's and .46's and we are at 6000'. The .40 LA trainers fly but not well. The .40 FX trainer is passable. The trainers with the .46 FX are really the best. Stay with the LT-40 but get yourself a .46 if you can.
Old 02-23-2004 | 07:01 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

Why not just look at a smaller plane? A Tower Trainer .40 kit is $45.00. That engine would probably pull that airplane around pretty well. You could also put it on an LT25. I watched a guy fly one with a .40 on it yesterday and it seemed to fly fine. My LT40 is almost done and it is a big plane. I'm putting a .46 on it. Not that I'm an expert but I think I'll be glad for the extra ponies in this plane.
Old 02-23-2004 | 07:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Battle Ground, WA,
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

I built the Lt40 from kit and flew it with the .46Fx no problem, then tried the .32 Fabc OS and it again flew very well. The .32 and 40 LA are about same in power, however the elevation here approaches nose bleed country at about 300 feet msl. Use a much lower pitch prop, like 10 by 4 or 11 by 4, and you should have a ball.
Old 02-23-2004 | 09:05 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Golden, CO
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

The engine reads: OS 40 FP but I can't find any other markings. I assume this was the older version of the FX?

Thanks for everyone's replies!

Mike
Old 02-23-2004 | 10:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

Actually that is the precursor to the LA. Much less plastic and better looking in my opinion.
Old 02-24-2004 | 12:43 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Drouin, Victoria, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

the 40FP was a great engine, not super powerfull but reliable as they come, all things being equal it should fly most of the 40 size trainers fine.
Old 02-24-2004 | 08:11 AM
  #9  
jettstarblue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ashtabula county, OH
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

O.S. FP .40 + any .40 trainer = plenty of power!

Jetts
Old 02-24-2004 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
MinnFlyer's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Willmar, MN
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

ORIGINAL: jettstarblue

O.S. FP .40 + any .40 trainer = plenty of power!

Jetts
Usually, yes. I don't know how well it will work at your altitude though.

I would get the LT40, and plan on the possibility of an engine upgrade (You'll want to do it eventually anyway)
Old 02-24-2004 | 10:55 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (197)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Minnetonka, MN
Default RE: 40 or 46 Engine?

I second getting the LT 40 and considering a future engine upgrade. I started out with an LT 40 that had one of the old K&B 40's. It had less power than a os40la. I was fine with that combo. I live in Minneapolis, and elevation is not a problem. Once I became comfortable with the plane, I installed a MDS 48 ball bearing engine and it was like an upgraded plane.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.