Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 O.S .65 LA engine >

O.S .65 LA engine

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

O.S .65 LA engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2013 | 01:43 PM
  #51  
bigedmustafa's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Originally Posted by bigedmustafa
Keep in mind that bushed engines such as the O.S. LA-series and the Thunder Tiger GP-series engines require a significant amount of castor oil as part of the lubrication content of the fuel. The ideal fuel for an O.S. Max .65 LA would be 10% Nitro and 20% to 25% oil content that is 100% castor oil. The castor oil actually helps "float" some of the engine components at speed to prevent excessive wear.

These engines offer adequate power for their size, they can be very reliable and very long lasting. Running these engines with 100% synthetic lubrication or 80/20 synth/castor fuel will chew them to pieces.

I believe the primary reason that bushing engines have fallen so far out of favor in recent years is that the fuel commonly available at most hobby stores simply isn't designed for these engines and getting good running results is almost impossible for novice pilots who aren't familiar with the fuel requirements for these engines.
It's weird seeing my comments and opinions from six and a half years ago!

I'm happy to say that I still believe my old opinion was correct. My fuel recommendations weren't solely for the .65 LA, but I was thinking of the Thunder Tiger GP and K&B Sportster series engines as well.

The O.S. .65 LA is a terrific bargain among .60-size two stroke engines, and time hasn't changed that. They are powerful, reliable, and easy to tune; I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the .65 LA for most applications.

To clarify my comments about the .65 LA in particular, I believe that it would be adequately lubricated by fuel with an 80/20 synth/castor oil package. I wouldn't run a K&B Sportster with the same lubrication, however. I'm still confident that a 50/50 synth/castor blend would be better for the .65 LA, and would result in a longer lasting engine and better performance over the years.

O.S. Max LA-series engines that are noisy, down on power, or finicky to tune are usually the ones that have been run for a while with synthetic lubrication and they've simply worn down before their time.

The bottom line? The .65 LA is a very good engine, just don't run it with fuel made with 100% synthetic oil.
Old 10-21-2013 | 03:14 PM
  #52  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses guys, I will stick with this engine for this hog build.
Old 10-21-2013 | 04:02 PM
  #53  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,299
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ivyland, PA
Default

I agree. Nothing wrong with bushed engines. Ball bearings rust and require replacement. Bushed engines seem to last forever.
Old 10-21-2013 | 07:59 PM
  #54  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Ocala, Florida
Default

The BAD news is...I believe the 65 LA has been discontinued! I have one flying in a plane now and a spare one, new in the box, waiting for an assignment. I like the LA series engines for sport and scale use. Sorry to see the 65 LA go.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.