RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Beginners (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/beginners-85/)
-   -   Some interesting reading (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/beginners-85/6311216-some-interesting-reading.html)

CGRetired 08-31-2007 01:39 PM

Some interesting reading
 
You guys want some interesting reading?

Take a look here:

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/Month.asp

aerowoof 08-31-2007 04:59 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
kind of vague on the causes.I looked up the crash of the Delta dc-9 that crashed at logan on boston on july 31,1973 and all it said as cause was collision with object.It actually came in short and hit the seawall before the runway.

RCKen 08-31-2007 05:25 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 


ORIGINAL: aerowoof

.It actually came in short and hit the seawall before the runway.
Well that definitely sounds like it hit an "object"!!!! :D:D:D

Ken

CGRetired 08-31-2007 08:01 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
Some of the older ones are very vague. The ones that start, I believe, somewhere in the 80's begin to get more detail. 9-11 is there. but the NTSB refuses to post details.

There are others that are pretty interesting. I was particluarly interested in some of the 'incursions' that have been on the news lately. There are quite a few that were reported and listed.

Insanemoondoggie 08-31-2007 08:39 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
Believe it or not. Thats pretty much the way it`s done. Stuff like geese strikes happen everyday, but maybe I`m not following what up ?

Insanemoondoggie 08-31-2007 08:43 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
O.K , Took the time to look a little farther. I`m going to have to sit this one out, This is just the tip of the iceberg.

CGRetired 09-01-2007 04:09 AM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
Hey Moondoggie.. I am not sure I follow your posts. Are you asking a question? [ follow what up? ] and your next post. My reply just defines about where the descriptions become more detailed rather than the older types that look like answers to a questionnaire or something. Looks like they changed the format of the report descriptions in January, 1982 because from there on, they become more descriptive. Some of the foreign ones are cryptic, as are some of the ones still under investigation, or as in the case of 9-11, they refuse to put information out.

CGr

Insanemoondoggie 09-01-2007 06:06 AM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
Sry CGR. I meant , to say . I was in the aviation trades a long time and would get myself in trouble , by making any comments.
I have free flight benerfits on several major airlines but have`nt flown since 9-11 . I have my reasons .
When I saw the reports , got me to thinking about stuff you don`t hear about and how much problems it would cause for me, if I opened my mouth. about it.
Sry , got a little wound up.

CGRetired 09-01-2007 06:34 PM

RE: Some interesting reading
 
No sweat, Moondoggie. I certainly understand.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.