Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
.46fx in a 4*? >

.46fx in a 4*?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

.46fx in a 4*?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2002 | 11:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
Default .46fx in a 4*?

Right now I'm flying a pt-40, and i would eventully like to get into scale(TF .60 P-47). I'm thinking about building a sig mid or 4 star, and i'm wondering if my .46fx would be to big. I'm also wondering if these planes would be good to ease into flying warbirds with. TIA, Brendan.
Old 11-30-2002 | 11:46 PM
  #2  
GrnBrt's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,988
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Everett, WA
Default .46fx in a 4*?

The OS .46 FX is a great engine for either plane. I had both and enjoyed the Mid Star 40 more then I did the 4 Star 40 but I guess that's just me. The Mid Star just seemed to outperform and was more fun to fly and would get another one in a heart beat.
Old 12-01-2002 | 01:22 AM
  #3  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default .46fx in a 4*?

I have a Mid-Star and have flown a Four Star. Both are nice, I actually liked my Mid Star better, and the engine will work fine. These planes do not make good warbird transition planes because they are light, very easy to fly, and land slow.
Old 12-01-2002 | 01:22 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
Default .46fx in a 4*?

Thanks for the replys. So what would be a good 2nd plane to transition to a warbird with(.40 size)?
Old 12-01-2002 | 02:41 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Terrell, TX
Default .46fx in a 4*?

I love the Mid Star, probably 10% of our club fly's them,on mine I have a OS 70 FS.I think the Mid Star is a better plane than the 4*'s.
Old 12-01-2002 | 02:48 AM
  #6  
David Cutler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default .46fx in a 4*?

I loved my Mid Star for learning aerobatics too. An OS 46fx goes well in it.

One slight comment about the Mid Star though... If you want to spin from a great height, and do so for more than, say, 4 turns, it will take a further 1-2 turns to get out of the spin after you center the controls.

As you can imagine, this fact caused me a bit of heart flutter when I tried my first sustained spin!

If it doesn't come out of the spin (and this applies to other planes too) center rudder, down elevator (yes! down!) and full throttle should bring the wing out of stall, then you can up elevator and swoop up 18 inches from the ground!

David C.
Old 12-01-2002 | 03:00 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
Default .46fx in a 4*?

Thanks for the input. Does anybody else have an opinion about what's a good plane to get into scale warbirds with?
Old 12-01-2002 | 03:18 AM
  #8  
David Cutler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default .46fx in a 4*?

If you want to get into a warbird before a few 'stick hours' on a low wing tail dragger, you need one that can land slowly without the wing stalling.

Just keep the speed up more than you would with a trainer.

I'd recommend the Model Tech Mustang ARF. It has a thick wing section, low wing loading, and lands really easily. Nice looking too!

David C.
Old 12-01-2002 | 06:46 AM
  #9  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default .46fx in a 4*?

A plane you may want to consider is the new Ultra Sport. From what the GP guys are saying it might make a decent, stable second plane, which you can slowly work the CG back and move the throws up a little. After you master that plane you should be ready to try something like a P-47.
Old 12-01-2002 | 11:19 AM
  #10  
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default Scale warbird choice

Originally posted by WARBIRDLVR
Thanks for the input. Does anybody else have an opinion about what's a good plane to get into scale warbirds with?
An AT-6 (aka as the Texan or SNJ for the Navy) is a really good plane to start with. It flies like a pattern plane so will allow the leearning curve with warbirds to be smoother. Learning the set up of retrats and flaps that most other planes don't use and then going to more advanced types like the P-51 or P-47 would be good second choices. The German Stuka is a good first plane and has the advantage of fixed gear.

Planes to avoid as a first attempt:
Twins (P-38 etc)
World war one particularly the bipes and tripes with short noses.

Good luck and happy flying.
EXCAP232

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.