Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Reload this Page >

Best Second (But ARF)

Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Best Second (But ARF)

Old 04-28-2004, 03:03 PM
  #1  
Flyin_High
Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: *, ON, CANADA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Best Second (But ARF)

I was just wondering what would be the best second plane as an ARF. I was seriously looking into the SIG 4*, but it is a kit, and I won't have the time this summer to build it (maybe this winter though). Anyways, do you guys have any ideas?
Old 04-28-2004, 03:20 PM
  #2  
FHHuber
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: gone,
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

The 4*40 is now available as an ARF.

The Tiger II is very similar... a little heavier wing loading and tricycle gear, and is also available as either ARF or kit.

Either makes a great second airplane.

You should also look at the wide assortment of "Stick" models. (Ulta-Stick, Big Stick, Little Stick... lots of "sticks") These are very good second airplanes also.

Stick with the baskic "hershey bar" shaped wing planform. Dihedral is nice but not necessary. Don't get one with too short of a fuselage (Somthin' Extra) unless you are THOUROUGHLY pushing the aerobatic limit of your trainer. If you get the Ultra-Stick... then you will want to use close to the "low rate" control throws as your high rates until you get used to the aircraft. (especially the elevator)
Old 04-28-2004, 03:36 PM
  #3  
hookedonrc
 
hookedonrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 2,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

My second plane was a 4*60 ARF with an OS91 Surpass on it. I did have to make some mods to the ARF but for the most part it was not that difficult. BTW: I still love flying it.
Old 04-28-2004, 03:47 PM
  #4  
Felix21685
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

keep the gp easy sport in mind i have it and love it
Felix
Old 04-28-2004, 03:50 PM
  #5  
charlied123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

If you are looking for a high wing the World Star 40 from world models is great. It's got the durability of a trainer but no dihedral so it does a great job with beginning aerobatics. It also has flaps. It's built to take punishement and usually sells for $99.00.

If you want low wing the World Model Super Sports 40 is even better for the same price.
There are alot of great ARFs but these two are a good value for what they offer.

Good luck and have fun!

Charlie
Old 04-28-2004, 04:27 PM
  #6  
a65l
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
a65l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: va veach, VA
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

My vote for the WM SS 40. Excellent choice for second plane, not to hard to assemble, good hardware, is available as non-cowled, or cowled, depends on wether you want to tackle an inverted engine or not. Could use a couple $$ worth of improvement parts, but canm be built great out of teh box.
A great flying, ez to handle plane.

Andy
Old 04-28-2004, 05:17 PM
  #7  
MinnFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
MinnFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

GP Easy Sport, or Midwest Aerobat
Old 04-28-2004, 05:32 PM
  #8  
Chris-_-Memphis
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Chris-_-Memphis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

do a search on RCU for second plane.. 555,555,555,555 threads discussing this topic
Old 04-28-2004, 06:37 PM
  #9  
BingoFlyer
Senior Member
 
BingoFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

I would look at one of Doc. Mathews planes, either the Bingo or the 4-60 (note not the star). I'm not sure if they are still available as a kit but RCM has the plans and they are both very easy to build from plans.

The 4-60 is a shoulder wing using a simi-symmetrical and was designed for a four stroke sixty sized engine (4-60) also as a 4-40 but not as good as the 60.

The Bingo uses the same wing plane but is a low wing with larger control surfaces, it will fly very well with a 4 stroke 60 but I use an OS.91 Surpass.

Both are easy to fly but will do many more maneuvers than a trainer. Ace used to kit these models but haven't in a while you may still find one. I like them because you will likely be the only one at the field with either.
Old 04-28-2004, 07:09 PM
  #10  
TexAg78
Senior Member
 
TexAg78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX,
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Easy Sport

Easy Sport would be my choice. I've had both an Easy Sport and a Sig 4*40. Easy Sport is definitely a better second plane in my mind. It's a bit larger and easier to see, and it lands much easier.
Old 04-28-2004, 08:05 PM
  #11  
DBCherry
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hubbardston, MA
Posts: 5,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

I have always recommended the Great Planes Super Sportster, which makes a good second plane (it was my second). I recently bought a 4* 40 because so many people have been recommending them, and I now agree that it too would be a good second plane.

The 4* doesn't handle wind quite as well as the sportster, but it flys equally well. (The Sportster ARF is about $140 now, the 4* is somewaht less.) These are both tail draggers.

I also recently got to fly a Goldberg Tiger 2 and found that to be an excellent flying plane, and I'd be willing to recommend it as a second too. Handles wind as well as the Sportster, and lands a bit faster than the 4*, but still a good choice. I just saw the Tiger 2 ARF at Tower for $99. The Tiger has tricycle gear.

Good luck,
Dennis-
Old 04-28-2004, 10:41 PM
  #12  
Carlos Murphy
My Feedback: (72)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

The 4* 40, 60 and Spacewalker type's are easy to fly but can be harder to land than a trainer do to their tendency to "float". A very good second plane would be the World T-34 Mentor (40-46).
Set on low rates it is gentle and positive to fly but on high rates, it comes alive with crisp aileron rolls and big loops and with the nose wheel adjusted to provide negitive angel of attack on the wing you can do high speed landings.
Old 04-29-2004, 02:15 AM
  #13  
forestroke
Senior Member
 
forestroke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Taipei, TAIWAN
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

I agree with a65l, the WM SS40 is one of the best flying planes. If you are looking for a semi scale, the WM T-34 is also very nice.

As for me, I think the WM Ramber 30 is the sweetest flying plane... I have two and I don't have two of anything! I have the Ramber red interlaid with blue and it's beautiful, Running a 52 fourstroke mounted 90 degrees. Beautiful...
Old 04-29-2004, 10:58 AM
  #14  
flyerdarren
Senior Member
 
flyerdarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: kaisersluatern
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

ORIGINAL: MinnFlyer

GP Easy Sport, or Midwest Aerobat
I'll second the Aerobat, I love that plane, it flies great and lands even better. Only problem I had with it were the engine mounting screws that came with the kit. They were kinda weak.
Old 04-29-2004, 12:00 PM
  #15  
Jumpnjoe
Member
 
Jumpnjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Best Second (But ARF)

I also recommend th Midwest Aerobat. Great flying 2nd plane, lands slow, looks nice, etc. I "thought" the engine mounting bolts were kinda weak too, compared to my trainer's, but I found out when I nosed into the runway full throttle (radio/receiver interference), and my engine mount broke, that those small screws aren't going anywhere. They don't look strong, but they are.

I'm rambling now...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.