U.S. Aircore Trainer 40
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
I just purchased an Aircore Trainer 40. Just wanted to see about getting some feedback on this plane. What does everyone think of the Aircore trainer?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
this is the kind of question you should ask before you buy...you would probably been advised to go in another direction, what engine do you have, you need atleast a .46, yes it is a tough plane, but usually tough planes are a bit heavy and have to fly a bit faster to stay in the air so if a mistake does happen, it happens faster...Rog
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing,,it may be a great flyer dont get me wrong...but its a spad (Simple Plastic Airplane Design) and as such usually people build them because they are cheap, like $10 in parts , so they arent usually bought....good luck with it and I hope it works well for you...Rog
#5

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: rhousejr
I just purchased an Aircore Trainer 40. Just wanted to see about getting some feedback on this plane. What does everyone think of the Aircore trainer?
I just purchased an Aircore Trainer 40. Just wanted to see about getting some feedback on this plane. What does everyone think of the Aircore trainer?
Yes, it's different. That doesn't make it bad, as I learned when helping the student.
Good luck,
Dave Olson
#7
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Union Grove, AL
I bought one of these about 8 years ago. I put it on floats with a 40 size engine. Never was able to get it off the water. I am about to try a 61 on it and see if that helps any. Built mine with the flaps and was hoping in would be a good flyer. Let me know how yours does with the 46. I may pull the floats and try it on land. In case your wondering the aircore floats kind of suck in my opinion.
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Morgantown, KY
I read somewhere in order to use the floats you will need more ummph, hence the need for a larger engine, or maybe a prop change. I talked with a guy who is running a .46 on one he says it is great. I plan to build and fly next week. I will let you guys know how it goes. Thanks for all the replies. Reed
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: toronto,
ON, CANADA
I had one, and I have a friend who gave me parts for 3 of the low wing Colt Trainers.
here is what I can tell you:
A .46 is not alot of power for that plane, it will be a bit sluggish and need a long take off roll, but for a trainer slow is not a bad thing.
The plane can take one heck of a pounding, I saw my buddy nose dive his at full throttle into the ground, and he had it up the next weekend, you cannot do that with Balsa.
If you want to fly floats on it, you will need a .60 for sure to get any reasonable performance.
It is not really building, but folding and gluing, still it will take some time. I have now built about 7 planes and can tell you that the fun I have is the building side of the hobby, Aircore does not come close to the pride of building a proper balsa plane from plans and a box of wood.
Enjoy it, you will have fun, the .46 should be OK
here is what I can tell you:
A .46 is not alot of power for that plane, it will be a bit sluggish and need a long take off roll, but for a trainer slow is not a bad thing.
The plane can take one heck of a pounding, I saw my buddy nose dive his at full throttle into the ground, and he had it up the next weekend, you cannot do that with Balsa.
If you want to fly floats on it, you will need a .60 for sure to get any reasonable performance.
It is not really building, but folding and gluing, still it will take some time. I have now built about 7 planes and can tell you that the fun I have is the building side of the hobby, Aircore does not come close to the pride of building a proper balsa plane from plans and a box of wood.
Enjoy it, you will have fun, the .46 should be OK
#11
Senior Member
I'll add something to my previous post. Yes, it's a little heavy and the .46 is a good engine for it. However, the landing speed is reasonnable, and the extra weight will help the novice handle winds that would ground other trainers.
Dr.1
Dr.1
#12

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: rhousejr
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
flyinrog: Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing<<snip>>
manks7477: It is not really building, but folding and gluing<<snip>>
When you want advice on the definition of the terrm "building", I guess you can just look here in the "Beginners" forum, no shortage of guys who know that definition here.
Sheesh,
Dave Olson
#14
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Wapato,
WA
My brother had one and it flew okay, but wouldn't float like a wood trainer. He sold it to my uncle, who crashed it into power lines 2 times, flew it through the spokes of a wheel line, and into te ground and it still lived. It finally met it's death after a full speed crash into the ground due to battery failure. Tough plane otherwise.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: toronto,
ON, CANADA
ORIGINAL: Scar
rhousejr : Just never you mind, go ahead and fly it.
When you want advice on the definition of the terrm "building", I guess you can just look here in the "Beginners" forum, no shortage of guys who know that definition here.
Sheesh,
Dave Olson
ORIGINAL: rhousejr
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
I have a .46 I am putting in it. I like building, I never built one of these. Thats why I went ahead and got it. Probably be something different next month. Thanks for the reply.
flyinrog: Well, no offense but its not really building, its more of a fold and glue kind of thing<<snip>>
manks7477: It is not really building, but folding and gluing<<snip>>
When you want advice on the definition of the terrm "building", I guess you can just look here in the "Beginners" forum, no shortage of guys who know that definition here.
Sheesh,
Dave Olson
Dave - I have no problem with this plane, it is a great one for beginners, and it goes together very fast. In my opinion there is not as much pride - for me anyway- in building that plane vs one of the other kits I have now built that's all.
The Aircore trainer was my first plane and I enjoyed it until someone stole it out of my garage. It is great to learn on and it fast and easy to put together, and at the end of the day it got me into the hobby and directed me to building.
I have 7 planes (plus the Aircore) that I have built, so I am not exactly a "beginner".
#16
Senior Member
I have several SPADS and they are heavy but they take a lot of punishment. Check out the Spadet 40 at http://www.spadtothebone.com/SPAD/index.html for a trainer.
Fellas may laugh at the appearance but they are durable. First bipe just folded it together in an afternoon!!
Nearest LHS is about 1000 miles and a border crossing, I like durable.
Fellas may laugh at the appearance but they are durable. First bipe just folded it together in an afternoon!!
Nearest LHS is about 1000 miles and a border crossing, I like durable.



