![]() |
monocote
Is it me or doesn't monocote shrink like it use to?[:o]
|
RE: monocote
I switched to Ultracote and 21st century fabric. I only use mono when I am doing windex trim.
|
RE: monocote
Thanks Irish, I'll give u-cote a try:D
|
RE: monocote
New monokote sucks. Big time. The only time I use monokote anymore is if I pick up older rolls at swap meets. The new stuff is absolute garbage IMO. Ultracote FTW!!!
|
RE: monocote
I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build.
|
RE: monocote
I love Monokote. But I think they have serious quality-control problems, so I've mostly switched to Ultracoat and 21st Century film.
|
RE: monocote
I seem to prefer Ultracote to Monocoat, I feel that the Ultra shrinks better for me. The Mono has a lot more "rubbery" feel to it at the shrink stage. I used it on my Topflite Thunderbolt, but then scuffed it up and shot Warbird Colors paint over it because I wanted better colors. It's several years old now, and still looks ok.
|
RE: monocote
About 15 years ago Mono started changing there formula and started having a lot of problems. I changed over to Ultra and have never botherred buying another roll of Mono. I do have quite a bit of it on hand that just sort of finds it's way into my shop. I still like it for trim work and use the Windex trick to lay the trim sheets down.
|
RE: monocote
I prefer Monocoat [X(]
|
RE: monocote
ORIGINAL: shd3920 I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build. Kurt |
RE: monocote
ORIGINAL: Bozarth ORIGINAL: shd3920 I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build. Kurt So keep your insults to yourself!!! |
RE: monocote
ORIGINAL: JohnBuckner I prefer Monocoat [X(] |
RE: monocote
ORIGINAL: shd3920 ORIGINAL: Bozarth ORIGINAL: shd3920 I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build. Kurt So keep your insults to yourself!!! Oh, you "worded it wrong." Ok. Kurt |
RE: monocote
Is that it?, I just got my popcorn and coffee. Well, I'm gonna search windex trim then.
|
RE: monocote
Yup. That's about it. I'm shutting this one down, folks.
|
some of the Monocote colors don't shrink as well as others. I have a dark red that was my first monocote job and a bear to get tight in some of the looser spots that just wouldn't lay down decent..... those spots I knew I would have to rely on really shrinking the film to get a good cover job. later, I learned that the dark red I used, was one of the most problematic colors.
|
I want to re cover a couple models and wondered which way I should go. Maybe I'll try Ultracote but would love to try something else like the silkspan mentioned above
|
It's an old thread, but I'll chime in. I used Ultracote for years after finding it easier to apply than Monokote. Every plane I never did had sagging covering, wrinkles, and lifted seams pretty quickly. Mind you, I fly in Texas so the summer heat is pretty harsh. I've even had seams lift on the first day out. Yes, I do get dust off and clean the covering before I stick down another layer. I was tired of having to repair my covering job after every day of flying, so I tried Monokote again. I covered a classic pattern plane, which I fly a lot, back in the spring. I ironed down my first lifted seam this month. Maybe Monokote changed back to their old formula, or maybe Ultracote is different than it used to be. But the performance speaks for itself. The only downside is that the Monokote doesn't stretch as easily.
|
I agree that Monokote is more difficult to use but IMO is well worth the extra effort. If done correctly will not loosen up. I have found the metallic colors to be easier to use then the opaque colors but have not had any real issues with either. I first started using Monokote in the late 1970's and although it has changed some it still is the only covering that gives the results I require. |
I got several bad rolls of Monokote some years ago (8 or 10, maybe), but lately it seems to be better. It does pay to get it as tight as possible when you first apply it, because it doesn't shrink all that much. Many years ago you could get away with sticking it on pretty much any way and hitting it with the heat gun. No longer.
|
Having used Monokote and Ultracote/Oracover, I prefer Monokote. So far, the only color that's difficult to stretch is a 30 year old roll of Dove Gray - it has the black and white photo instruction sheet with a guy in shirt and tie.
Ultracote doesn't stick well to itself, doesn't trim as well as Monokote (the adhesive layer separates from the pigment during cuts), it has a smaller color selection, isn't as glossy, and creases can't be removed with heat. Also has no metallic or flats. Covering, graphics, and trim are all Top Flite Monokote on these airplanes: >>> https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...be34002c97.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...a1b98de508.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...fb6e4cc7d7.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...d2d688245b.jpg Disappointed with Forest Green going away. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.