Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Hangar 9 T-34 >

Hangar 9 T-34

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Hangar 9 T-34

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2005 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
colibri-flyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 36
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
From: the Netherlands
Default Hangar 9 T-34

HI,
I don't know for sure if there is an other thread about this subject but anyway, I'm thinking of buying the Hangar 9 T-34 Mentor, and my question was; what's the best engine I could use? I don't have to have the cheapest engine or the most expensive one, just the best
Old 07-30-2005 | 03:44 PM
  #2  
joesabido's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MeridaYucatan, MEXICO
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Well, my guess is that it "MUST" be a 4-stroke, maybe a saito 82 or saito 100
Old 07-30-2005 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
tailskid's Avatar
My Feedback: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,554
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Mobile, AL
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

I used a Saito 72 and it handled well - and flew scale-like.

Jerry
Old 08-01-2005 | 10:34 AM
  #4  
colibri-flyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 36
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
From: the Netherlands
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Thanks for the advise, but what would be the best engine to preserve the scale looks? Maybe a two-stroke with in-cowl muffler or a 4-stroke with flexible exhaust?
Old 08-01-2005 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
joesabido's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MeridaYucatan, MEXICO
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Well, for scale SOUND you might wanna go 4-stroke, for looks you could mount the engine inverted and use a Slimline Inverted Pitts muffler, and cut the outlets almost flush with the cowl
Old 08-01-2005 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Little Rock, AR
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

I have this plane and its one of my favorites. I have a Saito 72 in mine and it flies super. I don't think there is anyway to hide everything under the cowl because of the nosegear rails and equipment. The best way seems to be side mounted with the exhast down through the bottom with an extender.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ig12631.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	95.7 KB
ID:	304323   Click image for larger version

Name:	Av67838.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	21.4 KB
ID:	304324  
Old 08-01-2005 | 02:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colbert, WA
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

On the two stroke side, I flew mine with a Magnum .46 XLS. Plenty of power, flew well at 50-60% of throttle, take off run of 200' or so on a not-so-smooth runway.

I side mounted the engine, and routed openings in the cowl for the cylinder head and muffler. I also don't think it's possible to completely enclose the engine/muffler for a total scale look because of the landing gear set up. Unless, of course, you're talking about going electric.

Another thing that I'd do: use a metal clevis on both the elevator and rudder control linkage. The elevator uses a metal torque rod, and I think it abraided the nylon pin in the H9 supplied clevis until it broke. Unfortunately, this was at the top of a loop. The vertical dive from 200' up was breathtaking, but the sudden stop at the end kind of ruined my day.
Old 08-01-2005 | 06:25 PM
  #8  
joesabido's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MeridaYucatan, MEXICO
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Ouch man, sounds painfull [:@][&:]
Old 08-02-2005 | 12:59 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colbert, WA
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Yeah, it was, especially in my left rear pocket!
Old 08-02-2005 | 01:48 PM
  #10  
joesabido's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MeridaYucatan, MEXICO
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Damn wallets, they can't stand the heat [8D]
Old 08-03-2005 | 03:00 AM
  #11  
colibri-flyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 36
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
From: the Netherlands
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

lol, anyway I think I'll go for the 4-stroke. They sound a lot better than 2-strokes and they have a magnificent idle.
Old 08-03-2005 | 04:12 AM
  #12  
joesabido's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: MeridaYucatan, MEXICO
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

Great choice colibri-flyer, you won't be disapointed, but keep in mind that 4-strokes are SOMETIMES harder to tune than a 2-stroke.

Just so you won't say no one told ya

Good luck
Old 08-04-2005 | 04:44 AM
  #13  
colibri-flyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 36
Received 17 Likes on 4 Posts
From: the Netherlands
Default RE: Hangar 9 T-34

OK thanks for the advise

I have some experience with four-strokes and they ARE more diffcult to tune.I have the Saito FA-90R3 3-cylinder radial and that was very very hard to tune.

But it works fine now.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.