Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 relocating the servos rearward. >

relocating the servos rearward.

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

relocating the servos rearward.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2006 | 12:44 AM
  #1  
txaggie08's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: College Station, TX
Default relocating the servos rearward.

WEll im back rolling on the four star 120, and am coming up to the point i have to decide on servos etc.


Im going to run a homelite 45cc conversion wiht electronic ignition on this plane from BCMA enignes. Theyre a little heavier than the glow motor it was designed for, and between the EI gear the motor, and the firewall reinforcement, im worried about mounting the servos close to the centerline.


I was seriously considering placing the two servo mounts to the rear of the plane. If both will fit i would mount them inboad with an access hatch between the second to last and last formers. It will keep the clean look, but with a hatch i can still get to them after covering. it will also add considerable mass to the extreme rear of the plane. It would also mean very short push rods instead of the longer more flexible ones running from mid plane.

Does anyone see a problem with doing it this way? Obviously im going to run heavy duty extensions to the rear servos. but those arent insanely expensive. ive heard these planes tend to be nose heavy anyway, and the heavier motor is not going to help....


Im was also planning on running 3010 servos in the fuse(or the tower version thats the same torque) and possibly digis on the ailerons(the low profile ones). Ive got a 9650 digital im not using, so it may go on the throttle, but i dont know i might just get a small servo for it. I thought if i used a smaller unit(like the spare 9650 ive got) i could run a VERY short linkage imeadeatly behind the firewall...



Thanks and Gig'em
Old 03-27-2006 | 07:23 AM
  #2  
rjm1982's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chesapeake, VA
Default RE: relocating the servos rearward.

I wouldnt see a problem with it...

Im building a venture 60 right now and doing the same thing...since im putting a 91 in it and thats a little heavier than the recommended...ive almost got mine done (im not a fan on lite-ply...but im almost done with it now...)
Old 03-27-2006 | 07:29 AM
  #3  
DavidAgar's Avatar
My Feedback: (108)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Battle Ground, WA
Default RE: relocating the servos rearward.

All of the 4 Stars that I have built and flown have been tail heavy and required nose weight to balance. You may want to do some balance tests on your plane to see where you are at befor making a final decision. Good Luck, Dave
Old 03-27-2006 | 04:50 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Antonio, TX
Default RE: relocating the servos rearward.


ORIGINAL: txaggie08

WEll im back rolling on the four star 120, and am coming up to the point i have to decide on servos etc.


Im going to run a homelite 45cc conversion wiht electronic ignition on this plane from BCMA enignes. Theyre a little heavier than the glow motor it was designed for, and between the EI gear the motor, and the firewall reinforcement, im worried about mounting the servos close to the centerline.

Answer, You may want to mount the servos on the outside of the fuselage in the rear, big bird style. This keeps it simple and allows you to inspect linkages easily. You would mount two servos for the elevators and one for the rudder.

I was seriously considering placing the two servo mounts to the rear of the plane. If both will fit i would mount them inboad with an access hatch between the second to last and last formers. It will keep the clean look, but with a hatch i can still get to them after covering. it will also add considerable mass to the extreme rear of the plane. It would also mean very short push rods instead of the longer more flexible ones running from mid plane.

Does anyone see a problem with doing it this way? Obviously im going to run heavy duty extensions to the rear servos. but those arent insanely expensive. ive heard these planes tend to be nose heavy anyway, and the heavier motor is not going to help....


Im was also planning on running 3010 servos in the fuse(or the tower version thats the same torque) and possibly digis on the ailerons(the low profile ones). Ive got a 9650 digital im not using, so it may go on the throttle, but i dont know i might just get a small servo for it. I thought if i used a smaller unit(like the spare 9650 ive got) i could run a VERY short linkage imeadeatly behind the firewall...

Answer; If you are running a gas/ignition engine, you really need to keep all of your electronics at least 12-16" away from the enging and ignition components. Also, you will want to run push rods that are not metal from the throttle servo to the engine. Metal pushrods can act as EMI antenna's and give you problems with interference. There are some really good threads, here on RCU, that cover gas engines and the ins and outs. You may want to read them over, you may come across some information you haven't considered, but could put to good use. Good luck, this should be an interesting project.


Thanks and Gig'em
Old 03-27-2006 | 07:42 PM
  #5  
B.L.E.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: relocating the servos rearward.

Look at the plans sent with the kit. Are they printed on paper as most of them are? If so, you can modify them.

On the other hand....

If the plans that came with your kit are carved on big stone tablets, I'm afraid you will have to build the plane exactly as the plans show.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.