Go Back  RCU Forums > Electric Aircraft Universe > Electric Pattern Aircraft
 question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10 >

question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Community
Search
Notices
Electric Pattern Aircraft Discuss epowered pattern aircraft in this forum

question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2008 | 07:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

I am in the oppertunity to take over a ZNLine Twister which is currently set up for a Hacker C50. I was wondering how much effort it would take to convert this to a Plettenberg EVO 30-10. I cannot imagine it is a drop in replacement!

Or would it be smarter just to copy the setup and buy a Hacker+Opti myself?

Volkert
Old 12-28-2008 | 03:48 AM
  #2  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

In the meantime I found this post on the Plettenberg mount:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=7712315

and here a nice Hacker install:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=3525706

What I haven't found sofar is a clean picture of a install of a Pletty in the spinner. How strong should the nose be to take the load?
Old 12-28-2008 | 02:40 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Hi Volkert,
One year ago I was in exactly the same situation, bought a Synergy from a fellow F3A flyer as a start with electrics. For me it seemed logical then to use the same mount and use the same engine, a Hacker C50. After one year of experience with the Hacker I am not sure if this was the best decision. You have read about it on the Dutch forum.
I'm preparing a new model with a Plettenberg for season 2009. Perhaps some picture are of help.
Hans
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ge95122.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	79.2 KB
ID:	1098244   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xs58596.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	65.6 KB
ID:	1098245   Click image for larger version

Name:	Gl19988.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	112.1 KB
ID:	1098246   Click image for larger version

Name:	Dw65344.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	74.8 KB
ID:	1098247   Click image for larger version

Name:	Bm76481.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	63.0 KB
ID:	1098248   Click image for larger version

Name:	Gx30285.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	77.7 KB
ID:	1098249  
Old 12-28-2008 | 04:05 PM
  #4  
Jason Arnold's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Hi Hans,

Looks like you may have to be very careful with your fuse length using that spinner/motor set-up. Might be pushing the 2 metre limit with some designs.

Cheers
Jason.
Old 12-28-2008 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Thanks Jason, it is quite OK with 198cm
Old 12-29-2008 | 02:38 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Hans, did you specificly strenghten the nose section? If so, in what way? Did you mount the engine on your Abbra or Synergy?

I personally prefer the Plettenberg route even though at this moment the majority of top fliers is with the inrunner/gearbox setup.

Originally the Evo30-10 came with the Schulze controller, now it is sold with the Jeti-99. Any comments on pro's and con's of both controllers?

Volkert
Old 12-29-2008 | 03:16 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Hi Volkert, the model on the pictures is the ABBRA. The Synergy you have seen me flying with in Son, I was the only electric flyer, was equipped with the Hacker. On the pictures you can see the honycomb-plate to mount the controller. This plate has made the nose less prone to torsion. I hope that will be enough.
My experiences with the hacker gearbox is that after cleaning and greasing it starts to make more noise after 15 flights and after 30 flights it looses rpm's. Mainly the latter is unacceptable for me to have a drive that has no constant power output. If it is cleaned and greased again it is OK for the next 30 flights. According to Hacker the grease should become thinner in time and do a better greasing job. When I open the gearbox the grease it is dark gray, thick and in the corners.
On the other hand I like the characteristics of the motor very much. For me as a drive it is superb, the gearbox is not. In one of the posts here about the Neu-motor it was a disappointment for me that they choose for a similar gearbox.
The nex year will learn if the Plettenberg will make me forget the Hacker or that will switch back and take the greasing troubles for granted.
I can only speak of the Jeti. It works without any troubles so far. I have heard form Bert vd Vecht that they switched fom Schulze to Jeti.
Old 12-29-2008 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
can773's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Volkert

If you use a firewall mount like the way I do it then you don't need to add any additional strength. On my Integrals I used 1/4" lite-ply with carbon facing to make it a little more rigid. I have not used the motor in the spinner so I dont know if you need extra strength or not. I think the folding props reduce a lot of the forces on the airframe though, so its probably not as critical.

Both the Schulze and Jeti work fine, the brake is probably the biggest difference. I think the brakes both basically function the same, but the way the user sets them up is quite different. I think the Schulze is a little more work to set up the brake initially, but offers more flexibility once its setup. Either ESC works well though.

Hans,

I can't imagine you will be disappointed with the Pletty! As good performance as the Hacker without any maintenance I still use one of the original prototype motors in my primary model (will be 3 yrs old in July), and it has never let me down.
Old 12-29-2008 | 03:17 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

Hans, Chad, great feedback. Thanks guys!

Volkert
Old 02-04-2009 | 08:11 AM
  #10  
Alexzzz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10


ORIGINAL: wagen017

Hans, Chad, great feedback. Thanks guys!

Volkert
Hi Volkert,

Did you buy the plane?

Are you going to fly pattern-contests again?

Greetz
Old 02-05-2009 | 04:48 PM
  #11  
OhD
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,160
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
From: west hills, CA
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10


ORIGINAL: Hans Meij

Hi Volkert,
One year ago I was in exactly the same situation, bought a Synergy from a fellow F3A flyer as a start with electrics. For me it seemed logical then to use the same mount and use the same engine, a Hacker C50. After one year of experience with the Hacker I am not sure if this was the best decision. You have read about it on the Dutch forum.
I'm preparing a new model with a Plettenberg for season 2009. Perhaps some picture are of help.
Hans
Hans, let us know how this motor installation works out. I'd be tempted to add a bulkhead at the point where one would normally have a firewall. It could have a large hole in it and still add a lot of torsional stiffness to the nose.

Jim O
Old 02-07-2009 | 03:10 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

ORIGINAL: Alexzzz


ORIGINAL: wagen017

Hans, Chad, great feedback. Thanks guys!

Volkert
Hi Volkert,

Did you buy the plane?

Are you going to fly pattern-contests again?

Greetz

Yep, the Twister has a proud new owner!

I will be participating this year although I am not sure to use the Twister immediately for that; maybe next year.

Volkert
Old 02-08-2009 | 04:39 AM
  #13  
Alexzzz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

ORIGINAL: wagen017

Yep, the Twister has a proud new owner!

I will be participating this year although I am not sure to use the Twister immediately for that; maybe next year.

Volkert
Ah nice, then I'll be seeing you a lot this year C-class again?

Greetz.
Old 02-08-2009 | 05:35 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: question on mounting Hacker C50 vs. Plettenberg EVO30-10

C-class first time, actually!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.