Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Engine for 4* >

Engine for 4*

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Engine for 4*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2008 | 06:20 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (494)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Palm Bay, FL
Default RE: Engine for 4*

I've owned a Aviaster, the carb is similar to Tower, Chinese random quality control. I sent in the Aviaster, SIG replaced it. Then I had a good engine, but sold it not really seeing the advertised power anyway. OS has the best carbs in the business, and costs a premium.
The Thunder Tiger Pro 46 is a balance between price and quality you won't regret. You might find a used OS or second hand new one, and achieve the OS quality for the TT Pro price.
Old 08-05-2008 | 06:42 PM
  #27  
My Feedback: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,400
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Hemderson, NV
Default RE: Engine for 4*

You brought up A good point about the SK line, I have gotten bit once or twice going for that needel valve. Never drawn blood but I have come home with A red knuckle. When Ed Moorman tested the SK 90 I just had to try one, that sold me on SK. I have had great luck with the PRO series and never had A problem with an OS, even the LA series.
Now then, anyone want to buy some MDS engines cheap????? OK, just fishing!!
Old 08-06-2008 | 05:07 PM
  #28  
chemie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: middle of , MI
Default RE: Engine for 4*

n19ht: Can you post a picture of the bottom for your covering job (or post it here:
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_7799636/tm.htm]http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_7799636/tm.htm[/link]

Graybeard: At risk of getting way off topic, I notice in all your posts you use a cap "A" (vs "a") in middle of the sentence...any reason?
Old 08-06-2008 | 10:04 PM
  #29  
WMB
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Great Falls, MT
Default RE: Engine for 4*

I put the 55/4* in the air this am. 11x5 APC, 12800 ready to fly. Really changed how it flies. Vertical forever!! Fast! Flew it the same way I have been. The manuevors just took a lot more sky. For those that say it is too much, can you ever have enough of a good thing? It certainly doesn't need more. This is just a break in plane for me. The engine will be going on a profile edge. The 4* will be getting the other Saito 45 for fine tuning.

My other planes get my heart pumping, a mellow 4* is fun without needing total concentration.
Old 08-07-2008 | 07:23 AM
  #30  
chemie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: middle of , MI
Default RE: Engine for 4*

SO WMB, you suggest a 46 then?
Old 08-07-2008 | 07:48 AM
  #31  
WMB
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Great Falls, MT
Default RE: Engine for 4*

A 46 will work great.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.