Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Reload this Page >

Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2008, 10:53 PM
  #1  
Sharksj
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

I have a Saito 100. It recomends a 14 X 10 prop. I could only find a wood 14 x 10 prop.
I found a 14 x 11 plastic prop. Will that work?
What is the difference from a wooded prop Vs. the plastic one.
Thanks.
Old 09-06-2008, 11:16 PM
  #2  
ChuckW
Senior Member
 
ChuckW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.

Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.

Some plastic props like Master Airscrew are flexible and stand up to abuse. They can also flex under load resulting in loss of efficiency depending on the particular prop. Others, such as APC don't flex much and make a lot of thrust. Unfortunately, they break easier. Maybe not as easy as wood but more so than the Master Airscrews.

There's not real answer as to what material is better. Each material, each manufacturer and each design has advantages and disadvantages. It boils down to the requirements of the specific application and personal preference. Everything has a place.

What plane will you be using it on?
Old 09-06-2008, 11:33 PM
  #3  
combatpigg
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
combatpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: arlington, WA
Posts: 20,388
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

The ideal prop shape is easier to mold than it is to shape. There are also structural limitations that prevent wood props from being designed as thin as composite or plastic. With props, thinness is good. The saving grace with wood is lightness and the fact that they will break in a crash easier than a key internal engine component will. In the real world of the sport flyer, it boils down to application and personal preferences. I don't think there is a one size fits all answer to which is best.
For the most part, it is hard to beat APC.
Old 09-06-2008, 11:38 PM
  #4  
ChuckW
Senior Member
 
ChuckW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.


ORIGINAL: combatpigg
For the most part, it is hard to beat APC.
Definitely
Old 09-06-2008, 11:48 PM
  #5  
Sharksj
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

I will be using it on an Extra 300.
Old 09-07-2008, 06:04 AM
  #6  
doubledee
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Callahan, FL
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

APC, for sure. Much larger variety of pitch/sizes.
Old 09-07-2008, 07:19 AM
  #7  
jaka
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

Hi!
Saito doesn't recommend 14x10 for All airplanes!!
It certainly isn't suitable for your Extra!
Go with a 14x7, 14x8 or 15x6 APC! Never ever Master A (except the Scimitar series)!!
Old 09-07-2008, 08:55 AM
  #8  
flyinrog
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 7,183
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.


ORIGINAL: ChuckW

There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.

Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
If your still prone to prop strikes, its better to use wood and break a prop than use plastic and damage the engine, first flights, or heavy planes should go with wood.....Rog
Old 09-07-2008, 01:10 PM
  #9  
ChuckW
Senior Member
 
ChuckW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

ORIGINAL: flyinrog


ORIGINAL: ChuckW

There are good props in both wood and plastic composites.

Wood looks really nice in my opinion and some are very light. On the down side, they aren't as durable as some plastic props. If you are still prone to prop strikes, stay away from wood.
If your still prone to prop strikes, its better to use wood and break a prop than use plastic and damage the engine, first flights, or heavy planes should go with wood.....Rog
I understand your point and the theory behind it. It makes sense but I've seen a lot of Master Airscrew props on trainers, including my own, that flexed when they hit the ground. Damage to the prop is usually minimal and I've never seen it hurt an engine. I've also seen guys go through several wood props in a day and that can get expensive.

I suppose the best way to guarantee no problems is to avoid hitting the prop in the first place though.
Old 09-07-2008, 06:48 PM
  #10  
2slow2matter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Springtown, TX
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Propeller: Wood Vs. Plastic on a gas engine.

don't use a 14X10 prop on that engine, it will load it too much. 14X8 is perfect, and 15X6 is perfect. 15X7 APC MAYBE, but no more.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.