Community
Search
Notices
Electric General Discussion General Discussion forum about rc electric related aircraft, accessories, flight, tips, etc.

RF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2007 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
Codeblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RF

Hi, I have a myth that i want to turn into a fact, since i have been hearing a lot of commotion on this subject I would really like to know the real answer... The higher the radio frequency the wider the range? I know this is probably very controversial but please give me a common-sense answer, if you want to discuss then go nuts...thanks
Old 03-13-2007 | 09:23 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Issaquah, WA
Default RE: RF

What do you mean by "the wider the range"? Do you mean the distance (range) between the Tx and Rx? Or are you asking about the spacing (range) between channels as the frequency increases?
Old 03-13-2007 | 10:13 PM
  #3  
jdetray's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: RF

If the question is:

Do higher radio frequencies have a greater range than lower radio frequencies?

The answer is a no. In fact, if using equal transmitter power, the exact opposite is true for the frequencies we use in our R/C hobby.

For example, under the right circumstances, signals in the 27 MHz band (used by some R/C planes) can travel around the world. Signals is this band are readily refracted by the ionosphere, making the potential range very long, indeed.

Signals in the 72 MHz band (most popular band for R/C in the USA) will seldom travel so far but can travel up to 2,000 miles or so at relatively modest power levels.

Signals in the new 2.4 GHz band (used by the new Spektrum radios) are essentially line of sight and so do not usually travel beyond the horizon.

Higher transmitter power, more sensitive receivers, and better antennas can all increase range, no matter what the frequency.

- Jeff
Old 03-13-2007 | 10:14 PM
  #4  
Codeblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RE: RF

Thank you so much for that clarification. Would you know where those worldwide radios are sold? I bet they are extremely expensive but I would like to check it out.

Dima
Old 03-13-2007 | 10:46 PM
  #5  
jdetray's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: RF

Dima -

With an ordinary CB radio, which operates in the 27 MHz band, you can occasionally talk to other CBers thousands of miles away. You have to wait for the right conditions, but it happens. More powerful Amateur Radio (Ham) equipment can do this routinely, but an FCC license is required for using Ham equipment.

[link=http://www.hello-radio.org/whatis.html]Click here for more info about Ham Radio.[/link]

- Jeff
Old 03-13-2007 | 11:10 PM
  #6  
Codeblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RE: RF

Seems to me that Ham radios for RC airplanes/cars would not work well worldwide because of all the interference, but is there a kind of a radio that's similar to Spektrum that's impervious to any other RF signal and that is able to reach worldwide?
Dima
Old 03-13-2007 | 11:58 PM
  #7  
jdetray's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: RF

I wasn't suggesting the use of worldwide radio transmissions for R/C!! That would be ridiculous. You asked about the range of different frequencies, and I was providing some examples. For R/C use, we are restricted to relatively low-power transmissions, anyway.

Spread-spectrum technology (which is used in Spektrum R/C equipment) can also used for some Ham radio communications. The benefits are the same -- no intereference.

- Jeff
Old 03-14-2007 | 12:18 AM
  #8  
Time Pilot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Default RE: RF

If there was a radio that could effectively reach worldwide, the question might better be, would we want to let someone with the handle, New World Order, know about it? [&:]
Old 03-14-2007 | 12:31 AM
  #9  
jdetray's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: RF

Now THAT is a good question!

- Jeff
Old 03-14-2007 | 07:25 AM
  #10  
Scar's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Peoria Hts, Il. IL
Default RE: RF


ORIGINAL: New.World.Order

Seems to me that Ham radios for RC airplanes/cars would not work well worldwide because of all the interference, but is there a kind of a radio that's similar to Spektrum that's impervious to any other RF signal and that is able to reach worldwide?
Dima
No.

Dave Olson
Old 03-14-2007 | 08:24 AM
  #11  
Codeblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Default RE: RF

hahaha, ill find out anyway...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.