Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Reload this Page >

which engine is better

Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

which engine is better

Old 05-07-2008, 05:20 PM
  #1  
buggyracer5
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: buffalo valley, TN
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default which engine is better

Im looking into buying an engine for my hot dogger, and have 2 engines to choose from. a gms .40 and an la .40. they both cost about the same, but which is better?
Old 05-07-2008, 05:29 PM
  #2  
DadsToysBG
My Feedback: (35)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

The word "hot dogger" and the two engines on your list just won't work. OS .46FX or AX is a good place to start. Dennis
Old 05-07-2008, 05:50 PM
  #3  
bigedmustafa
My Feedback: (2)
 
bigedmustafa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

The GMS engine is a real screamer, actually.
Old 05-07-2008, 06:08 PM
  #4  
jeffie8696
Senior Member
 
jeffie8696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

Have to agree with that, my GMS .32 is a Hot Rod.
Old 05-07-2008, 08:22 PM
  #5  
Jetdesign
My Feedback: (8)
 
Jetdesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 7,056
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

There were some Super Tigers at the field today. They are absolute screamers! Also very inexpensive. They are finicky to tune, but all the owners really loved them for high speed/sport flying.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:31 PM
  #6  
Charlie P.
 
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Crane, NY
Posts: 5,117
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

The .40 LA is a reliable engine but about as exciting as a hamburger bun.

Check out the Thunder Tiger Pro-46. That's a hot little package for the price. I put a Perry carb on mine and it truly IS a hot dogger in my Goldberg Hot Stik. As much plane as I can handle.

I had a Super Tigre G-51 with an 11X5 prop and that was a perfect marriage with my Kangke SK-50. Fast and maneuverable. Lost her last October at a fun fly coming in upright for a limbo event. Did a half roll at eye level at full throttle, made the inverted pass and touched a wing tip to the ground rolling back to upright at eye-level . . . almost. What looks like a true lineal roll at 100 feet appears less so at six feet. Talk about a re-kit. Hot-dogging and dumb thumbs at their finest. The ST51 was a bit finiky but an optical tach helped immensely. Mine prefered 10% Nitro over 15%.

Speaking of Kangke. I have one of their .50 engines that was a P.O.S. 24 consecutive dead sticks. The club two-stroke guru pronounced it "impossible to tune". Then I swapped out the carb for a Perry. It's right up there with the ST G-51 now! I'm really a fan of those Perry carbs. I ended up with one on my Thunder Tiger after a dirt nap damaged the needle valve collar and I couldn't keep it tight. Added about 800 rpm to the top end and it gets there quicker (no lag). They are VERY finiky to set initially but once set are contented with most conditions.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Rp42851.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	43.2 KB
ID:	945310   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hc91658.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	44.8 KB
ID:	945311  
Old 05-08-2008, 12:42 PM
  #7  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: which engine is better

The TT .40 is also very good. I think it is more powerfull per displacement than the TT .46.
Old 05-08-2008, 04:23 PM
  #8  
PipeMajor
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

The .40 and .46 cousins typically share the same stroke & crankcase. The increased displacement is usually accomplished by a larger bore which results in the thinner (and lighter) cylinder liner in the larger engine. Less weight and more power over the smaller cousin.
Old 05-22-2008, 08:26 AM
  #9  
speedair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: bangorwales, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: which engine is better

i would go for the 40 La

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.