Community
Search
Notices
Engine Conversions Discuss all aspects of engine conversions in this forum

Ryobi jug

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2004 | 11:11 PM
  #1  
stgrlee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Overland, MO
Default Ryobi jug

How much can a Ryobi jug be milled and still be dependable?
Old 06-24-2012 | 05:54 PM
  #2  
APLANEGUY's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wayland, NY
Default RE: Ryobi jug

Old post but I figured I'd throw my $.02 out there for anyone wanting to know. I read in a conversion article once that the base of the cylinder on a typical 31cc Ryobi can be milled to increase compression. I also read a suggestion that indicated removing the thick base gasket and replacing it with a thinner one or just fuel proof sealer would also help. In doing so you increase compression and also effectively lower the ports which is good onthe intake side 'cause it opens the port sooner but bad on the exhaust side 'cause the port opens later. To remedy this it was recommened to either take a bit off the top of the exhaust port or remove a little material from the top outer edge of the piston to maintain good port timing. Not having a machine shop I always opt to use a Dremel tooltoremove a bit from the top edge of the piston where it meets the exhaust port. OK, back to the original question. On my first Ryobi conversion I had my brother (a machinist by trade) mill the base of the cylinder .020". When I assembled the engine I also used a VERY thin base gasket (I wanted a little screamer hot rod engine). However, when I screwed the spark plug in and turned the engine by hand I found that the piston was coming up and hitting the plug. Oops. I first considered trying to shim the plug a bit to get it out of the way but it's a tapered seat plug and I really didn't want any sealing issues there and didn't want to mess with a good thing so I left the plug alone. I tried making a little thicker base gasket and there was still contact. Finally I went to a base gasket approximately the thickness of a stock gasket and therewas no interference. I assembled the engine that way and finishedthe conversion. She ran very well like that.That engine ran and ran for hours on the test stand then for approximately 30 flights in an airplane before a servo failure cause a full throttle nose-in and the crank was bent. The cylinder is still on another running engine today. I've done several 31cc Ryobisand I always either have the cylinder milled .020"or go to a really thin gasket to accomplish the same thing. The engines run well and are cheap and easy to convert and a whole lot of fun to work on. My worknets an engine that will turn an 18x8 prop at about 8200rpm on the test stand. I currently have two planes flying with them and a new project that will be a crazytwin with two Ryobi 31s. In my opinion milling .020" (or reducing gasket thickness the same amount) is about the maximum you can go and so far has proven to be very reliable. Compression is really good and my Sullivan starter has all it wants to do to spin onehooked toa 12v lawnmower battery. No signs of detonation or other harmful side effects. I run cheap 87 octane gasoline and keep the fuel mix at 32:1 to make sure things are always lubed well. After seeing what appears to be a rather flimsy connecting rod in these engines I've been rather pleasantly suprised by their longevity. I'll probably eventually blow one up or something but at the low price of replacement it's not really a concern. Especially when I hear stories all the time about purpose built RC engines that don'tlast and are far more expensive. This has been my very long-winded way ofsaying the answer to your question is .020"...

My typical engine mods:
-Mill the cylinder .020"
-Cut/grind the crankcase flanges off (remove anything that made it atrimmer engine)
-Larger carburetor
-Cut away extra plastic from reed valve plate leaving just a rear crankcase cover with reed valve
-If possible use a two ring piston but one works ok too
-Bend the reed valve retainer a little to let it open more
-Grind a bit off the top of the piston to maintain port timing
-Aluminum aftermarket muffler (much lighter... I get mine from wackerengines.com)
-Disgardthe flywheel and magneto in favor of a CDI unit (onshort shaft engines Icut the center out of the flywheel to use as a hub and put the ignition trigger magnet in it)
Old 06-24-2012 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
av8tor1977's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,245
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default RE: Ryobi jug

Look here; tons of info: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_84..._1/key_/tm.htm

I have lowered the cylinder considerably more than .020" many times. And it is best to raise the exhaust port instead of cutting the piston, which just lowers the compression again. You can use a gasketed spark plug in place of the tapered seat plug. (Many engines are interchangeable in this respect.)

There is no piston ported intake port to worry about when lowering the cylinder, it is a rear intake reed valve setup.

Keep the static revs to 7500 if you want the weak stock rod to live.

AV8TOR
Old 06-25-2012 | 04:19 AM
  #4  
w8ye's Avatar
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 37,576
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Shelby, OH
Default RE: Ryobi jug

I've used the gasketed and tapered seat plugs interchangeably in both the Homelite and Ryobi engines
Old 06-25-2012 | 02:12 PM
  #5  
APLANEGUY's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wayland, NY
Default RE: Ryobi jug

Interesting. I wonder now why I had issues with interference. Next one I do I'm gonna have to make some close measurements and look at things again. Maybe it was just a fluke or something. Maybe it was machined more than I asked for. Who knows?...
Old 06-26-2012 | 09:20 AM
  #6  
w8ye's Avatar
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 37,576
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Shelby, OH
Default RE: Ryobi jug

If the plug electrode was hitting, you could use an equivalent non extended tip spark plug.

I have a lot of chainsaws and almost all have the extended tip, resistor NGK BPMR7A spark plug. But some have had non extended tip plugs when I got them used. They seemed to run just fine.

I bought a nice looking chainsaw that had a non extended tip spark plug when I bought it. When I went to change the spark plug, I noticed a mark (dent) on the piston. It was where someone had used a metal piston stop in the engine spark plug hole to change the clutch or something.
Old 06-26-2012 | 10:43 AM
  #7  
av8tor1977's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,245
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default RE: Ryobi jug

Yeah, those metal piston stops scare me. I would never use one for fear I would poke a hole right through a piston. I use a positive stop tool I made to find TDC for timing and porting and such, but there is never any force put on it.

And W8ye is right, (as usual), you can use a normal instead of an extended nose plug. www.sparkplugs.com has tons of info....

AV8TOR

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.