Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 tail heavy, wing loading? >

tail heavy, wing loading?

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

tail heavy, wing loading?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2007 | 03:13 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: kansas City, MO
Default tail heavy, wing loading?

I am just about done restoring and modifying an old Thunder Tiger Skylark 40 size trainer. Since I can't track down the original plans, I'm using this calculator to find a COG range,

http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg_cal...&result10=0.68

I think I may be tail-heavy. Right now my wing loading is 17.5 oz./sq.ft. (with empty tank). If I need to add nose weight, how much wing loading is too much for a trainer? It has a well broken-in Magnum 40. A previous owner already epoxied in several bars of lead behind the firewall which are still there. But I think my mods may have added some tail weight (metal pushrods, larger elevator and rudder).

The receiver is as far forward as possible, and the battery is built in under the tank, assuming it as forward as possible. Is lead behind the firewall the only/best way to add to add nose weight?
Old 03-27-2007 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: pembroke, NH
Default RE: tail heavy, wing loading?

trainers can handle a higher wing loading due to the high lift airfoil an old guide would be one pound weight per 100 square inches of wing area.you could try using a heavier spinner or nose wheel or even a weighted prop nut,weight needs to be as far forward as possible.hope you reduce the throws on the larger control surfaces as things could git touchy ,that and a rear cg is a disaster waiting to happen.most trainners will balance on the main spar which should be the thickest part of the wing.
Old 03-27-2007 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: kansas City, MO
Default RE: tail heavy, wing loading?

I think I'm good! My CG is right on the main spar with tank empty, my CG (or finger balance point) is within the limits according to the calculator with or without the ailerons included in the wing chord. I will have an instructor take it up and trim it for me just to make sure because I am a newbie. The throws are toward the low end.

Aerowoof, one more question: Wing loading w/empty tank is about 18. With my wing area at 780 sq. in. are you telling me by your rule of thumb this plane could handle 7.8 lbs. without being a tank? Right now it wieghs in at abt. 6 lb. Doesn't engine size also factor in?

And what about prop size and pitch? I'm wanting it to be a "gentle" trainer at this point. (Maybe this should be in the aerodynamics forum). It has a 10 X 6 prop now. Help a newbie get his head around thrust etc. Thanks.
Old 03-28-2007 | 12:47 AM
  #4  
Mr67Stang's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,822
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Raeford, NC
Default RE: tail heavy, wing loading?


ORIGINAL: mbilar1

I think I'm good! My CG is right on the main spar with tank empty, my CG (or finger balance point) is within the limits according to the calculator with or without the ailerons included in the wing chord. I will have an instructor take it up and trim it for me just to make sure because I am a newbie. The throws are toward the low end.

Aerowoof, one more question: Wing loading w/empty tank is about 18. With my wing area at 780 sq. in. are you telling me by your rule of thumb this plane could handle 7.8 lbs. without being a tank? Right now it wieghs in at abt. 6 lb. Doesn't engine size also factor in?

And what about prop size and pitch? I'm wanting it to be a "gentle" trainer at this point. (Maybe this should be in the aerodynamics forum). It has a 10 X 6 prop now. Help a newbie get his head around thrust etc. Thanks.
Sounds like you have it fixed. As for your question to Aerowoof, yes your plane would fly even if it was 7.8lbs. (8 lbs.) assuming you have enough power to pull it. Grass runways require more power to get up to airspeed. I had a buddy with a .40LA that could not get his 6 lbs trainer up to speed unless the grass was freshly cut. If you have a smooth (paved/concrete) runway you would just have a longer take off role. In general a plane with higher wing loading will have a higher stall speed. Thus it will have to be landed at a faster speed. So to keep things slow and "gentle" you will want to keep it as light as possible. Also larger diameter props with shallow pitch tend to fly slower but provide more grunt pulling power... Could help with taller grass.
Old 03-28-2007 | 06:23 AM
  #5  
B.L.E.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: tail heavy, wing loading?

If you have to choose between tail heavy and higher wing loading, choose higher wing loading.
Old 03-28-2007 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: pembroke, NH
Default RE: tail heavy, wing loading?

ther is a little advantage to a heaver trainer.the do not get blown around in the wind as bad.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.