.46fx in a 4*?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle
Right now I'm flying a pt-40, and i would eventully like to get into scale(TF .60 P-47). I'm thinking about building a sig mid or 4 star, and i'm wondering if my .46fx would be to big. I'm also wondering if these planes would be good to ease into flying warbirds with. TIA, Brendan.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
The OS .46 FX is a great engine for either plane. I had both and enjoyed the Mid Star 40 more then I did the 4 Star 40 but I guess that's just me. The Mid Star just seemed to outperform and was more fun to fly and would get another one in a heart beat.
#3
Senior Member
I have a Mid-Star and have flown a Four Star. Both are nice, I actually liked my Mid Star better, and the engine will work fine. These planes do not make good warbird transition planes because they are light, very easy to fly, and land slow.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles,
CA
I loved my Mid Star for learning aerobatics too. An OS 46fx goes well in it.
One slight comment about the Mid Star though... If you want to spin from a great height, and do so for more than, say, 4 turns, it will take a further 1-2 turns to get out of the spin after you center the controls.
As you can imagine, this fact caused me a bit of heart flutter when I tried my first sustained spin!
If it doesn't come out of the spin (and this applies to other planes too) center rudder, down elevator (yes! down!) and full throttle should bring the wing out of stall, then you can up elevator and swoop up 18 inches from the ground!
David C.
One slight comment about the Mid Star though... If you want to spin from a great height, and do so for more than, say, 4 turns, it will take a further 1-2 turns to get out of the spin after you center the controls.
As you can imagine, this fact caused me a bit of heart flutter when I tried my first sustained spin!
If it doesn't come out of the spin (and this applies to other planes too) center rudder, down elevator (yes! down!) and full throttle should bring the wing out of stall, then you can up elevator and swoop up 18 inches from the ground!
David C.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles,
CA
If you want to get into a warbird before a few 'stick hours' on a low wing tail dragger, you need one that can land slowly without the wing stalling.
Just keep the speed up more than you would with a trainer.
I'd recommend the Model Tech Mustang ARF. It has a thick wing section, low wing loading, and lands really easily. Nice looking too!
David C.
Just keep the speed up more than you would with a trainer.
I'd recommend the Model Tech Mustang ARF. It has a thick wing section, low wing loading, and lands really easily. Nice looking too!
David C.
#9
Senior Member
A plane you may want to consider is the new Ultra Sport. From what the GP guys are saying it might make a decent, stable second plane, which you can slowly work the CG back and move the throws up a little. After you master that plane you should be ready to try something like a P-47.
#10

My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Frederick,
MD
Originally posted by WARBIRDLVR
Thanks for the input. Does anybody else have an opinion about what's a good plane to get into scale warbirds with?
Thanks for the input. Does anybody else have an opinion about what's a good plane to get into scale warbirds with?
Planes to avoid as a first attempt:
Twins (P-38 etc)
World war one particularly the bipes and tripes with short noses.
Good luck and happy flying.
EXCAP232



