![]() |
longer deflector
would it be possible to make the muffler deflector really long? I want to add a rubber tune to go to the back of the plane. I wonder if this would affect the performance or the engine.
|
RE: longer deflector
I did something similar once. I used a piece of thin-walled aluminum tubing that was attached to the fuse. It was 1/2" I.D. tubing, but the muffler exhaust was only about 3/8" O.D. so it had about 1/8" of clearance. Being attached to the fuse held it in place.
There was no power loss at all. Now, on the other hand, I have used those silicon DuBro muffler extensions and suffered a noticeable power loss. So I don't know if (On the aluminum system) it was the larger diameter, or the openings at both ends or both, but it worked like a charm. |
RE: longer deflector
Yes, it will absolutely affect the performance if you put a deflector that long on the engine. The effects can range from a reduction in power to the engine not running at all.
Ken |
RE: longer deflector
I had an older man that has been in the hobby for like 40 years tell me that it will cause power loss and may cause the engine to run lean and may cause it to burn up. I dont know my self but thats what this guy told me. I have tried the rubber ones that are about 3 inches on my OS 46fx and it did fine. He said that the long ones can cause trouble.
|
RE: longer deflector
I have a friend with a tube that's perhaps a bit over a foot long on one of his models. Try it and see what happens. Experimentation is fun!
|
RE: longer deflector
I made a makeshift exhaust system on a 40 trainer that went straight down the fuse from the the muffler and dumped under the plane. Needless to say the plane ran but lost almost 1800 rpm. So I got rid of the exhaust system.
|
RE: longer deflector
Four strokes are not as sensitive to long exhausts as two strokes are
|
RE: longer deflector
ive see some guys run extensions and strapped to the landing gear, but it was a large diameter so it really didnt affect the performance....its kinda like tring to breath out of a coffee straws versus a standard one
|
RE: longer deflector
The famous engine guru in the magazines Clarence Lee when he tests engines, he runs the exhaust into an old car muffler. It doesn't effect the output of the engine because of its size.
He has neighbors right beside his car garage |
RE: longer deflector
I ran clear rubber tubing off the back of my trainers muffler down under the main gear, and it seemed to work great until the tubing fell off.:D I'm gonna try it again with a nice hose clamp.
|
RE: longer deflector
ORIGINAL: w8ye The famous engine guru in the magazines Clarence Lee when he tests engines, he runs the exhaust into an old car muffler. It doesn't effect the output of the engine because of its size. He has neighbors right beside his car garage I did run a couple of tanks through my new TTPro 61 at home but I'm sure the neighbors were annoyed... Any other ideas for noise reduction at home just for breaking in the engine? I guess performance wouldnt be an issue in this case (just break in running) ??? Steve |
RE: longer deflector
There's prop noise also. You run a 10-6 MAS on a OS 46 FX with a Tower 46 muffler and the prop can make as much noise as the engine.
|
RE: longer deflector
Thats a great idea.[sm=thumbup.gif]
|
RE: longer deflector
ORIGINAL: brett65 I ran clear rubber tubing off the back of my trainers muffler down under the main gear, and it seemed to work great until the tubing fell off.:D I'm gonna try it again with a nice hose clamp. |
RE: longer deflector
1 Attachment(s)
ORIGINAL: brett65 I ran clear rubber tubing off the back of my trainers muffler down under the main gear, and it seemed to work great until the tubing fell off.:D I'm gonna try it again with a nice hose clamp. My brother and I have both extended the exhaust on our Bipes with rubber extensions and aluminum tube to the landing gear to keep the slime off. He is running a GMS .76 and I was running a GMS .76 and a TT .91 4 st and they all seemed to work well with the exhaust extended. Just got lucky I guess. |
RE: longer deflector
You guys just need to switch to 4-strokes. They burn less fuel and make less mess.
Hell, most of the time I don't even need to clean my plane at the end of the day. |
RE: longer deflector
A four stroke is also less sensitive to an extension. I've seen extensions run all the way past the tail when using four stroke engines. They run fine.
|
RE: longer deflector
sourkrout - that is exacly the set up I was thinking about!!!! so that doesn't interfere with performance?
|
RE: longer deflector
Sourkraut - is your engine 2 stoke or are both, you and your brother's 4 stroke?
Minnflyer: the reason why I don't want to change to 4Stroke is because I've heard they are a lot harder to tune, also, I like that the 2strokes spin faster. But I just hate the mess. I haven't owned a 4stroke yet, but that's what i hear (hard to tune) |
RE: longer deflector
ORIGINAL: alexedit Sourkraut - is your engine 2 stoke or are both, you and your brother's 4 stroke? Minnflyer: the reason why I don't want to change to 4Stroke is because I've heard they are a lot harder to tune, also, I like that the 2strokes spin faster. But I just hate the mess. I haven't owned a 4stroke yet, but that's what i hear (hard to tune) Ken |
RE: longer deflector
different in what way? inlight me please because when it comes to 4st i am clueless
|
RE: longer deflector
You have fallen prey to those people who will find any excuse to avoid trying something new.
A 4-stroke is no harder to tune than a 2-stroke. Many people will also say that 4-strokes need regular valve adjustments - That's a load of bull. I own mostly 4-strokes and have done so for about 20 years. To date, I have adjusted valves twice and one of those times it really didn't even need it. What IS true about 4-strokes is: 1) You should run at least 10% fuel - 15% is better. 2) You must use a 4-stroke glow plug. 3) They cost more than a comparable 2-stroke Now, that having been said, a 91 4-stroke will burn much less fuel than a 60 2-stroke. So if you fly just a few times per week, you can save the extra cost in fuel savings in just one season. And you can say good-bye to that slime on your plane forever! |
RE: longer deflector
Hey MinnFlyer that is what I need a "longer extension" ooops, deflector:D:D
|
RE: longer deflector
No extention, more paper towels.
|
RE: longer deflector
ORIGINAL: RCKen 4-strokes aren't any harder to tune than a 2-stroke is. It's just that you tune them differently. But once you learn how to do it's no big deal. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.