Polyquest Lipos
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Windsor,
CO
Polyquest advertises only serial batteries (no parallel) to obtain higher capacities. So, they simply use higher capacity cells. The advantage they claim is that since you have no parallel cells you do not have to worry about balancing the voltage on cells, etc. I can see this is an advantage, but how big of a deal is it? I've only used 1P Thunderpower batteries to date but now need a 6000mah battery and am wondering if I should switch to Polyquest.
One advantage I can see is that with only two cells I could still use my Triton charger rather than switiching to something such as the Astroflight 109 that can handle more cells (the Thunderpower 6000mah is a 3S4P 12 cell battery).
Any cons to the Polyquest solution?
One advantage I can see is that with only two cells I could still use my Triton charger rather than switiching to something such as the Astroflight 109 that can handle more cells (the Thunderpower 6000mah is a 3S4P 12 cell battery).
Any cons to the Polyquest solution?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: AUBURN,
GA
A 3S4P still would be charged as a 3 cell pack
The problem you will have with the triton is that it will only charge to 2.5Amps If you charge a 6000mAh pack with it it will take about 3 to 3 1/2 hrs to charge. With the astro set for 6amps would take about 1hr and 20 min.
Milton
The problem you will have with the triton is that it will only charge to 2.5Amps If you charge a 6000mAh pack with it it will take about 3 to 3 1/2 hrs to charge. With the astro set for 6amps would take about 1hr and 20 min.
Milton
#6
Banned
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Newberry, FL
ORIGINAL: Tweet
Polyquest advertises only serial batteries (no parallel) to obtain higher capacities. So, they simply use higher capacity cells. The advantage they claim is that since you have no parallel cells you do not have to worry about balancing the voltage on cells, etc. I can see this is an advantage, but how big of a deal is it? I've only used 1P Thunderpower batteries to date but now need a 6000mah battery and am wondering if I should switch to Polyquest.
One advantage I can see is that with only two cells I could still use my Triton charger rather than switiching to something such as the Astroflight 109 that can handle more cells (the Thunderpower 6000mah is a 3S4P 12 cell battery).
Any cons to the Polyquest solution?
Polyquest advertises only serial batteries (no parallel) to obtain higher capacities. So, they simply use higher capacity cells. The advantage they claim is that since you have no parallel cells you do not have to worry about balancing the voltage on cells, etc. I can see this is an advantage, but how big of a deal is it? I've only used 1P Thunderpower batteries to date but now need a 6000mah battery and am wondering if I should switch to Polyquest.
One advantage I can see is that with only two cells I could still use my Triton charger rather than switiching to something such as the Astroflight 109 that can handle more cells (the Thunderpower 6000mah is a 3S4P 12 cell battery).
Any cons to the Polyquest solution?
Using parallel packs affords the electric modeler the ability to configure his batteries as required for a particular plane/motor combination. He may use a 3S pack for his 3D foamy, then parallel 2 or 3 3S packs to make a 3S3P for glider endurance or something of that order. Paralleling packs may also give you a better form factor to fit the packs into a tighter space.



