Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 monocote >

monocote

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

monocote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2012 | 08:42 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fayette, OH
Default monocote

Is it me or doesn't monocote shrink like it use to?[]
Old 03-09-2012 | 08:45 AM
  #2  
goirish's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Litchfield, MI
Default RE: monocote

I switched to Ultracote and 21st century fabric. I only use mono when I am doing windex trim.
Old 03-09-2012 | 08:53 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fayette, OH
Default RE: monocote

Thanks Irish, I'll give u-cote a try
Old 03-09-2012 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
blueapplepaste's Avatar
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lewisville, TX
Default RE: monocote

New monokote sucks. Big time. The only time I use monokote anymore is if I pick up older rolls at swap meets. The new stuff is absolute garbage IMO. Ultracote FTW!!!
Old 03-09-2012 | 12:34 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsfield, MA
Default RE: monocote

I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build.
Old 03-09-2012 | 02:29 PM
  #6  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Granger, IN
Default RE: monocote

I love Monokote. But I think they have serious quality-control problems, so I've mostly switched to Ultracoat and 21st Century film.
Old 03-09-2012 | 04:22 PM
  #7  
bingo field's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,732
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Mt. Morris, NY
Default RE: monocote

I seem to prefer Ultracote to Monocoat, I feel that the Ultra shrinks better for me. The Mono has a lot more "rubbery" feel to it at the shrink stage. I used it on my Topflite Thunderbolt, but then scuffed it up and shot Warbird Colors paint over it because I wanted better colors. It's several years old now, and still looks ok.
Old 03-09-2012 | 04:54 PM
  #8  
My Feedback: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,400
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Hemderson, NV
Default RE: monocote

About 15 years ago Mono started changing there formula and started having a lot of problems. I changed over to Ultra and have never botherred buying another roll of Mono. I do have quite a bit of it on hand that just sort of finds it's way into my shop. I still like it for trim work and use the Windex trick to lay the trim sheets down.
Old 03-09-2012 | 07:15 PM
  #9  
JohnBuckner's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,441
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Kingman, AZ
Default RE: monocote

I prefer Monocoat [X(]
Old 03-09-2012 | 09:04 PM
  #10  
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Aurora, CO
Default RE: monocote


ORIGINAL: shd3920

I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build.
Never used it but you call it monosucks? The wonderful dumbing down of America.

Kurt
Old 03-09-2012 | 09:13 PM
  #11  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsfield, MA
Default RE: monocote

ORIGINAL: Bozarth


ORIGINAL: shd3920

I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build.
Never used it but you call it monosucks? The wonderful dumbing down of America.

Kurt
Watch who you are calling dumb . . . I worded it wrong. What I meant was I have tried it a couple times with no success, I could not get it to stick or shrink properly, was very hard to handle, causing me to remove it and throw away the remainder of the rolls because it sucked. I have not used it to the point where it stayed. I went to Ultracote and it worked beautifully, went on smooth, and shrunk perfectly. I have never gone back.

So keep your insults to yourself!!!
Old 03-09-2012 | 09:30 PM
  #12  
davidgeorge212's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Trussville, AL
Default RE: monocote


ORIGINAL: JohnBuckner

I prefer Monocoat [X(]
I know right. Clearly the best hands down.
Old 03-09-2012 | 10:29 PM
  #13  
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Aurora, CO
Default RE: monocote


ORIGINAL: shd3920

ORIGINAL: Bozarth


ORIGINAL: shd3920

I have never used monosucks, I mean monokote. I only use Ultracote, the stuff is great. But I plan on trying a silkspan and dope finish on my current build.
Never used it but you call it monosucks? The wonderful dumbing down of America.

Kurt
Watch who you are calling dumb . . . I worded it wrong. What I meant was I have tried it a couple times with no success, I could not get it to stick or shrink properly, was very hard to handle, causing me to remove it and throw away the remainder of the rolls because it sucked. I have not used it to the point where it stayed. I went to Ultracote and it worked beautifully, went on smooth, and shrunk perfectly. I have never gone back.

So keep your insults to yourself!!!

Oh, you "worded it wrong." Ok.

Kurt
Old 03-10-2012 | 03:11 AM
  #14  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eaton Rapids, MI
Default RE: monocote

Is that it?, I just got my popcorn and coffee. Well, I'm gonna search windex trim then.
Old 03-10-2012 | 04:00 AM
  #15  
CGRetired's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,999
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Galloway, NJ
Default RE: monocote

Yup. That's about it. I'm shutting this one down, folks.
Old 10-11-2018 | 06:49 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

some of the Monocote colors don't shrink as well as others. I have a dark red that was my first monocote job and a bear to get tight in some of the looser spots that just wouldn't lay down decent..... those spots I knew I would have to rely on really shrinking the film to get a good cover job. later, I learned that the dark red I used, was one of the most problematic colors.
Old 12-03-2018 | 03:41 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I want to re cover a couple models and wondered which way I should go. Maybe I'll try Ultracote but would love to try something else like the silkspan mentioned above
Old 12-03-2018 | 06:29 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,266
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

It's an old thread, but I'll chime in. I used Ultracote for years after finding it easier to apply than Monokote. Every plane I never did had sagging covering, wrinkles, and lifted seams pretty quickly. Mind you, I fly in Texas so the summer heat is pretty harsh. I've even had seams lift on the first day out. Yes, I do get dust off and clean the covering before I stick down another layer. I was tired of having to repair my covering job after every day of flying, so I tried Monokote again. I covered a classic pattern plane, which I fly a lot, back in the spring. I ironed down my first lifted seam this month. Maybe Monokote changed back to their old formula, or maybe Ultracote is different than it used to be. But the performance speaks for itself. The only downside is that the Monokote doesn't stretch as easily.
Old 12-03-2018 | 08:37 PM
  #19  
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
My Feedback: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,709
Received 204 Likes on 175 Posts
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
Default

I agree that Monokote is more difficult to use but IMO is well worth the extra effort. If done correctly will not loosen up. I have found the metallic colors to be easier to use then the opaque colors but have not had any real issues with either. I first started using Monokote in the late 1970's and although it has changed some it still is the only covering that gives the results I require.
Old 12-04-2018 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Granger, IN
Default

I got several bad rolls of Monokote some years ago (8 or 10, maybe), but lately it seems to be better. It does pay to get it as tight as possible when you first apply it, because it doesn't shrink all that much. Many years ago you could get away with sticking it on pretty much any way and hitting it with the heat gun. No longer.
Old 12-09-2018 | 09:46 AM
  #21  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 935
Received 48 Likes on 46 Posts
From: TN
Default

Having used Monokote and Ultracote/Oracover, I prefer Monokote. So far, the only color that's difficult to stretch is a 30 year old roll of Dove Gray - it has the black and white photo instruction sheet with a guy in shirt and tie.

Ultracote doesn't stick well to itself, doesn't trim as well as Monokote (the adhesive layer separates from the pigment during cuts), it has a smaller color selection, isn't as glossy, and creases can't be removed with heat. Also has no metallic or flats.

Covering, graphics, and trim are all Top Flite Monokote on these airplanes: >>>









Disappointed with Forest Green going away.

Last edited by H5606; 12-09-2018 at 10:02 AM. Reason: Additions

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.