prop size for 180 4s.
#27
Well that works out to needing at LEAST a 36oz tank to attempt to get 10 minutes of flight out of a BGX.
Or roughly 3.2 flights out of a gallon of fuel.
Yup it's NOT cheap and it will guzzle fuel, but it is not quite as bad as I thought given how the BGX is made out to be in terms of fuel consumption....
Or roughly 3.2 flights out of a gallon of fuel.
Yup it's NOT cheap and it will guzzle fuel, but it is not quite as bad as I thought given how the BGX is made out to be in terms of fuel consumption....
#28
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Galloway,
NJ
Opjose,
I burn 16 OZ in a ten minute flight with the 1.60 Flying pattern manuevers (alot of vertical)
the BGX is 9 more CC's so I would think 20-22oz for a similar flight. (Not all WOT)
and it costs $250 less than a top of the line 50cc. Maybe not the best for 3D but most likely
a good candidate for IMAC style flying if you don't mind the fuel cost. I think OS should send some
our way for some good field testing.
I burn 16 OZ in a ten minute flight with the 1.60 Flying pattern manuevers (alot of vertical)
the BGX is 9 more CC's so I would think 20-22oz for a similar flight. (Not all WOT)
and it costs $250 less than a top of the line 50cc. Maybe not the best for 3D but most likely
a good candidate for IMAC style flying if you don't mind the fuel cost. I think OS should send some
our way for some good field testing.
#29
Thanks.
I have a BGX-1 and I've been wondering about trying to install it in a 1.40 Fiberglass Yak 54.
The weight of the engine is right for this plane, though I'm a bit concerned about overdoing it in the power area... and hearing here about it's fuel consumption made me wonder if I should forgo it altogether.
it sounds like it wouldn't be all that bad.
I have a BGX-1 and I've been wondering about trying to install it in a 1.40 Fiberglass Yak 54.
The weight of the engine is right for this plane, though I'm a bit concerned about overdoing it in the power area... and hearing here about it's fuel consumption made me wonder if I should forgo it altogether.
it sounds like it wouldn't be all that bad.
#30
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Galloway,
NJ
I was thinking about going with the new Great Planes Extra 330S and the BGX looks like a perfect fit.
I have heard that the big scale GP stuff comes out a bit heavy so a 47OZ motor might be on target.
Link to plane: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXTAW7&P=0
link to engine: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXBY40&P=0
For those who haven't seen a BGX-1
Sorry for hijacking Goirish, I'll stop now.
I have heard that the big scale GP stuff comes out a bit heavy so a 47OZ motor might be on target.
Link to plane: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXTAW7&P=0
link to engine: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXBY40&P=0
For those who haven't seen a BGX-1
Sorry for hijacking Goirish, I'll stop now.
#33
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Galloway,
NJ
ORIGINAL: opjose
It looks like the two will be perfect fits for each other.
Add a Pitts smoke muffler and you'll be putting on a show!
It looks like the two will be perfect fits for each other.
Add a Pitts smoke muffler and you'll be putting on a show!


Mostly want to buy this setup for precision aerobatics, I like 3D but I get my 3D fix with my foamys
and other electrics. I am going to wait until August or September then I will order the plane and engine.
If I can keep it under 13 pound and that motor can swing a 20x8-10, it should have ballistic vertical.
#34
Hey CG
Here is something for you
Only special minds can read this
fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
Here is something for you
Only special minds can read this
fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
Ok Irish this is why I am so horrible at spelling
I can read this almost fast then I read books[
] man I need to work my brain out
have fun with your big bird





