What next after a trainer?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Staten Island, NY
What recommendations do you have for the next airplane after a trainer. I was told the world model super sports was the one to buy. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Charlie
Charlie
#3
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MI
Depending on whether you want something to build, or an arf, I would try a Four Star 40 or sixty, or a Great Planes Super Sportster arf. Good flyers, good low speed characteristics. The sixty sized Stinger isn't a bad choice either.
#7
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kessel, BELGIUM
I recently purchased a GP Easy Sport
It's not a low wing, but not a high wing either, more like a shoulder/mid wing. Is semi-symmetrical airfoil with some dihedral.
Well, to say, I just love this plane. it's great, you can do almost anything with it, loops, rolls, knife edge. I can fly it inverted the entire flight if I would want to....
And yet it has no bad tendencies, stalls are pretty straightforward, the nose drops, speed is again incremented, and the plane just continues to fly.
For some reason, I managed to get it into a flat spin the other day. Well, just applied full throttle, corrected with some rudder, and pulled out without any problems.
And, it's a strong plane! had to crashes during landing approach (my mistake - this plane does need some more speed in approach than a trainer, which floats in.... this one need to be "flown in") but with no damage at all.
Last I landed, but got a little short on the end of the field, and the front landing gear got caught into som high grass, making the plane tip over and smash onto the field onto it's back. No damage! Refueled and took off again !!
I have about 15 flights on in now, with still no damage, and it's great.
It's not a low wing, but not a high wing either, more like a shoulder/mid wing. Is semi-symmetrical airfoil with some dihedral.
Well, to say, I just love this plane. it's great, you can do almost anything with it, loops, rolls, knife edge. I can fly it inverted the entire flight if I would want to....
And yet it has no bad tendencies, stalls are pretty straightforward, the nose drops, speed is again incremented, and the plane just continues to fly.
For some reason, I managed to get it into a flat spin the other day. Well, just applied full throttle, corrected with some rudder, and pulled out without any problems.
And, it's a strong plane! had to crashes during landing approach (my mistake - this plane does need some more speed in approach than a trainer, which floats in.... this one need to be "flown in") but with no damage at all.
Last I landed, but got a little short on the end of the field, and the front landing gear got caught into som high grass, making the plane tip over and smash onto the field onto it's back. No damage! Refueled and took off again !!
I have about 15 flights on in now, with still no damage, and it's great.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: chatsworth,
CA
Mine was the easy sport as well. It was a great plane, Took a lot more abuse than should have been dished out. It was an aerobatic trainer for me. It flew really well in the air, and i used to wait until i ran out of fuel i liked that plane so much. that says a lot considering my flying field is on top of a hill and there is almost always wind. But, as time went on, i went looking for a competition plane..... looking back, i conldn't have done anything else. I would buy that plane, and i will defend my opinion with my life.
#12
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kessel, BELGIUM
The easy sport is actually an updated version of the ugly stick. So not much difference between them I guess.
Spaceclam, what do you mean "It flew really well in the air" ? Do you fly your planes in anything else than air ? Underwater perhaps ?
Spaceclam, what do you mean "It flew really well in the air" ? Do you fly your planes in anything else than air ? Underwater perhaps ?
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (37)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: waukesha,
WI
I bought the tower hobbies voyager for my second plane (1st low wing). It was dirt cheap (around $80), it looks nice, and it flies great. Best of all, you don't feel too bad if you crash it. I agree the sig 4* is a great plane but it also costs nearly $200 for the ARF. I would go for something cheaper so you can get more hours in.
#15
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lanesville, IN
My second plane was a Kaos .40 ARF. Dialed down the travels till I got use to it. Made nice slow speed landings and I love it, but then again, all the suggestions made are good ones to.
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rochester,
NY
I been flying a traier and last week a flew a SIG four Star 40 and it was easy to fly, take off and land... loops rolls knife edge... super plane... Will be my next plane for sure... mabe 60 size four star... good luck My vote SIG Fur Star
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: chatsworth,
CA
Then there is a reason the easy sport is more expensive. I have found the thing is really rugged. I have trashed many nosegears and the plane is still fine. You can also make it a taildragger if you want, it has instructions for it just in case.
#22

My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Woodlands, TX
well I started solo flights two weeks ago and the four star 40 is being built, I decided on it after seeing this http://www.renderwurx.com/rc/sig4star/
Looked nice, I kept his advice and putting 46FX on it, it should fly nice. I am going to use his trim scheme, it is so nice.
the kit is easy built and laser cut parts is for sure makes life easier. If this will be your first kit as mine and don't have any building tools go with and ARF 60, man for the building tools I paid almost $200, can't cover without an iron or heat gun costs $30 2 rolls of monokote $24, trim solvent $6 and the list goes goes and goes.
Well after all I am starting this hobby new and I am planning to built my planes, I like doing so tools will pay of on the long run.
Looked nice, I kept his advice and putting 46FX on it, it should fly nice. I am going to use his trim scheme, it is so nice.
the kit is easy built and laser cut parts is for sure makes life easier. If this will be your first kit as mine and don't have any building tools go with and ARF 60, man for the building tools I paid almost $200, can't cover without an iron or heat gun costs $30 2 rolls of monokote $24, trim solvent $6 and the list goes goes and goes.
Well after all I am starting this hobby new and I am planning to built my planes, I like doing so tools will pay of on the long run.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: chatsworth,
CA
Have You Gone Mad!? it takes more tools to build a kit than an arf .60. An arf 60 is just a bit bigger, and uses the same tools as an arf 40. It will take more tools to build any kit than it will to build any arf.
#25

My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Woodlands, TX
Originally posted by Spaceclam
Have You Gone Mad!? it takes more tools to build a kit than an arf .60. An arf 60 is just a bit bigger, and uses the same tools as an arf 40. It will take more tools to build any kit than it will to build any arf.
Have You Gone Mad!? it takes more tools to build a kit than an arf .60. An arf 60 is just a bit bigger, and uses the same tools as an arf 40. It will take more tools to build any kit than it will to build any arf.
So thats why I am recomending an ARF.
I believe my mistake for the confusion.
btw 4* has ARF for 60 and kits for 40, 60 and 120



