Range for Radio Control
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Payson,
AZ
Usually much farther than you can determine the orientation of the model. It's strictly line of sight. You can fly so far out that you can't tell which direction the airplane is traveling or if it's upside down or which direction you are turning. 1,000' is a long way out.
#5
Senior Member
Most transmitters put out the same amount of power. The range is determined more by the recievers sensitivity, usually not stated in the literature. This is usually in microvolts per meter and can vary considerably between manufacturers. Many of the less expensive park flyer types have poor sensitivity (probably intentional to prevent interferance between nearby locations) which limit range to a 100 yards or so. A typical Futaba, Airtronics, JR etc. is much better, usually in the range of a mile or two under ideal conditions. There are really two items of interest, sensitivity as described above and selectivity which is defined as ability to seperate the desired frequency from any nearby interferance usually stated as bandwidth selectivity.
#6
Senior Member
I highly doubt you can control a plane 2 miles out. I have seen planes lost because it was out of range, usually about only 1 kilometer or so (about 0.6 of a mile). Again, a RX will have more range if its straighter up than farther out.
#8

My Feedback: (3)
I'm curious, too.
But to respond to the original question, there are frequency sharing agreements which indicate safety from interference beyond 3 miles. That's two fields, 3 miles apart, not affecting each other. One might make some assumptions here, and say that at a mile and a half, one transmitter could contol its plane, while a similar transmitter at the other field couldn't. I think that assumption would be flawed.
I expect the control capability drops off rapidly beyond a half mile or so. Not that I would ever fly that far away! I can't see it well at a quarter mile!
Good luck,
Dave Olson
But to respond to the original question, there are frequency sharing agreements which indicate safety from interference beyond 3 miles. That's two fields, 3 miles apart, not affecting each other. One might make some assumptions here, and say that at a mile and a half, one transmitter could contol its plane, while a similar transmitter at the other field couldn't. I think that assumption would be flawed.
I expect the control capability drops off rapidly beyond a half mile or so. Not that I would ever fly that far away! I can't see it well at a quarter mile!
Good luck,
Dave Olson
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Up north,
ND
ORIGINAL: Mighty Mouse-RCU
tIANci
Courious in why a receiver would have greater range straight up from the transmitter than further out. Just trying to learn.
tIANci
Courious in why a receiver would have greater range straight up from the transmitter than further out. Just trying to learn.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: coal township, PA
Under labratory conditions the max limit is 5 miles. As I remember of the FCC rules for hobby transmitters. In real life 1/2 to 1 1/2 miles is max in the real world numbers.
Mark Shuman
Mark Shuman




