genesis engine
01-01-2008 | 12:02 PM
#2
RE: genesis engine
The Genesis isn't exactly a "classic" model, but I'll take a stab at the question. You are referring to the Chip Hyde model, aren't you?
If it was my airplane (and I had the spare cash [:@]) I would go electric. Though I haven't flown many electrics, I feel that I can get more precise, responsive, and even throttle control with them. The 'spool up' time with an electric motor is virtually nil, and torque is even throughout. The operating weight of the aircraft also stays consistent throughout the flight, so the airplane handles precisely the same no matter how long you've been flying. Longevity is slightly increased because of the reduced vibration from the electric motor.
Just my .02.
If it was my airplane (and I had the spare cash [:@]) I would go electric. Though I haven't flown many electrics, I feel that I can get more precise, responsive, and even throttle control with them. The 'spool up' time with an electric motor is virtually nil, and torque is even throughout. The operating weight of the aircraft also stays consistent throughout the flight, so the airplane handles precisely the same no matter how long you've been flying. Longevity is slightly increased because of the reduced vibration from the electric motor.
Just my .02.
01-01-2008 | 05:25 PM
#3
My Feedback: (50)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bolivia, NC
RE: genesis engine
I have a Genesis with a YS 160 DZ. It's the best pattern plane I've ever had. YS 160 DZ is a great choice as it's the best running easiest handling YS ever I think. I have not flown any electric pattern planes but in looking into possibly converting over to electric I decided not to because of the cost. Price of additional battery charging systems, motors, flight packs, generators(?), controllers was too much for me. I'd make the same decision again today in building another pattern plane.
