Crystals. What's the difference?
#2
The fundamental frequency of a crystal is not necessarily the same as the eventual received or transmitted frequency. Inside the receiver or transmitter, the fundamental frequency of the crystal is "mixed" with a frequency generated within the receiver or transmitter to produce the actual received or transmitted frequency. The crystal frequency may also be multiplied or divided within the receiver or transmitter.
Since the receiver and transmitter may use different mixing/multiplying/dividing schemes, they may also need crystals with different fundamental frequencies, even when they are on the same channel.
For similar reasons, dual-conversion receivers need different crystals than do single-conversion receivers.
- Jeff
Since the receiver and transmitter may use different mixing/multiplying/dividing schemes, they may also need crystals with different fundamental frequencies, even when they are on the same channel.
For similar reasons, dual-conversion receivers need different crystals than do single-conversion receivers.
- Jeff
#3

My Feedback: (11)
Transmitter crystals are on the transmitted frequency.
Reciever crystals arent.
Here's the long and exciting version of the explanation, don't read it while operating heavy machinery.
http://www.torreypinesgulls.org/radios.htm
Reciever crystals arent.
Here's the long and exciting version of the explanation, don't read it while operating heavy machinery.
http://www.torreypinesgulls.org/radios.htm
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Naersnes, NORWAY
ORIGINAL: BarracudaHockey
Transmitter crystals are on the transmitted frequency.
Transmitter crystals are on the transmitted frequency.
In all radioes I have had the transmitted frequencie is the second harmonic of the TX Xtal...
In the article the author says TX work on 5th harmonic...? Strange.
The author also says you can step up/down 2 channels without retuning TX... This suits neither the strange rules in US, nor the rest of the world.
The authos says the reason for DobbeltSuper/DualConversion is to avoid "noice" from fellow pilots...? The reason why MPX developed DS RC-receivers a lot of years ago was mainly because noice/harmonics from the upper FM-band in Europa caused problems for the 35MHZ RC band. But the author at least do know the problems caused by reduced channel separation for broadcasting...
The author also claim: "Dual Conversion is needed for FM to eliminate in-band interference from other transmitter. " And in an other sentence he claims: "JR has taken note of this and their receivers stick with Single Conversion FM,"
I got myself a good laugh from this article

#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Toronto,
ON, CANADA
Thanks guys
This stuff is stil way above my head.
But i guess ultimately you cannot use a transmitter crytal in the receiver and vise versa?!?
This stuff is stil way above my head.
But i guess ultimately you cannot use a transmitter crytal in the receiver and vise versa?!?
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Naersnes, NORWAY
ORIGINAL: BarracudaHockey
and you shouldnt even use different manufacturers crystals in a reciever unless they are meant for it.
and you shouldnt even use different manufacturers crystals in a reciever unless they are meant for it.
It is even worse in the transmitter; you might be a danger at the field, transmitting on your neighbours frequency in addition.
TX and RX Xtals have different characteristics. In a receiver the Xtal works without changing freq. In the TX the Xtal have to be able to deal with deviation. Deviation is a change in freq, and this is why it is called FM. The frequency is changed to code the signals, or shifthing.



