Bluejay XLT question
#3

My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Trafford,
PA
It looks like the factory workers were a week or so early with their April fools joke in sending you all those pieces [>:]
As for all that "paper" it almost looks like some sort of instructions...might have to look into the ARF forum for help
As for all that "paper" it almost looks like some sort of instructions...might have to look into the ARF forum for help
#6

ORIGINAL: Jeff Worsham
Hmmmm. I Wonder what happened.....what you got sure looks nice though.
Pack 'er up and send over here. We'll figure out somethin' for it.....
Hmmmm. I Wonder what happened.....what you got sure looks nice though.
Pack 'er up and send over here. We'll figure out somethin' for it.....
Keith, it is obviously defective and will never become a flying aircraft. If Jeff changes his mind, I will take all that scrap off your hands. I'll even pay shipping costs!

Mark
#7
Mark, Calgary is too far west. It's cheaper to ship to Winnipeg. I've got friends in Texas if that's even cheaper.
Jim
Jim
ORIGINAL: mmattockx
Jeff, you beat me to it.
Keith, it is obviously defective and will never become a flying aircraft. If Jeff changes his mind, I will take all that scrap off your hands. I'll even pay shipping costs!
Mark
ORIGINAL: Jeff Worsham
Hmmmm. I Wonder what happened.....what you got sure looks nice though.
Pack 'er up and send over here. We'll figure out somethin' for it.....
Hmmmm. I Wonder what happened.....what you got sure looks nice though.
Pack 'er up and send over here. We'll figure out somethin' for it.....
Keith, it is obviously defective and will never become a flying aircraft. If Jeff changes his mind, I will take all that scrap off your hands. I'll even pay shipping costs!

Mark
#8
Seriously Keith, hows the kit? Are the plans/ instructions intelligible? Is the wood good quality? How do the cores rate? Value overall?
(I love Blue Jay for keeping these kits in production but those loony instructions they include with the Dirty Birdy kit are worse than not having any at all.[sm=spinnyeyes.gif])
Mike.
(I love Blue Jay for keeping these kits in production but those loony instructions they include with the Dirty Birdy kit are worse than not having any at all.[sm=spinnyeyes.gif])
Mike.
#10

My Feedback: (17)
ORIGINAL: klhoard
I thought the box was a little small, but my XLT was never assembled at the factory!! Did anyone else receive an unassembled XLT?
I thought the box was a little small, but my XLT was never assembled at the factory!! Did anyone else receive an unassembled XLT?
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: kaneohe,
HI
ORIGINAL: 8178
Are you saying that you can buy RC aircraft that are already built? What will they think of next? I’d be really ticked off if I bought a kit and someone stole the pleasure of building it from me. Don’t expect that concept will ever catch on with RC flyers.
ORIGINAL: klhoard
I thought the box was a little small, but my XLT was never assembled at the factory!! Did anyone else receive an unassembled XLT?
I thought the box was a little small, but my XLT was never assembled at the factory!! Did anyone else receive an unassembled XLT?
DM
#13
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Collierville,
TN
ORIGINAL: CrateCruncher
Seriously Keith, hows the kit? Are the plans/ instructions intelligible? Is the wood good quality? How do the cores rate? Value overall?
(I love Blue Jay for keeping these kits in production but those loony instructions they include with the Dirty Birdy kit are worse than not having any at all.[sm=spinnyeyes.gif])
Mike.
Seriously Keith, hows the kit? Are the plans/ instructions intelligible? Is the wood good quality? How do the cores rate? Value overall?
(I love Blue Jay for keeping these kits in production but those loony instructions they include with the Dirty Birdy kit are worse than not having any at all.[sm=spinnyeyes.gif])
Mike.
.
I haven't really dug into it since I've been finishing up my 2M Evolution for the 2008 season. The weather is getting right and I need to start practicing for GMA in April. Here is my initial impression. .
.
The wood looks very good and the milling is great, I haven't taken the cores apart to look at them yet. However, the design of this kit uses some very seriously thick lumber so I'm going to be doing alot of milling to thin down some of the planks. The wing sheeting is 3/32" that will be replaced with 1/16". There are also alot of balsa blocks for wing tips, engine cowl, wing fillets, and other places - time to buy new X-acto hollowing blades. The fiberglass canopy is very thick as well, so I'll probably be doing some internal grinding to bring down the weight. It appears that Bluejay could easily use half of the epoxy and fiberglass to make the canopy for this plane. . . Hmmmmmm. . .maybe I'll send it to Mike Hester to have him form up a slick-azz CF canopy. I would like to see someone do a serious redesign of this kit and reduce the wood weight by half - create a fiberglass engine cowl, replace the 3/8" thick formers with balsa/CF sandwich, thinner wing sheeting, thinner fuselage sides, ect.
.
.
The instructions are the same typeset of the original. Sorry, no pictures.
.
.
I'm not trying to be negative about this kit, I am really looking forward to building it and putting too much engine up front. The parts of the kit are very well formed and I'm sure will go together perfectly. I would rate the overall value of the kit as very high, it is just the original design that could use some updating.
.
.
When I start it I'll post pictures and keep everyone updated. I am no master builder by a long shot, in fact when I opened this up it struck me that I haven't built a "kit" in almost four years!! Hopefully other XLT builders will begin posting their progress as well. Maybe we'll also need to rename the thread. . .
.
.
#14
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Collierville,
TN
.
.
I put together the wing sheeting last night. When I weighed the (12) 3/32" sheets provided for the wings, they tipped the scales at 17.5 oz. WOW, over a pound of hard balsa for the sheeting . . . luckily I had 11 sheets of 4" contest balsa from a previous project left over, they weighed in at a total of 6 oz. Knocked 11 oz. of weight off the plane and I haven't even gotten past page 1 of the instructions!!
.
.
Anybody building a deck?
.
.
.
I put together the wing sheeting last night. When I weighed the (12) 3/32" sheets provided for the wings, they tipped the scales at 17.5 oz. WOW, over a pound of hard balsa for the sheeting . . . luckily I had 11 sheets of 4" contest balsa from a previous project left over, they weighed in at a total of 6 oz. Knocked 11 oz. of weight off the plane and I haven't even gotten past page 1 of the instructions!!
.
.
Anybody building a deck?
.
.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: klhoard
.
.
I put together the wing sheeting last night. When I weighed the (12) 3/32" sheets provided for the wings, they tipped the scales at 17.5 oz. WOW, over a pound of hard balsa for the sheeting . . . luckily I had 11 sheets of 4" contest balsa from a previous project left over, they weighed in at a total of 6 oz. Knocked 11 oz. of weight off the plane and I haven't even gotten past page 1 of the instructions!!
.
.
Anybody building a deck?
.
.
.
.
I put together the wing sheeting last night. When I weighed the (12) 3/32" sheets provided for the wings, they tipped the scales at 17.5 oz. WOW, over a pound of hard balsa for the sheeting . . . luckily I had 11 sheets of 4" contest balsa from a previous project left over, they weighed in at a total of 6 oz. Knocked 11 oz. of weight off the plane and I haven't even gotten past page 1 of the instructions!!
.
.
Anybody building a deck?
.
.
----------------------
You're not supposed to build the model from the kit parts. They are heavy duty templates. It took me a decade to figure that out on my own. <G>
Ed Cregger
#16
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Collierville,
TN
.
.
OK, after a year of slacking off I have jumped back into the building of my XLT. Here are a couple photos of my progress so far. As I mentioned previously, the finish of the parts in the kit is outstanding but the weight of some pieces is a little heavy. The thickness of the wood in the kit was determined by the original plans, so I'm replacing some of the wood with thinner stock or composites, and milling out where I can. I also bought a box of lightening holes that I am installing in several parts of the airplane. The firewall and bulkhead #2 weigh over 2.5 oz. combined and are made of 5/8" ply - don't drop it on your foot!! Bulkhead #3 is supplied as 1/4" balsa, replacing that with a piece of fiberglass honeycomb cut its weight in half. The canopy that was supplied in the kit weighs 4.7oz., so I'm going to have to learn how to make another or maybe Dremel out this one.
.
.
This is the first airplane that I have kept a "weight budget". I keep my scale out right next to my building board with a notepad and pen. I know that saving a few grams here and a few grams there doesn't sound like its worth it, but when you start putting all of your parts in a spreadsheet and totalling it up you begin looking for other ways to save weight. Just like a household budget you have your fixed weights - engine, servos, battery, then you have your variable weights - everything else. . ..( Hmmmm, maybe I can run the servos thru the planer and shave a little off the casing).. . .
.
.
BTW - I've heard that Bluejay company has dropped off the radar. . . does anybody have updated info?
.
OK, after a year of slacking off I have jumped back into the building of my XLT. Here are a couple photos of my progress so far. As I mentioned previously, the finish of the parts in the kit is outstanding but the weight of some pieces is a little heavy. The thickness of the wood in the kit was determined by the original plans, so I'm replacing some of the wood with thinner stock or composites, and milling out where I can. I also bought a box of lightening holes that I am installing in several parts of the airplane. The firewall and bulkhead #2 weigh over 2.5 oz. combined and are made of 5/8" ply - don't drop it on your foot!! Bulkhead #3 is supplied as 1/4" balsa, replacing that with a piece of fiberglass honeycomb cut its weight in half. The canopy that was supplied in the kit weighs 4.7oz., so I'm going to have to learn how to make another or maybe Dremel out this one.
.
.
This is the first airplane that I have kept a "weight budget". I keep my scale out right next to my building board with a notepad and pen. I know that saving a few grams here and a few grams there doesn't sound like its worth it, but when you start putting all of your parts in a spreadsheet and totalling it up you begin looking for other ways to save weight. Just like a household budget you have your fixed weights - engine, servos, battery, then you have your variable weights - everything else. . ..( Hmmmm, maybe I can run the servos thru the planer and shave a little off the casing).. . .
.
.
BTW - I've heard that Bluejay company has dropped off the radar. . . does anybody have updated info?
#17

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Carrollton
ORIGINAL: klhoard
.
BTW - I've heard that Bluejay company has dropped off the radar. . . does anybody have updated info?
.
BTW - I've heard that Bluejay company has dropped off the radar. . . does anybody have updated info?
I hope they didn't close up shop, but I just tried to go to their web site and it's no longer there......[&o]
Keep up the great work on your XLT. If you have any question as you go along, this is the place to ask them. The experience and knowledge level of the people in this forum is oustanding ! ! !


David
#18
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Collierville,
TN
Here is the web site I ordered this kit from, but that was over a year ago. . .
http://www.bridiairplanes.com/index.htm
http://www.bridiairplanes.com/index.htm
#20

My Feedback: (3)
What a great way to start a thread! Got me rolling for a while until post 15 or so! 
The more I open up vintage kits, the more I think - what's all this!? A bunch of great templates as Ed puts it!?
I suspect I'll end up doing the same with my Escape when I get around to it. In fact, I'll probably just use the supplied wood to trace over lighter stock and extend/shrink where necessary. Using lite-ply or thinner balsa with CF or FG mat seems like the way to go these days. What I'm not certain of yet is whether using CF "doublers" is actually lighter than using something like a 1/32" ply doubler. If so, is the cost/weight savings considerably higher/lower than using ply? Again, if so, something to start working with otherwise, thin ply is quite nice to work with.
In any event, this will be a great classic/modern hybrid XLT and I'm looking forward to it!
David.

The more I open up vintage kits, the more I think - what's all this!? A bunch of great templates as Ed puts it!?
I suspect I'll end up doing the same with my Escape when I get around to it. In fact, I'll probably just use the supplied wood to trace over lighter stock and extend/shrink where necessary. Using lite-ply or thinner balsa with CF or FG mat seems like the way to go these days. What I'm not certain of yet is whether using CF "doublers" is actually lighter than using something like a 1/32" ply doubler. If so, is the cost/weight savings considerably higher/lower than using ply? Again, if so, something to start working with otherwise, thin ply is quite nice to work with.
In any event, this will be a great classic/modern hybrid XLT and I'm looking forward to it!
David.
#21
I built the XLT about 25 years ago it was heavy about 10lbs with OS 61 VF rear xhaust, but keep in mind pattern planes back in the day where heavy for just 60 size not uncommon 10 to 11 lbs flying weight


