Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Pete n' Poke >

Pete n' Poke

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Pete n' Poke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2002 | 03:02 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Venezuela
Default Pete n' Poke

Pete n Poke anyone with experience on this one (.40) from Great Planes? I Just got it as a second airplane. Warnings, take offs, landings, building, engine?
Old 08-06-2002 | 10:26 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Whitby, ON, CANADA
Default Pete n' Poke

I haven't started mine as yet but from what I've researched (I do far too much research), you will require an incidence meter when building the cabane struts.

I picked up a Saito .56 for mine.

Nuker
Old 08-06-2002 | 12:09 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Johnstown, PA
Default Pete n' Poke

The textbook answer is to use an incidence meter -- and I do use one. On the subject of the incidence meter, however, I build a lot of airplanes (not just one or two a year: sometimes more than a couple a month) so to me the incidence meter is worth way more than the $3 I paid for it at a swap meet. For a beginner who may only build one or two planes in the next year or two, the $25 to $35 retail that the meter will probably cost may be a bit expensive.

As it turns out, a bullet level ($2 to $4 from Sears or any home improvement store) is not a bad tool to have. Geometry will tell you that to get the 1 degree incidence needed, you can support your fuselage such that the stab is level, then set the wing support rails so that they're level side to side and dropped about 1/16" in the front (check the plans for an exact measurement: you should be quite exact on this one). Not really too much magic involved at all... just make sure that the fuselage is held in place firmly when you do this (regarless of whether you use an incidence meter or a level).
Old 08-06-2002 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Whitby, ON, CANADA
Default Pete n' Poke

Hey Al,

that's a pretty neat idea. I sure don't build 2 models a month (not and stay married anyway ) To help defray the cost of the meter a good buddy and I split the cost. Once folks found out we had it, we end up sharing with other club members. We don't all need it at once anyway. I'm sure if obstretix asks around at his club, there will probably be someone there glad to lend one for a weekend. Just one of the benefits being in a club I guess and the worse that can happen is that no one has one.

Just another option (though I had never considered the level before, sounds quite easy; might play with that this weekend now that you got me curious )

Nuker
Old 08-06-2002 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Johnstown, PA
Default Pete n' Poke

Borrowing is a good way to go... My incidence meter does spend much more time sleeping on a shelf than it spends measuring airplanes. Probably everybody knows somebody who's got one and rarely uses it.

They do come up at swap meets for cheap fairly often. I saw one this spring for under $5 and I'm sorry I didn't get it (two would be great for checking wash-in/wash-out and twist between wing panels). They're like building jigs -- most people just never get into using them. (I got great prices for my building jigs at swap meets, too!)
Old 08-06-2002 | 10:52 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Venezuela
Default Pete n' Poke

Great!. My brother is an engineer and so we spent a couple of hours making geometrical calculations and we ended up building some kind of trapezoid that will do the job (or so he believes, I am an obstetrician, not at all good in math). Anyone has flown this one besides building it?. I will use a OS .46 LA. But I am considering buying a 46FX or something else (bigger perhaps)
Old 08-06-2002 | 11:11 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Whitby, ON, CANADA
Default Pete n' Poke

There was a review on it 2 months ago; I believe in was in RCM. Test flights were with a .46 FX. From what I remember they can be squirely on the ground but fly rather docile. You might want to see if you can get a copy from a club member to read.

Nuker
Old 08-06-2002 | 11:48 PM
  #8  
tailskid's Avatar
My Feedback: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,554
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Mobile, AL
Default Pete n' Poke

I flew mine off grass so ground handling wasn't a problem.

It is a very gentle flying bird that doesn't like the inverted position

Lot of building if I remember correctly.....also R/C Report had a review of it about 2 years back...

Jerry

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.