size versus scale?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tustin,
CA
when an ARF is described as .40, .60 or 1.50, what exactly does that mean or refer to?
how do they correspond to various "scales" (i.e. 1/5, 1/6, etc.) that I see many references to?
thanks for the info,
how do they correspond to various "scales" (i.e. 1/5, 1/6, etc.) that I see many references to?
thanks for the info,
#3

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Windsor,
CT
A 1/6th scale P51 might require a .46 cu in size engine whereas a 1/6 scale Piper Cub might require an .15 cu in. Usually a kit will have both designations as well as wingspan, length, wing area and wing loading. After you have been in the hobby for a while all you need is a couple of those pieces of information and if you are familliar with the airplane style you can guess at the rest pretty well.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Up north,
ND
in general, and this is really stretching it at best, .40 is about 15% scale, and 1.20 is usually about quarter scale. that said, there isn't much correlation and it depends on the plane more than anything else. (a 1.20 scale bomber isn't exactly 25%!!)



