Futaba FASST 2.4
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Little Egg Harbor,
NJ
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Futaba FASST 2.4
I just finished a new plane and bought a new receiver for the Futaba 2.4 7C system. I linked the tx and the rx and entered a new plane name. I noticed that even with a different name my other plane responds. Is this supposed to happen? I thought that when you select a different plane in the model plane section it would only respond to that plane. Thanks for any input.
#3
Senior Member
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
ORIGINAL: richardgerardi
I thought that when you select a different plane in the model plane section it would only respond to that plane.
I thought that when you select a different plane in the model plane section it would only respond to that plane.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lexington,
KY
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
ORIGINAL: richardgerardi
I just finished a new plane and bought a new receiver for the Futaba 2.4 7C system. I linked the tx and the rx and entered a new plane name. I noticed that even with a different name my other plane responds. Is this supposed to happen? I thought that when you select a different plane in the model plane section it would only respond to that plane. Thanks for any input.
I just finished a new plane and bought a new receiver for the Futaba 2.4 7C system. I linked the tx and the rx and entered a new plane name. I noticed that even with a different name my other plane responds. Is this supposed to happen? I thought that when you select a different plane in the model plane section it would only respond to that plane. Thanks for any input.
You have to verify for yourself that the plane you are actually going to fly is indeed the one set up by name in the transmitter.
One of the other manufacturers takes the additional step of pairing both the transmitter AND receiver by name, but Futaba doesn't....at least not yet. It's a good idea.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
That's definitely normal - I had the same concerns when I first introduced a second model. Providing you have the correct model selected on the TX corresponding to the one you want to fly, you'll be OK. Trust me.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma City,
OK
Posts: 2,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
Yeah, just add a radio id check to your preflight now. I have 5 planes in my Futaba and have to double check all the time. I put them together with reversed throttle on some and normal on others to decrease the chance of setting the wrong plane.
#9
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
You'll be fine with the Futaba. Just add a pre-flight check to your list. Way back when I got my first computer radio I flew once with the wrong plane selected, wound up with the ailerons reversed. As you can imagine, the flight didn't last too long. Ever since then I make it part of my routine to do a control check. Sitting on the runway before applying power to take off I will quickly run through and make sure that my controls are correct.. ailerons, elevator and rudder. Once I'm sure they are correct I will take off.
BTW, you will only ever take off with the wrong plane selected only once!!! After you do it once you'll never make that mistake again!!!
Ken
BTW, you will only ever take off with the wrong plane selected only once!!! After you do it once you'll never make that mistake again!!!
Ken
#10
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
Spektrum has a "Patent Pending" on that feature. It's nice but not mandatory. People have been successfully flying computer radios under these conditions for well over a decade by just being careful. And there are others that will screw up no matter how many safe-guards you install. Engage brain and then the radio is the best sequence.
#11
My Feedback: (-1)
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
Pearls of Wisdom from Bruce!!! I keep from 6 to 9 planes programmed in my 9-C Futaba and so far I have never taken up the wrong plane. I have started the wrong plane A number of times though before I started doing A pre flight check. I do that anyway with all radios and planes these days, don't care if it's A DX7 or 9303.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: middle of ,
MI
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
While we are on the subject, can someone explain how the binding works?
Does the Rx have a unqiue ID and the Tx then sends out it's instructions tied to that ID?
Or does that Tx have a unique ID and the Rx only "listens" to that Tx?
I am wondering from the point of view of multiple Tx and multiple Rx how it is kept straight.
Does the Rx have a unqiue ID and the Tx then sends out it's instructions tied to that ID?
Or does that Tx have a unique ID and the Rx only "listens" to that Tx?
I am wondering from the point of view of multiple Tx and multiple Rx how it is kept straight.
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bloomington,
MN
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST 2.4
I'd suggest checking the controls (and the model selection!) well before getting to the runway. The best time is before you start the engine. You don't want to discover that you have the wrong model when your engine starts at 3/4 throttle rather than 1/4 throttle! It's easy to see the throttle position with an upright two-stroke that's not in a cowl, but other engine mountings can make it hard to visually check that.
I really do like the Model Match feature. Yes, thinking is important. Yes, checklists (paper or otherwise) are important. But we all get complacent, we all make mistakes, and we all think we know which model memory our transmitter is set to. Nobody needs Model Match, but we all screw up. It's one less area where something can go wrong. That's never a bad thing.
I really do like the Model Match feature. Yes, thinking is important. Yes, checklists (paper or otherwise) are important. But we all get complacent, we all make mistakes, and we all think we know which model memory our transmitter is set to. Nobody needs Model Match, but we all screw up. It's one less area where something can go wrong. That's never a bad thing.