Community
Search
Notices
Electric General Discussion General Discussion forum about rc electric related aircraft, accessories, flight, tips, etc.

Dc-6.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2003 | 02:39 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pembroke pines, FL
Default Dc-6.....

Gentlemen....I am in the process of converting a CL DC-6 to RC....its roughly 75" WS.......I can power it with OS .25LA's but was considring electric power....What would be a good motor in performance similar to the glows......Also what size batteries would I need to go with them....remembering I'll need 4 of them.......I'm going to make the "Nose" section removeable for easy access.....I would like to be able to turn 8x6 or 9x6 3-balde props in the 10k -11k rpm area.......Bill......
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	67376_12465.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	65.5 KB
ID:	40938  
Old 04-01-2003 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
Matt Kirsch's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spencerport, NY
Default Dc-6.....

You need to approach the problem differently, because simply spinning the same prop as a glow engine at the same RPM as a glow engine is not necessarily the most efficient way to go about powering an electric airplane. The only reason for needing a specific prop diameter and a specific RPM is lack of clearance for anything larger. A properly geared electric motor can actually spin a propeller that's more "scale" at a more scale RPM. Glow motors usually turn propellers that are much too small.

Glow engines waste up to half their power output whipping at the air for no apparent reason. That is, they spin the propellers much too fast to be efficient, which is okay because you can pack so much energy into a relatively small and light tank of fuel. With electrics, you need to make the most efficient use of the juice you have, because there isn't a whole lot of it to spare This often means relegating the 3-blade prop to static display only...

Your 4-engine plane may actually fly, and fly well, on much less Horsepower than four LA .25 engines. The problem is, we'd really need to know more about your plane than its wingspan and engine recommendation. Wing area, and an estimated all-up-weight with glow engines, radio, and fuel load would be a start.

Batteries would be the first thing to look at here. Roughly speaking, the power from 8 to 10 NiCd cells, with the appropriate motor and propeller, will fly a plane like a .25 glow engine. This is a general rule of thumb that really hasn't been properly documented anywhere, and the explanation of how it was determined is very long-winded... I'll save it for later.

Anyway, just estimating roughly, I'd say that because it's a big 4-engine plane, and not meant to do unlimited vertical, you can go with the low end, 8 cells. Each motor needs 8 cells, for a total of 32 cells in the plane. How you arrange that is up to you. You can do a separate 8 cell battery for each motor, two 16-cell batteries each running two motors, or combine all 32 cells into a single pack to run all four motors. If it were a smaller plane, you could even get away with using only 16, or even only 8 cells, depending on how you wire the motors. However, the currents required to power such a large plane far exceed the capacities of the batteries we have now, so I can't recommend less than 32 cells.

From there, you've got all sorts of options for motors. An easy, but expensive, option is four Jeti 30/3 brushless motors, direct drive to your 9x6 3-blade props. It's expensive because the motors are ~$120 each, and each one needs a separate ~$85 controller...
Old 04-01-2003 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pembroke pines, FL
Default DC-6....

MKirsch.....All up weight between 9-10lbs......wing area just over 600 sq ins.........thanks for responding.....Bill.....
Old 04-03-2003 | 03:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lyman, WY
Default Dc-6.....

Bill, you may want to consider lightening the airframe as much as possible. Since electrics don't put out the vibration that their glow counterparts do, you could get away with a much lighter airframe.

As a rough guess without knowing all of the dimentions etc, at 9-10lbs you're looking at a very high stall speed.

IMO with that kind of weight you'll have to go with speed 600's direct drive with maybe 8x6 props.

mkirsch hit it right on the head about wanting to run as big a prop as possible, but with that much weight you may have to stick to direct drive to achieve the pitch speed to fly the plane.

If you could cut the weight to 6-7 lbs you could possibly go to speed 400's with a 2:1 or 3:1 gearbox and run 10 or 12 inch props and take better advantage of the power available.

As an example, I fly a 72"ws twinn with AUW at about 3 3/4lbs on geared 400's. It doesn't fly fast, but is very stable with flights that average about 8 minutes on 16 cells.

Good luck and keep us posted.

Jason
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	67915_19116.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	28.7 KB
ID:	40939  
Old 04-05-2003 | 09:39 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oregon sometimes, Washington Sometimes
Default Dc-6.....

Personally what I'd do on something like that is use 4 geared Speed 400s, geared about 3:1, swinging probably about a 9" prop.

For wiring, I'd wire them in two banks, on two ESC's. The left motors, and the right motors, this way with a computer radio you can mix the two together on two different channels, and slave it to the rudder for differential power. 8 cells per bank of motors would be enough. Run CP1300s or the 1950 nimh cells for long duration.

--Paul

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.