Go Back  RCU Forums > Electric Aircraft Universe > Electric Pattern Aircraft
Caelus Balance & CG Assitance Help >

Caelus Balance & CG Assitance Help

Community
Search
Notices
Electric Pattern Aircraft Discuss epowered pattern aircraft in this forum

Caelus Balance & CG Assitance Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2016 | 06:29 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default Caelus Balance & CG Assitance Help

Howdy,
My Caelus V2 is completed (sorry I do not have a scale to weigh it all) and I understand the balance point is 1/2" behind the trailing edge of the wing tube from what Mike at F3A and many here have stated. In order for the plane to balance I need to move the battery well forward of any other one I've seen or heard of, very strange.

Fuselage is set at Zero,
Wings set at one degree positive
Stab is set at zero
T can is set one degree positive.

In order to maintain level flight it requires several clicks of up elevator, 14 clicks or 2.5 - 3.0 degrees of deflection to maintain level flight. When I roll to inverted it requires plenty of down elevator to maintain level flight. From reading the NSRCA trimming chart it appears to be nose heavy but this is contradictory from what I've read and been told.

Any advice on this would be helpful.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Caleus-01.jpg
Views:	689
Size:	294.5 KB
ID:	2168099   Click image for larger version

Name:	Caleus-02.jpg
Views:	750
Size:	286.2 KB
ID:	2168100   Click image for larger version

Name:	Caleus-03.jpg
Views:	595
Size:	285.9 KB
ID:	2168101  

Last edited by mgosson; 06-15-2016 at 08:01 PM.
Old 06-15-2016 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 432
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Hutto, TX
Default

I have a version 1, but my batteries are way back compared to yours. My balance point is about 210mm from the wing leading edge, or about 3/4 to 1 inch behind the wing tube. I still need a touch of down elevator when inverted.
Old 06-15-2016 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

I guess the V1 was heavier than V2 and the balance point is incorrect as stated in the manual. I tried moving the battery back and it was a handful to land, indicative of a tail heavy plane.
Old 06-15-2016 | 07:38 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 432
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Hutto, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mgosson
Howdy,
My Caelus V2 is completed (sorry I do not have a scale to weigh it all) and I understand the balance point is 1/2" behind the trailing edge of the wing tube from what Mike at F3A and many here have stated. In order for the plane to balance I need to move the battery well forward of any other one I've seen or heard of, very strange.

Fuselage is set at Zero,
Wings set at one degree positive
Stab is set at zero
T can is set one degree positive.

In order to maintain level flight it requires several clicks of up elevator, 14 clicks or 2.5 - 3.0 degrees of deflection to maintain level flight. When I roll to inverted it requires plenty of don elevator to maintain level flight. From reading the NSRCA trimming chart it appears to be nose heavy but this is contradictory from what I've read and been told.

Any advice on this would be helpful.

Then it is nose heavy.
Old 06-16-2016 | 02:40 AM
  #5  
ltc
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Mendon, MA
Default

Just out of curiosity, have you checked the down thrust angle?
Also, how much do those Revolectrix packs weigh?
Old 06-16-2016 | 04:50 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: McLean, VA
Default

I concur with the other posts that your setup is nose heavy. Here's something else to try... you have a +1.0 on the Tcan. Mine was set at 0.2, others have used 0.3. I believe that the more incidence you have on the Tcan the greater nose down pitch to the airplane resulting in the need for more up elevator to trim for level flight. Any lifting force you place on an airplane BEHIND the center of lift always pitches the nose down. I think that the 1.0 on the wings is fine as well as the 0 for the stabs. I also think that the batteries need to be further aft. I completely understand that the V1 and V2 are different, but your plane is doing exactly what mine did on the maiden flight. My solution was changing the Tcan and moving the batteries aft to be inline with the wing adjusters.
Old 06-16-2016 | 05:23 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

The batteries are 521 grams each x 2.
I took the plane up high, cut off the power and pointed nose straight down, half way down the plane tucked toward the canopy. Performed that test twice with the same results.

I do have a bit of an issue with right thrust, that much I do know and I'm working on that this weekend.
Old 06-16-2016 | 05:29 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Ok, I will move the batteries back this evening and try it again. As for the Tcan, its a pretty simple fix to set it at zero or close to it.

I fully agree with what you guys are writing, it's just troubling that it does not follow all the information I've been gathering. I had one of my fellow club members pick up the plane at the recommended CG and he agreed "its tail heavy".
Old 06-16-2016 | 05:42 AM
  #9  
ltc
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Mendon, MA
Default

Perhaps fly it without the Tcan then sort out the plane?
Old 06-16-2016 | 08:45 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

I'm certain you guys are 100 percent correct and it IS nose heavy.
Old 06-16-2016 | 07:17 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Update...
1st flight, I removed the 1.0 oz. lead in the nose and flew it, a little better,
2nd flight, moved the batteries back 1/2" inch and flew it, getting better.
3rd flight, moved the batteries back 1", better, much better.
Landings from 1st to 3rd flight - VAST improvement, not nearly as much elevator needed to maintain a smooth glide.

Took the plane home and measured the CG, it's 1.25" behind the trailing edge of the wing tube.

Thank you for the advice fellas, it really helped, a bunch!

Before and after photos
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Caelus-Battery.jpg
Views:	496
Size:	265.5 KB
ID:	2168282   Click image for larger version

Name:	Caelus-Battery-01.jpg
Views:	594
Size:	352.2 KB
ID:	2168283  

Last edited by mgosson; 06-16-2016 at 07:31 PM.
Old 06-16-2016 | 07:30 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 432
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Hutto, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mgosson
Update...
1st flight, I removed the 1.0 oz. lead in the nose and flew it, a little better,
2nd flight, moved the batteries back 1/2" inch and flew it, getting better.
3rd flight, moved the batteries back 1", better, much better.
Landings from 1st to 3rd flight - VAST improvement, not nearly as much elevator needed to maintain a smooth glide.

Took the plane home and measured the CG, it's 1.25" behind the trailing edge of the wing.

Thank you for the advice fellas, it really helped, a bunch!

Before and after photos
I'm sure you meant the wing tube.
Old 06-16-2016 | 07:32 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 149
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Yes I did, I just corrected the omission

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.