CG for newbie
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
G'day guys,
Just getting my first plane ready for a lesson.
I've got a Vmar Apache III with an OS 46FX engine using a JR-X378(I intend on only buying one radio)
My question is, What's the best method of measuring the CG?
I notice the manual shows the CG just below the cabin on the fuselage.
Should I use my finger tips on the tips of the wing? Or how about a ruler under the fuselage?
Maybe using my fingertips at the point shown in the manual?
Any thoughts on the best method? I don't have a CG rig of any sort.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
Just getting my first plane ready for a lesson.
I've got a Vmar Apache III with an OS 46FX engine using a JR-X378(I intend on only buying one radio)
My question is, What's the best method of measuring the CG?
I notice the manual shows the CG just below the cabin on the fuselage.
Should I use my finger tips on the tips of the wing? Or how about a ruler under the fuselage?
Maybe using my fingertips at the point shown in the manual?
Any thoughts on the best method? I don't have a CG rig of any sort.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
#2
You can most likely get it close enough if you use your fingers under the wing root at the point shown in the manual. I made a simple balancing jig by drilling two holes in a board a little wider than the fuselage, and putting a dowel with the end rounded off in each hole. I then marked the desired cg location on the bottom of the wing (you can use a piece of tape, or a magic marker, etc.) and balanced on that. I’ve used the same jig on several models with good results.
The ruler under the fuselage, while good in theory, is far too sensitive. Because the cg is well above the ruler, it will fall one way or the other unless it is perfectly balanced. For a trainer with dihedral, the fingers under the wing tips is not nearly sensitive enough. Because the cg is well below the tips, the cg can be off a good bit and the model will still hang pretty level. With the support at the wing root, the sensitivity is about right.
If the cg is not pretty close, try to move it by moving the battery rather than adding weight. If that doesn’t bring it in, adding a little weight won’t have much effect on performance of a trainer.
The ruler under the fuselage, while good in theory, is far too sensitive. Because the cg is well above the ruler, it will fall one way or the other unless it is perfectly balanced. For a trainer with dihedral, the fingers under the wing tips is not nearly sensitive enough. Because the cg is well below the tips, the cg can be off a good bit and the model will still hang pretty level. With the support at the wing root, the sensitivity is about right.
If the cg is not pretty close, try to move it by moving the battery rather than adding weight. If that doesn’t bring it in, adding a little weight won’t have much effect on performance of a trainer.
#3

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pointe Claire,
QC, CANADA
Antoher method, which I've used, is two pencils (unused, with the rubber erasers) shoved in two drilled holes (typcially just under 1/4") in a board. Make teh board large enoug not to tip over when teh plane is placed on them. Voila! on cheap balancing stand. Drill them into your benchtop if you so desire!
Make teh holes as close as possible to the fuse, while allowing the plane to sit freely.
Another method, if pencils are too short, is to use 1/4" wood dowels (cut to an appropriate length), with the'after market' pencil end erasers in teh ends.
Make teh holes as close as possible to the fuse, while allowing the plane to sit freely.
Another method, if pencils are too short, is to use 1/4" wood dowels (cut to an appropriate length), with the'after market' pencil end erasers in teh ends.



