Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Jose,
CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
I have a Saito 100. It recomends a 14 X 10 prop. I could only find a wood 14 x 10 prop.
I found a 14 x 11 plastic prop. Will that work?
What is the difference from a wooded prop Vs. the plastic one.
Thanks.
I found a 14 x 11 plastic prop. Will that work?
What is the difference from a wooded prop Vs. the plastic one.
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
Some plastic props like Master Airscrew are flexible and stand up to abuse. They can also flex under load resulting in loss of efficiency depending on the particular prop. Others, such as APC don't flex much and make a lot of thrust. Unfortunately, they break easier. Maybe not as easy as wood but more so than the Master Airscrews.
There's not real answer as to what material is better. Each material, each manufacturer and each design has advantages and disadvantages. It boils down to the requirements of the specific application and personal preference. Everything has a place.
What plane will you be using it on?
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
Some plastic props like Master Airscrew are flexible and stand up to abuse. They can also flex under load resulting in loss of efficiency depending on the particular prop. Others, such as APC don't flex much and make a lot of thrust. Unfortunately, they break easier. Maybe not as easy as wood but more so than the Master Airscrews.
There's not real answer as to what material is better. Each material, each manufacturer and each design has advantages and disadvantages. It boils down to the requirements of the specific application and personal preference. Everything has a place.
What plane will you be using it on?
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
The ideal prop shape is easier to mold than it is to shape. There are also structural limitations that prevent wood props from being designed as thin as composite or plastic. With props, thinness is good. The saving grace with wood is lightness and the fact that they will break in a crash easier than a key internal engine component will. In the real world of the sport flyer, it boils down to application and personal preferences. I don't think there is a one size fits all answer to which is best.
For the most part, it is hard to beat APC.
For the most part, it is hard to beat APC.
#7
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
Hi!
Saito doesn't recommend 14x10 for All airplanes!!
It certainly isn't suitable for your Extra!
Go with a 14x7, 14x8 or 15x6 APC! Never ever Master A (except the Scimitar series)!!
Saito doesn't recommend 14x10 for All airplanes!!
It certainly isn't suitable for your Extra!
Go with a 14x7, 14x8 or 15x6 APC! Never ever Master A (except the Scimitar series)!!
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
ORIGINAL: ChuckW
There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
#9
Senior Member
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
ORIGINAL: flyinrog
If your still prone to prop strikes, its better to use wood and break a prop than use plastic and damage the engine, first flights, or heavy planes should go with wood.....Rog
ORIGINAL: ChuckW
There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.
Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
I suppose the best way to guarantee no problems is to avoid hitting the prop in the first place though.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Springtown,
TX
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.
don't use a 14X10 prop on that engine, it will load it too much. 14X8 is perfect, and 15X6 is perfect. 15X7 APC MAYBE, but no more.