Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 U.S. Aircore Trainer 40 >

U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2006 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
Default U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I just purchased an Aircore Trainer 40. Just wanted to see about getting some feedback on this plane. What does everyone think of the Aircore trainer?
Old 12-09-2006 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Burlington, NC
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

this is the kind of question you should ask before you buy...you would probably been advised to go in another direction, what engine do you have, you need atleast a .46, yes it is a tough plane, but usually tough planes are a bit heavy and have to fly a bit faster to stay in the air so if a mistake does happen, it happens faster...Rog
Old 12-09-2006 | 09:27 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
Old 12-09-2006 | 09:36 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Burlington, NC
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing,,it may be a great flyer dont get me wrong...but its a spad (Simple Plastic Airplane Design) and as such usually people build them because they are cheap, like $10 in parts , so they arent usually bought....good luck with it and I hope it works well for you...Rog
Old 12-10-2006 | 12:00 AM
  #5  
Scar's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Peoria Hts, Il. IL
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40


ORIGINAL: rhousejr

I just purchased an Aircore Trainer 40. Just wanted to see about getting some feedback on this plane. What does everyone think of the Aircore trainer?
Ahem. Having actually flown one, and used it for the purpose of training the student who bought it, I would say it is a perfectly adequate training plane. It will fly slow, and is well behaved.

Yes, it's different. That doesn't make it bad, as I learned when helping the student.

Good luck,
Dave Olson
Old 12-10-2006 | 09:26 AM
  #6  
Jim C.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: armagh, PA
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

Just dont ever buy the cub version. It SUCKS. you may need more than a .46 for it.
Old 12-10-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Union Grove, AL
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I bought one of these about 8 years ago. I put it on floats with a 40 size engine. Never was able to get it off the water. I am about to try a 61 on it and see if that helps any. Built mine with the flaps and was hoping in would be a good flyer. Let me know how yours does with the 46. I may pull the floats and try it on land. In case your wondering the aircore floats kind of suck in my opinion.
Old 12-10-2006 | 02:04 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I read somewhere in order to use the floats you will need more ummph, hence the need for a larger engine, or maybe a prop change. I talked with a guy who is running a .46 on one he says it is great. I plan to build and fly next week. I will let you guys know how it goes. Thanks for all the replies. Reed
Old 12-11-2006 | 06:36 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Spartanburg, SC
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

It's ugly, but it flys well and it's tough. Good trainer, IMO.

Dr.1
Old 12-11-2006 | 04:27 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I had one, and I have a friend who gave me parts for 3 of the low wing Colt Trainers.

here is what I can tell you:

A .46 is not alot of power for that plane, it will be a bit sluggish and need a long take off roll, but for a trainer slow is not a bad thing.

The plane can take one heck of a pounding, I saw my buddy nose dive his at full throttle into the ground, and he had it up the next weekend, you cannot do that with Balsa.

If you want to fly floats on it, you will need a .60 for sure to get any reasonable performance.

It is not really building, but folding and gluing, still it will take some time. I have now built about 7 planes and can tell you that the fun I have is the building side of the hobby, Aircore does not come close to the pride of building a proper balsa plane from plans and a box of wood.

Enjoy it, you will have fun, the .46 should be OK
Old 12-11-2006 | 04:36 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Spartanburg, SC
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I'll add something to my previous post. Yes, it's a little heavy and the .46 is a good engine for it. However, the landing speed is reasonnable, and the extra weight will help the novice handle winds that would ground other trainers.

Dr.1
Old 12-11-2006 | 05:56 PM
  #12  
Scar's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Peoria Hts, Il. IL
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40


ORIGINAL: rhousejr
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
flyinrog: Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing<<snip>>
manks7477: It is not really building, but folding and gluing<<snip>>
rhousejr : Just never you mind, go ahead and fly it.

When you want advice on the definition of the terrm "building", I guess you can just look here in the "Beginners" forum, no shortage of guys who know that definition here.

Sheesh,
Dave Olson
Old 12-11-2006 | 06:31 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

tHANKS FOR ALL THE REPLIES, IT IS REALLY HELPFUL AND FUN.
Old 12-11-2006 | 06:49 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wapato, WA
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

My brother had one and it flew okay, but wouldn't float like a wood trainer. He sold it to my uncle, who crashed it into power lines 2 times, flew it through the spokes of a wheel line, and into te ground and it still lived. It finally met it's death after a full speed crash into the ground due to battery failure. Tough plane otherwise.
Old 12-12-2006 | 10:14 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40


ORIGINAL: Scar


ORIGINAL: rhousejr
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
flyinrog: Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing<<snip>>
manks7477: It is not really building, but folding and gluing<<snip>>
rhousejr : Just never you mind, go ahead and fly it.

When you want advice on the definition of the terrm "building", I guess you can just look here in the "Beginners" forum, no shortage of guys who know that definition here.

Sheesh,
Dave Olson

Dave - I have no problem with this plane, it is a great one for beginners, and it goes together very fast. In my opinion there is not as much pride - for me anyway- in building that plane vs one of the other kits I have now built that's all.

The Aircore trainer was my first plane and I enjoyed it until someone stole it out of my garage. It is great to learn on and it fast and easy to put together, and at the end of the day it got me into the hobby and directed me to building.

I have 7 planes (plus the Aircore) that I have built, so I am not exactly a "beginner".
Old 12-12-2006 | 10:52 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: La Paz BCS, MEXICO
Default RE: U.S. Aircore Trainer 40

I have several SPADS and they are heavy but they take a lot of punishment. Check out the Spadet 40 at http://www.spadtothebone.com/SPAD/index.html for a trainer.

Fellas may laugh at the appearance but they are durable. First bipe just folded it together in an afternoon!!
Nearest LHS is about 1000 miles and a border crossing, I like durable.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec89190.gif
Views:	130
Size:	152.7 KB
ID:	576198   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xs57895.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	41.3 KB
ID:	576199  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.