Factory settings for an OS 40 FP??
#6
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Middletown,
CT
Thank you. It is a new motor. Well, it's an older motor, but never fired. Bought it from someone on a Superstar and just wanted to make sure to break it in properly.
#8

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: ChelmsfordEssex, UNITED KINGDOM
ORIGINAL: shanet75
Thank you. It is a new motor. Well, it's an older motor, but never fired. Bought it from someone on a Superstar and just wanted to make sure to break it in properly.
Thank you. It is a new motor. Well, it's an older motor, but never fired. Bought it from someone on a Superstar and just wanted to make sure to break it in properly.
I've had one since 1983 and it still runs OK. The idle behaviour (5% nitro, 18% oil, sea level) is just super. I used 3 1/2 turns for first start.
#10

My Feedback: (11)
If you have an early version of the .40 FP, you will need to run a fuel with castor oil and run it very, very rich for the first 45-60 minutes. The early versions had the iron alloy piston running in a steel liner, and they'd take a while to break in. Once broken-in, though, they were super, super engines with ultra-reliable running habits.
You can tell if you have one of those if they tend to quit as soon as you try to lean it during the first 10-15 minutes. They did not at all like to be run with fuels that had all-synthetic oil packages.
Starting points are 2-1/2 turns out from closed on the high-speed needle, and the air-bleed screw set to block the air-bleed hole 1/2-way. You then adjust as necessary.
You can tell if you have one of those if they tend to quit as soon as you try to lean it during the first 10-15 minutes. They did not at all like to be run with fuels that had all-synthetic oil packages.
Starting points are 2-1/2 turns out from closed on the high-speed needle, and the air-bleed screw set to block the air-bleed hole 1/2-way. You then adjust as necessary.
#12

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rye Brook,
NY
Shanet, I definitely second what BAX said. This engine is one of the smoothest, most powerful .40 I have ever run. At least use a fuel with a castor blend for lubrication, and give it plenty air time rich, then lean it after each tank. If you break this engine in right, it will serve you very well for a long time!
#14

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rye Brook,
NY
Not kidding...I say what I mean/mean what I say.
Of the.40's that I had, It was the best.
Exclude the AX.46 of course. Just the .40 size.
Now you can tell us about all the other .40s that blow it away.
Of the.40's that I had, It was the best.
Exclude the AX.46 of course. Just the .40 size.
Now you can tell us about all the other .40s that blow it away.
#15

My Feedback: (1)
The FP is a very nice handling engine, but it's no powerhouse. Mild timing (even by OS standards) and it's small carb inlet make it so easy to operate and tune, but severely limit it's power. I can't think of any engine with less power made in the last 40 years other than the LA series.
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
i have one and it runs just fine, it isnt a powerhouse but it doesnt seem to mind big props. i have a apc 12x4 on it (10500 rpm), it spools up just fine and runs well in general. it will, quite literally, idle all day long. it hardly uses any fuel (6oz in 30 min about half throttle) but it will leave a HUGE mess all over your plane.
#17

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: ChelmsfordEssex, UNITED KINGDOM
ORIGINAL: HighPlains
The FP is a very nice handling engine, but it's no powerhouse. Mild timing (even by OS standards) and it's small carb inlet make it so easy to operate and tune, but severely limit it's power. I can't think of any engine with less power made in the last 40 years other than the LA series.
The FP is a very nice handling engine, but it's no powerhouse. Mild timing (even by OS standards) and it's small carb inlet make it so easy to operate and tune, but severely limit it's power. I can't think of any engine with less power made in the last 40 years other than the LA series.
As you observed though, lovely to operate, quite economical on fuel.
Thinking back, I did use castor fuel at 20% for the first 5 years of its life. I use ML70 now which produces less mess.
The Irvine Sport 40 though just blew the socks off an OS40FP.
#18

My Feedback: (1)
Well I do have a twin plug Merco .49 that I haven't ran yet, for a vintage project.
And I do like the Irvines. To bad they are no longer made (in England).
(4) .36
(1) .40
(1) .45
(3) .53
I guess I like the Irvines a lot. Maybe the best sport motors ever made.
And I do like the Irvines. To bad they are no longer made (in England).
(4) .36
(1) .40
(1) .45
(3) .53
I guess I like the Irvines a lot. Maybe the best sport motors ever made.



