Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Ripmax Trainer 40 >

Ripmax Trainer 40

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Ripmax Trainer 40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2008 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: banbridgenorthern ireland, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Ripmax Trainer 40

Hi,

Anyone any experience with the Ripmax Trainer 40? Could i use a .46 OS engine in there?

Richard
Old 10-28-2008 | 10:29 AM
  #2  
bigedmustafa's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Ripmax Trainer 40

I haven't flown a Ripmax Trainer .40 myself, but it looks like an O.S. .46 LA or AX would be a good match.

Good luck and good shopping!
Old 10-30-2008 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: koropi-athens-attica-greece, GREECE
Default RE: Ripmax Trainer 40

I have the ripmax trainer 40 with os 46 la.It is a very good trainer plane and very sturdy!
My thought is that the 46 la is ok for flying her but if you want to do some aerobatics like large loops cuban 8 ect you have to go with
the ax because i think that she is a litle in heavy side.In inverted flight she wants all the down elevator just to stay level,but landings or flying in windy days is a piece of cake!
Old 10-31-2008 | 03:30 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: ,
Default RE: Ripmax Trainer 40

I've got a Ripmax Trainer 40 with an OS 46AX. Its like they were made for each other. Plenty of power and loops are easy. You have to have almost full power and full down elevator for inverted flight though, but it's only a trainer! Flying it in wind is no problem and its a very sturdy plane so it will handle some bad landings. You have to back off to idle power on final approach otherwise you'll overshoot, but landings don't come around too often because its got a huge fuel tank. The C of G is bang on without any weight added to the nose or tail. One thing though is the pushrod that controls the nosegear likes to bend, so I'd consider beefing that up, and the nosegear itself will bend on heavy landings, but I fly from rough grass strips. All in all its a good plane, I'd recommend it

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.