Which Simulator?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Encino, CA
Hello all.
I'm taking all of your advice here and am planning on buying a flight simulator.
Should I get the:
1.Reflex XTR,
2. FS One,
3. Real Flight
4. Aero Fly???
TY in advance. I downloaded the real flight demo and I'm having fun with it. Is the demo enought or do I have to shell out the green for the full version?
I'm taking all of your advice here and am planning on buying a flight simulator.
Should I get the:
1.Reflex XTR,
2. FS One,
3. Real Flight
4. Aero Fly???
TY in advance. I downloaded the real flight demo and I'm having fun with it. Is the demo enought or do I have to shell out the green for the full version?
#2
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jackson,
CA
I soloed over a year ago without buying or using a simulator. However, in moving to more advanced planes and maneuvers I thought it would be an advantage to practice on one...and the Realflight version includes at least one plane I have but have not yet built. I first ran the dem and found it clumsy to use the keyboard and now that I have the full version don't think the demo is very helpful. I did not want to pay $200 for one but now that v4 is out you can get v3 for around $150 new and I was able to pick up a used copy off this site for $110 including shipping.
Comments: In some ways it is easier to fly than a real plane...for example there is less tendency to bounce on landing, and much less tendency to break off gear in doing so. On the other hand, it is harder (at least for me) to see the plane in the distance due to screen resolution, and landing is a bit dicier as you can't see both the field and the plane at the same time to line up and must therefore use landmarks around the field for turn in points. A decisive plus was that I could learn to do aerobatics flying the Yak 54 and fool around with scale warbirds, flaps, retracts, etc. without buying (and destroying) planes. In fact, I have now added Immelmanns and Split S's to my "real" flying from practice on the sim, and will soon add Cuban Eights. The Realflight system is very comprehensive and well thought out and I recommend it highly (though I have no experience with other systems).
Hope this helps
Comments: In some ways it is easier to fly than a real plane...for example there is less tendency to bounce on landing, and much less tendency to break off gear in doing so. On the other hand, it is harder (at least for me) to see the plane in the distance due to screen resolution, and landing is a bit dicier as you can't see both the field and the plane at the same time to line up and must therefore use landmarks around the field for turn in points. A decisive plus was that I could learn to do aerobatics flying the Yak 54 and fool around with scale warbirds, flaps, retracts, etc. without buying (and destroying) planes. In fact, I have now added Immelmanns and Split S's to my "real" flying from practice on the sim, and will soon add Cuban Eights. The Realflight system is very comprehensive and well thought out and I recommend it highly (though I have no experience with other systems).
Hope this helps
#4

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: East WitteringSussex, UNITED KINGDOM
I've used an FMS E-Sky http://www.sussex-model-centre.co.uk...d.asp?id=19644 one right from the start as I couldn't see the point in shelling 5 times the cost just to get slightly better graphics. As you get more advanced you can then go to
http://www.rc-sim.de/index_en.htm and download any of a number of different planes from there that are far more aerobatic / sensitive which helped me massively before I bought my 1st 3D model.
http://www.rc-sim.de/index_en.htm and download any of a number of different planes from there that are far more aerobatic / sensitive which helped me massively before I bought my 1st 3D model.




