The Super Decathlon
#26
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (8)
ORIGINAL: Nathan King
Woah, let's slow down here for a minute. I'm not sure if I would recommend jumping into a purpose built pattern airframe at this time. You're at the point in this hobby where you're the hardest on your models you'll probably ever be. You're off the leash so to speak, but still figuring things out (and bending airframes in the process). Why would you want to spend the time and money to set up a nice little intro pattern aircraft when there's a fair chance you may bend/break something to the point where it may not fly as well as it did. Then you're going to be in the same place you are now, frustrated and not happy with how the airplane flies wishing you had something else, plus you'll have a lighter wallet. I'm not saying don't do it. I can't really even recommend anything with absolute confidence because I don't know your flying skill and can't see you fly.
Don't forget, you've got the rest of your life to fly models ahead of you. You're not going to be the most skilled pilot at the field with the nicest, straightest, best set up, and most high end aircraft. It just isn't realistic.
Woah, let's slow down here for a minute. I'm not sure if I would recommend jumping into a purpose built pattern airframe at this time. You're at the point in this hobby where you're the hardest on your models you'll probably ever be. You're off the leash so to speak, but still figuring things out (and bending airframes in the process). Why would you want to spend the time and money to set up a nice little intro pattern aircraft when there's a fair chance you may bend/break something to the point where it may not fly as well as it did. Then you're going to be in the same place you are now, frustrated and not happy with how the airplane flies wishing you had something else, plus you'll have a lighter wallet. I'm not saying don't do it. I can't really even recommend anything with absolute confidence because I don't know your flying skill and can't see you fly.
Don't forget, you've got the rest of your life to fly models ahead of you. You're not going to be the most skilled pilot at the field with the nicest, straightest, best set up, and most high end aircraft. It just isn't realistic.
P.S. What do you have against the Super Decathlon? It seems like you've been fighting with it from day one. I just can't figure out why.
I need to get some sleep and fly my Dolphin.
#27
Well gaRC, you have peaked my interest. I have a Blackhorse (or Phoenix) Decathlon sitting on the table right now (not sure which because I bought it used). I've had it since last year. I am going to pull some radio gear out of one of my other flyers and get it into the air and see what all the cuffuffall is about with this airframe. I just can't imagine it being as hard to fly as some of my others. All my planes in my fleet fly totally differant from one another and that is what keeps me interested. I am going to power mine with an OS 60FP. If that doesn't produce results, I have a 55AX, TH 75 or a Magnum 91 that I could try. But I am quite sure the 60FP will be sufficient. I am not looking for a rocket (I have a couple of those already) I just want it to fly in a scale like manner. I have a few scale planes already so I am quite used to flying on the wing already without having to overpower the airframe. In my honest opinion, there is nothing more pretty to watch than a scale type airplane being flown in a scale like manner.
I will keep you posted of the results...either successful or disasterous
Cheers
Curt
I will keep you posted of the results...either successful or disasterous

Cheers
Curt
#28
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (8)
Yeah let me know what you think. I never said it was hard to fly, im just having trouble getting everything set up properly. Im sure its a great scale performer, i just didnt realize scale looks meant scale performance at first. last two flights with 10% i was at 3/4 to 7/8 throttle which is an improvement. Let me know if you end up flying close to WOT most of the time.
#29

My Feedback: (-1)
It's not A hard plane to fly, it's just different then A stunt plane or A floater like A Cub. My GP kit built had an OS 70 FS and that may have been over kill?? I learned A lot from that plane before I killed it.
GA, if you go over to the Classic Pattern Forum you can find A sticky {I think} on the Kaos and other types of the old pattern planes. Don't ask questions, just read what the guys are saying, think about it for A while then start talking to some of the guys like Rain Dave, really good people with lots of info to share.
You may want to give some of these older style of pattern ships A try, much cheaper and easier to get into.
I still have my old Bridi 60 size Kaos, it's getting rebuilt and covered for the third time.
When I have been having one of those really bad days like Chuck mentioned {yes, we all have them!!
}like when I stuffed my newest scratch built Extra, I will not leave the field on A nasty note like that. I fire up my old Kaos and Fly Like the Wind!!!!! I tear giant holes in the sky and impress myself!!
How can you do this you ask:: It's not me, it"s the Kaos, it can't help itself, they just fly.
The only ARF of this plane is the 40 size from Tower but not to worry, the Kaos has grand children, lots and lots of grand children so there are many of these types to choose from.
The Kaos was the pattern Champ in 1970 and for many years after, it is still A good plane for entry level pattern or IMAC if that's all you have. It's grand kids are A better choice but they are out there and not over priced.
I even have an old 120 size Kaos going through A rebuild, that's how much I think of this plane. Give some of the fun fly planes A look too, I still fly A real stupid Hots.
Go take A look at the Classics and give that poor Decathlon A rest, you may want to visit it again down the road.
CHUCK, how was that for some Pearls of Wisdom???


GA, if you go over to the Classic Pattern Forum you can find A sticky {I think} on the Kaos and other types of the old pattern planes. Don't ask questions, just read what the guys are saying, think about it for A while then start talking to some of the guys like Rain Dave, really good people with lots of info to share.
You may want to give some of these older style of pattern ships A try, much cheaper and easier to get into.
I still have my old Bridi 60 size Kaos, it's getting rebuilt and covered for the third time.
When I have been having one of those really bad days like Chuck mentioned {yes, we all have them!!
}like when I stuffed my newest scratch built Extra, I will not leave the field on A nasty note like that. I fire up my old Kaos and Fly Like the Wind!!!!! I tear giant holes in the sky and impress myself!!How can you do this you ask:: It's not me, it"s the Kaos, it can't help itself, they just fly.
The only ARF of this plane is the 40 size from Tower but not to worry, the Kaos has grand children, lots and lots of grand children so there are many of these types to choose from.
The Kaos was the pattern Champ in 1970 and for many years after, it is still A good plane for entry level pattern or IMAC if that's all you have. It's grand kids are A better choice but they are out there and not over priced.
I even have an old 120 size Kaos going through A rebuild, that's how much I think of this plane. Give some of the fun fly planes A look too, I still fly A real stupid Hots.
Go take A look at the Classics and give that poor Decathlon A rest, you may want to visit it again down the road.
CHUCK, how was that for some Pearls of Wisdom???



#30

My Feedback: (-1)
I just went over to Classic Pattern Flying and went into A thread titled, Which Kaos Is This?? It's still on the first page but may be pushed back soon.
Anyway, I opened it and someone posted an address for looking at planes, my goodness, you really need to go look if you like pattern ships. I have to go back there and steel, I mean, get some ideas for covering.
Some nice candy!!!
Anyway, I opened it and someone posted an address for looking at planes, my goodness, you really need to go look if you like pattern ships. I have to go back there and steel, I mean, get some ideas for covering.

Some nice candy!!!
#33
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Galloway,
NJ
Nathan that is a great looking model.
Here is a picture of the plane I won my first contest with. It's a wierd looking pattern plane
Joe,
I guess you don't need a pattern plane to compete in sportsman, but you do nees a plane capable of flying precise
and that Yak is pretty good. It won't see another contest as both of my 2 meter planes are complete.
Here is a picture of the plane I won my first contest with. It's a wierd looking pattern plane
Joe,
I guess you don't need a pattern plane to compete in sportsman, but you do nees a plane capable of flying precise
and that Yak is pretty good. It won't see another contest as both of my 2 meter planes are complete.
#37
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sun Prairie,
WI
A guy at our field has one with the 55 ax too. I cant remember the prop he runs, but it has more than enough power. It will hold a hover, but cant pull out of it. For what the plane was designed to do, the 55 ax is a good match. Check your fuel, glow plug, and readjust needle settings. If that doesnt get it done, send in the engine to be checked out.
#38
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bogota, COLOMBIA
ORIGINAL: overbored77
Nathan that is a great looking model.
Here is a picture of the plane I won my first contest with. It's a wierd looking pattern plane
Joe,
I guess you don't need a pattern plane to compete in sportsman, but you do nees a plane capable of flying precise
and that Yak is pretty good. It won't see another contest as both of my 2 meter planes are complete.
Nathan that is a great looking model.
Here is a picture of the plane I won my first contest with. It's a wierd looking pattern plane
Joe,
I guess you don't need a pattern plane to compete in sportsman, but you do nees a plane capable of flying precise
and that Yak is pretty good. It won't see another contest as both of my 2 meter planes are complete.
Overbored, I'm with the rest, It resembles Quique's YAK a LOT. I took a look carefully and noticed some differences mainly in the tail section and the cowl. The trim scheme is definitely based on Somenzini's design, right?
#39

My Feedback: (1)
Gray Beard I beleve your two beautiful Kaos' are the last of the great Bridi Kaos, the Killer Kaos.
Four of the Pheonix Decathalons have flown locally and all were lost likey from unrealistic purchaser expectations of some sort of super duper scale aerobat and/or a super slow flying floater and it is neither. Two of these airplanes I did the maidens on while they were an OK airplane they are not what the purchasers really wanted or were expecting in each case.
I salvaged the last one from the dumpster and changed it a little into the Champion Lancer, Yes there really were 22 of those ugly things built, a full scale factory bash. I think 19 flights now and it does not fly any better than the Pheonix Decathalon with a couple of 28's but more importantly it does not fly any worse.
John
Four of the Pheonix Decathalons have flown locally and all were lost likey from unrealistic purchaser expectations of some sort of super duper scale aerobat and/or a super slow flying floater and it is neither. Two of these airplanes I did the maidens on while they were an OK airplane they are not what the purchasers really wanted or were expecting in each case.
I salvaged the last one from the dumpster and changed it a little into the Champion Lancer, Yes there really were 22 of those ugly things built, a full scale factory bash. I think 19 flights now and it does not fly any better than the Pheonix Decathalon with a couple of 28's but more importantly it does not fly any worse.
John
#40
well gaRCfield, I finally got a chance to fly my Decathlon today with an OS60FP. She is a handfull on the ground but manageable with rudder. I fly off grass and have wheel pants on that I am going to take off. I also flew it without the wing struts. In the air it flew rock solid but did require about 3/4 to full throttle to make it perform. It will fly OK at 1/2 throttle but appears sluggish. Stall turns when using rudder caused a spin every time. Was fun doing these. Knife edges were hard too. It wants to roll over and spin doing these also. As far as landing, it is a very sweet landing aircraft, with a little throttle management, she floats in nicely.
In conclusion, a very pleasant change from the aircraft that I usually fly. Was not overpowered with the OS60FP but flew very scale like which made it enjoyable. Not a second airplane, maybe a 4th.
Now guys... a question. What prop should I be swinging on the old OS60FP? I have a 12x6 APC on it now. Should I drop down to an 11x6 for a few more rpms??? I bought this motor used and am unsure what is the best prop for it. Also is this a bushing or bearing engine?
Thanks
Curt
In conclusion, a very pleasant change from the aircraft that I usually fly. Was not overpowered with the OS60FP but flew very scale like which made it enjoyable. Not a second airplane, maybe a 4th.
Now guys... a question. What prop should I be swinging on the old OS60FP? I have a 12x6 APC on it now. Should I drop down to an 11x6 for a few more rpms??? I bought this motor used and am unsure what is the best prop for it. Also is this a bushing or bearing engine?
Thanks
Curt
#42

My Feedback: (1)
The 60FP was the budget OS before the LA series. Its a very user friendly reliable engine Not quite as powerful as other OS' in the sixty one size. This mainly because of a smaller venturi to assure good fuel draw for user friendliness.
It is a bushing type engine and has a bleeder carb without a second needle but a bleed screw for low end mixture control.
I would try an 11/7 first.
John
It is a bushing type engine and has a bleeder carb without a second needle but a bleed screw for low end mixture control.
I would try an 11/7 first.
John
#43
Thanks guys, prop clearance is not an issue on this plane, so I guess I'll just stick to the 12x6APC. I just wasn't sure if the 60FP would benefit from a little more RPM's or not. Being a lower powered bushing engine she probably can't get the RPM's that her bearinged siblings can obtain. The Phoenix Decathlon does fly very well with this motor and I don't think overpowering it would be very beneficial.
The Decathlon does very smooth rolls, loops and inverted flight is a piece of cake. I find that the rudder is extremely effective on this plane and has to be applied very carefully. The tricky ground handling was to be expected with the short coupling. But she lands just about as well as a trainer.
Curt
The Decathlon does very smooth rolls, loops and inverted flight is a piece of cake. I find that the rudder is extremely effective on this plane and has to be applied very carefully. The tricky ground handling was to be expected with the short coupling. But she lands just about as well as a trainer.
Curt
#45
John... so you think an 11x7 or 11x6 would be a better prop choice for the OS.61 FP than the 12x6?? I run all my 46's with the 11x6. The FP does seem to be lugging a bit.
Curt
Curt
#46

My Feedback: (1)
Yes I think that is to much prop for the FP. The engine needs to breathe just because it is a bushing engine does not mean it is a low RPM engine that is more a function of the cylinder bore/stoke ratio and the porting. Try an 11/7 that should net you a small RPM increase.
#47

My Feedback: (-1)
I would also buy an APC 12X4 and look at some of the 3-D props if they are in the 12 inch range with an even lower pitch. Prop selection is A trial and error thing until you find the prop YOU like to fly the plane with. I like mine slow with as much torque as I can get out of them. It's an engine/plane/prop combination that you the pilot are happy with.
I also like to over power them just A bit too.
JOHN, I'm rebuilding my old Bridi again and making some changes to it just for PLANE FUN right now. I will post up some photos in A week or two but I have A couple of things on the bench getting covered right now slowing down the Kaos.
Gene
I also like to over power them just A bit too.

JOHN, I'm rebuilding my old Bridi again and making some changes to it just for PLANE FUN right now. I will post up some photos in A week or two but I have A couple of things on the bench getting covered right now slowing down the Kaos.
Gene
#48
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (8)
ORIGINAL: Sourkraut
well gaRCfield, I finally got a chance to fly my Decathlon today with an OS60FP. She is a handfull on the ground but manageable with rudder. I fly off grass and have wheel pants on that I am going to take off. I also flew it without the wing struts. In the air it flew rock solid but did require about 3/4 to full throttle to make it perform. It will fly OK at 1/2 throttle but appears sluggish. Stall turns when using rudder caused a spin every time. Was fun doing these. Knife edges were hard too. It wants to roll over and spin doing these also. As far as landing, it is a very sweet landing aircraft, with a little throttle management, she floats in nicely.
In conclusion, a very pleasant change from the aircraft that I usually fly. Was not overpowered with the OS60FP but flew very scale like which made it enjoyable. Not a second airplane, maybe a 4th.
Now guys... a question. What prop should I be swinging on the old OS60FP? I have a 12x6 APC on it now. Should I drop down to an 11x6 for a few more rpms??? I bought this motor used and am unsure what is the best prop for it. Also is this a bushing or bearing engine?
Thanks
Curt
well gaRCfield, I finally got a chance to fly my Decathlon today with an OS60FP. She is a handfull on the ground but manageable with rudder. I fly off grass and have wheel pants on that I am going to take off. I also flew it without the wing struts. In the air it flew rock solid but did require about 3/4 to full throttle to make it perform. It will fly OK at 1/2 throttle but appears sluggish. Stall turns when using rudder caused a spin every time. Was fun doing these. Knife edges were hard too. It wants to roll over and spin doing these also. As far as landing, it is a very sweet landing aircraft, with a little throttle management, she floats in nicely.
In conclusion, a very pleasant change from the aircraft that I usually fly. Was not overpowered with the OS60FP but flew very scale like which made it enjoyable. Not a second airplane, maybe a 4th.
Now guys... a question. What prop should I be swinging on the old OS60FP? I have a 12x6 APC on it now. Should I drop down to an 11x6 for a few more rpms??? I bought this motor used and am unsure what is the best prop for it. Also is this a bushing or bearing engine?
Thanks
Curt
I think a lot of what I experienced had to do with the fact that this is only my second engine, and when I was first learning on the Nexstar I couldn't have known if I had power or if the engine was lagging or anything.
#49
Yup. You can't float the Decathlon around at 1/4 throttle like my Cub or my DragSTAR can. This plane needs air moving over the wings and airframe to make it fly decently (a lot like my F22 Raptor). I don't think overpowering this airframe would have any beneficial results.
She sure is a beautiful looking plane in the air and on the ground. I think I've got a keeper to add to my collection. I still have a weak spot for scale looking and flying planes. The rip snorters are nice for a change but nothing beats flying scale!!
Curt
She sure is a beautiful looking plane in the air and on the ground. I think I've got a keeper to add to my collection. I still have a weak spot for scale looking and flying planes. The rip snorters are nice for a change but nothing beats flying scale!!

Curt



