Which plane for a beginner?
#27
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bloomington,
IL
Ever tried a hobbico superstar? There are different versions of the superstars and they are nitro powered (1 is electric powered). they can also be converted to electric motor. Try the Superstar.
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...ar&FVPROFIL=++
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...ar&FVPROFIL=++
#28
ORIGINAL: MT RC
Ok, well if it needs some work then do you think maybe the Nexstar would be better? I also will definatly be joining a club. I would like to see some planes flying also, if I can go to the field at the right time.
Ok, well if it needs some work then do you think maybe the Nexstar would be better? I also will definatly be joining a club. I would like to see some planes flying also, if I can go to the field at the right time.
That is how it is sold.
If you check the threads you'll see that things like the servo blocks often come improperly glued, so yes work is a MUST before you fly it the first time.
What you must do to it is fairly minimal and can be done in an hour or so.
Don't let this necessarily dissuade you from necessarily getting one.
Hi wing planes are preferred as trainers, but I and many others had no problems starting out with the PTS.
The extra setup will also better familiarize you with your plane and is time well spent before your first flight.
Consider a sim as well as joining a club.
Any good quality sim will cost, but will be worth it's cost over and over again.
On days you can't fly, you will be able to use the sim to hone your skills.
---
BTW: We've had several Nexstar planes with the ATC setup go crazy at our field and nose in on their first flight or two.
Most people now fly with the ATC off now.
#29
R/C-Plane, MT has all ready said that he is going to do it right, use a four channel 40 size glow trainer and join a club. Considering starting with a 1 1/2 lb. 3 channel electric plane is going backwards. The plane you suggest does fly well but if MT started with that, he would still need training to get used to a glow setup regarding engine starting, tuneup ect. and a nitro trainer would fly at rocket speeds compared to the electric trainer. If MT switched to a standard glow trainer after flying the electric without being on a buddy box, he would probably crash it in 10 seconds.[>:]
#30
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: mulkeytown, IL
I am a newbe also and have the p51pts and am very impressed with it. the low wing design make it almost impossible to flip over like some high wing trainers and with the landing gear pointed foward like it does its very unlikely that you can nosedive it while taxiing or take-offs. you can get in your radio and set your control setting to limit your "throws" to keep from over steering.
#32
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Akron,
OH
Thanks guys. I will most likely be buying the P-51, and join a club definatly. I am looking forward to using that sim to see how good I am at flying!
#33
ORIGINAL: aviation metal smith
I am a newbe also and have the p51pts and am very impressed with it. the low wing design make it almost impossible to flip over like some high wing trainers and with the landing gear pointed foward like it does its very unlikely that you can nosedive it while taxiing or take-offs. you can get in your radio and set your control setting to limit your "throws" to keep from over steering.
I am a newbe also and have the p51pts and am very impressed with it. the low wing design make it almost impossible to flip over like some high wing trainers and with the landing gear pointed foward like it does its very unlikely that you can nosedive it while taxiing or take-offs. you can get in your radio and set your control setting to limit your "throws" to keep from over steering.
What your referring to a nose over, the P-51 PTS can nose over like any other tail dragger. As far as flipping, a low wing will flip as easy as a high wing. If you are referring to going up on a wing tip and nose, a high wing tricycle geared plane is more susceptible to having a wing raised with a quartering tail wind or direct cross wind. On take off and landing into the wind, tricycle geared aircraft are less susceptible to going up on the nose, or on a wing tip unless ground looped. Tricycle geared aircraft are also easier to learn take-off and landing with. I've seen the P-15 PTS end up on its nose on landing, flip on it's back, nose over on take-off, ground loop, and have the landing gear ripped out.
MT RC,
Before you jump on the P-51 PTS, go to a club meeting, find out what they have for flight instruction, and what type of aircraft and radio they prefer at that club. You may end up with a plane that is not popular there, and possibly no buddy box available to fly on.
Hogflyer
#34
Hogflyer is right. I don't think 3 channel radios even have a buddy box connection and no one wants to try training on someones small electric. They can get in trouble if the wind comes up and then after 1 flight the batterys need to be pulled and replaced or recharged for at least 3/4 hour while everyone sits around waiting.
#36
A buddy box is when you hook two transmitters together with a special connector that plugs into ports in the transmitters. The instructor holds the master that controls the plane. On the master is a switch that when held allows the second box, the slave or buddy box, to have control over the plane through the master box. This allows the instructor to quickly recover the plane by releasing a switch instead of grabbing the other transmitter.
The P-51 PTS is not really hard to fly, it's just not as forgiving as a flat bottom airfoil trainer. Flat bottom airfoil trainers will have a tendency to return to level flight when the controls are released while in a bank, climb or dive. The PTS, with it's symmetrical will be more aerobatic with the training aids removed and makes a great second trainer. The PTS also lands a lot faster, and the slower a plane flies in the pattern and on final the easier it is to learn how to land. Most trainers are tricycle geared which is also easier to learn take-off and landing over the conventional, or tail dragger gear of the PTS.
Hogflyer
The P-51 PTS is not really hard to fly, it's just not as forgiving as a flat bottom airfoil trainer. Flat bottom airfoil trainers will have a tendency to return to level flight when the controls are released while in a bank, climb or dive. The PTS, with it's symmetrical will be more aerobatic with the training aids removed and makes a great second trainer. The PTS also lands a lot faster, and the slower a plane flies in the pattern and on final the easier it is to learn how to land. Most trainers are tricycle geared which is also easier to learn take-off and landing over the conventional, or tail dragger gear of the PTS.
Hogflyer
#37

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dickinson,
ND
MT RC Are you confused yet? LOL One thing about the flight sim that comes with the P-51 PTS, its not a very good sim unless they improved it alot over the last year. I would suggest the Real Flight G3 sim, but any of the higher end sims will work. As far as the P-51 PTS goes it is a great plane but not a great trainer, I'm not saying you can't learn on that plane but it is more to handle than a Nexstar. As far as the Nexstar goes it comes with a great sim ( a reduced version of G3 with only one plane and one flying site), but the A.F.S. active flight stabilization doesn't work very good if it works at all. Like most ppl suggested above find a local club and talk to the pilots there they will be more than happy to help you get started in your addicition OOPS did I say that out loud, I meant your new hobby.[:-]
#38
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cold Lake,
AB, CANADA
If I may make a suggestion before you get theP-51, try looking at the NEXSTAR. I spent about a month trying to figure out what would be best to start with and was also considering the P-51. But found that the Nexstar is better to begin with. It has a safety system in it so if you lose control in the air it will statilize it self, were as all other trainers don't. I have been flying it now for 2 months and starting to remove some of the trainer stuff to progress. Have talked to alot of club members who as have the P-51 and they all agree it is better as a second plane not your first one. Look closer to the Nexstar as a first one. It comes complete and plus once your done with it you can transfer everything into another plane. Warbirds are nice and that is the way I am heading with my hobby. P-51 will be my next plane after my trainer.
#39
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: East Orleans,
MA
ORIGINAL: Fastsky
Hogflyer is right. I don't think 3 channel radios even have a buddy box connection and no one wants to try training on someones small electric. They can get in trouble if the wind comes up and then after 1 flight the batterys need to be pulled and replaced or recharged for at least 3/4 hour while everyone sits around waiting.
Hogflyer is right. I don't think 3 channel radios even have a buddy box connection and no one wants to try training on someones small electric. They can get in trouble if the wind comes up and then after 1 flight the batterys need to be pulled and replaced or recharged for at least 3/4 hour while everyone sits around waiting.
Thanks, Spencer Howard
#41
ORIGINAL: hogflyer
The PTS also lands a lot faster, and the slower a plane flies in the pattern and on final the easier it is to learn how to land.
The PTS also lands a lot faster, and the slower a plane flies in the pattern and on final the easier it is to learn how to land.
We flew a PTS P-51 with the wing droops/brakes/flaps side by side with a Nexstar, and brought both to the slowest speed possible in flight to compare their decent and approach rates.
There was no difference when the droops were on and the flaps down. e.g. in training mode it behaves the same.




