40% 260 vs 300
10-14-2007, 07:42 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lindenhurst,
NY
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
40% 260 vs 300
looking for input on one vs the other. i have a 300 on order, but i love the way my 35% 260 looks and flys. i can't make up my mind! i will be flying it in advanced if that matters. looking for people that have flown both. thanks
10-14-2007, 08:33 PM
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 40% 260 vs 300
Both are amazing planes.
Either one will suit anyone flying IMAC.
I liked my 300 a tad better than my 260 becuase I think I rolled the 300 better.
More side area so less rudder inputs while rolling.
Either one will suit anyone flying IMAC.
I liked my 300 a tad better than my 260 becuase I think I rolled the 300 better.
More side area so less rudder inputs while rolling.
10-15-2007, 05:52 PM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lindenhurst,
NY
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 40% 260 vs 300
i know albert! trouble is i can't make up my mind. and than i start thinking of another 330.i want to talk to dennis about raising the 300 wing a little higher. rob and i keep thinking it may fly even better and it will look more scale like!
10-15-2007, 10:10 PM
#6
My Feedback: (5)
RE: 40% 260 vs 300
T Bob is right. The 300 has the sexiest lines of all!
Don't mess with the wing. It works. This is the first plane I have had that didn't "lose its shine" after the initial "new plane high".
Build the 300 stock, get some heavy duty springs on that tranny and enjoy!
Don't mess with the wing. It works. This is the first plane I have had that didn't "lose its shine" after the initial "new plane high".
Build the 300 stock, get some heavy duty springs on that tranny and enjoy!
