What's the difference? Four-Star or Somethin' Extra
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cedar Park, TX
I'm looking at building a kit over the holidays, and I was wondering: What's the difference between the SIG 4* and the Somethin' Extra?
From the pictures on Tower Hobbies they look very similar. Any comments on the differences?
Thanks,
Tycho
From the pictures on Tower Hobbies they look very similar. Any comments on the differences?
Thanks,
Tycho
#2

My Feedback: (3)
For the beginner, the Four-Star is capable of a bit less demanding flight, although some would argue the SE is quite easy to fly, too, when set up for it.
For the experienced aerobatic flyer, the SE is capable of a bit faster rolls and tighter loops, if that's what is desired.
For someone with an eye on pattern competition, the Four-Star might provide smoother pattern maneuvers. For the 3-D aspirant, the SE might come closer to performing in that fashion.
However, you've asked about two fine examples of planes, both fairly easy to build and sturdy. Pleasing to the eye, too.
What did you have in mind?
Good luck,
Dave Olson
For the experienced aerobatic flyer, the SE is capable of a bit faster rolls and tighter loops, if that's what is desired.
For someone with an eye on pattern competition, the Four-Star might provide smoother pattern maneuvers. For the 3-D aspirant, the SE might come closer to performing in that fashion.
However, you've asked about two fine examples of planes, both fairly easy to build and sturdy. Pleasing to the eye, too.
What did you have in mind?
Good luck,
Dave Olson
#3

My Feedback: (32)
ORIGINAL: Scar
For the beginner, the Four-Star is capable of a bit less demanding flight, although some would argue the SE is quite easy to fly, too, when set up for it.
For the experienced aerobatic flyer, the SE is capable of a bit faster rolls and tighter loops, if that's what is desired.
For someone with an eye on pattern competition, the Four-Star might provide smoother pattern maneuvers. For the 3-D aspirant, the SE might come closer to performing in that fashion.
However, you've asked about two fine examples of planes, both fairly easy to build and sturdy. Pleasing to the eye, too.
What did you have in mind?
Good luck,
Dave Olson
For the beginner, the Four-Star is capable of a bit less demanding flight, although some would argue the SE is quite easy to fly, too, when set up for it.
For the experienced aerobatic flyer, the SE is capable of a bit faster rolls and tighter loops, if that's what is desired.
For someone with an eye on pattern competition, the Four-Star might provide smoother pattern maneuvers. For the 3-D aspirant, the SE might come closer to performing in that fashion.
However, you've asked about two fine examples of planes, both fairly easy to build and sturdy. Pleasing to the eye, too.
What did you have in mind?
Good luck,
Dave Olson
Semi-symetrical wing
small control surfaces
tough as nails
SSE: I have about 60 flights on mine
Fully semtrical wing
Large control surfaces
Tough as nails
I own and fly both. The 4* is more for learning pattern work and makes a great low wing 2nd airplane. Will modifications it can roll pretty fast (chop a bay off each wing when you build it) Add to the rudder and elevator and use a 46 2 stroke or a Saito 56 4 stroke. The 2 stroke will fly it faster but the 4 stroke will allow it to pull like a tractor
I agree about the description of the SSE with one exception. On high rates (book throws) you will lose count quickly when you roll it. It's a good plane for precision if you use good throttle management. It will do mild 3D and everything else you can think up. It also flys very well on a 46 2 stroke but again throttle management is a must. It also makes a good second plane if you keep the rates low
Both land extremely slow and much better than most all trainers
Both kits go together well.
There is an old saying on SIG kits, open the box, drop in a bottle of CA, close the box and shake for a few minutes, now open the box and out will pop a plane.
#6
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cedar Park, TX
Thanks for the clarifications.
I started flying in May with my H9 Arrow trainer. I can fly it pretty good by now, and have no problem doing the whole sportsman pattern as well as inverted flight.
Right now I'm in the process of moving the radio and the engine (once back from being repaired) over to a Sky Raider Mach II. I'm going to use it as a cheap 2nd plane to get used to a low wing tail dragger.
I also have a third model on it's way. The tracking# says is should arrive tomorrow.
It's a Venus 40 with a Magnum XLS-52. My plan was to get some stick time with the cheap Sky Raider before I try out the new Venus 40.
So, the 4* or the SSE would actually be my fourth model by then. Given the descriptions above I think I will go for the SSN since the Venus should be a pretty good plane for learning pattern.
-tycho
I started flying in May with my H9 Arrow trainer. I can fly it pretty good by now, and have no problem doing the whole sportsman pattern as well as inverted flight.
Right now I'm in the process of moving the radio and the engine (once back from being repaired) over to a Sky Raider Mach II. I'm going to use it as a cheap 2nd plane to get used to a low wing tail dragger.
I also have a third model on it's way. The tracking# says is should arrive tomorrow.
It's a Venus 40 with a Magnum XLS-52. My plan was to get some stick time with the cheap Sky Raider before I try out the new Venus 40.So, the 4* or the SSE would actually be my fourth model by then. Given the descriptions above I think I will go for the SSN since the Venus should be a pretty good plane for learning pattern.
-tycho



