Q-500 versus Diamond dust
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Q-500 versus Diamond dust
O.K same engine, prop and pipe.
What is faster, a quickie 500 type airframe or a diamond dust?
In other words what would be a more slippery airframe?
Just interested, as we have a plyon racing class that says as long as it has a front intake and side exhaust engine, you can race it. (most cheap 46 type engine, e.g OS 46 AX, Rossi 45) Which of these two engines would be faster with a standard 10x6 prop. Rossi would be fitted with an ENYA exhaust pipe.
Currently competing with a Sonic 500 ARF, but have a dust airframe in a box. Hmmmmmm
Two many variables
Cheers
What is faster, a quickie 500 type airframe or a diamond dust?
In other words what would be a more slippery airframe?
Just interested, as we have a plyon racing class that says as long as it has a front intake and side exhaust engine, you can race it. (most cheap 46 type engine, e.g OS 46 AX, Rossi 45) Which of these two engines would be faster with a standard 10x6 prop. Rossi would be fitted with an ENYA exhaust pipe.
Currently competing with a Sonic 500 ARF, but have a dust airframe in a box. Hmmmmmm
Two many variables
Cheers
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Arvada,
CO
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Q-500 versus Diamond dust
The Diamond Dust might be faster in a long, straight pass, but if you'll be turning around poles (which is what pylon racing is) you definitely want the Q500. There is no way that a Diamond Dust can match the Quickie's turning ability.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Q-500 versus Diamond dust
Dispite the delta airfoil losing speed in a turn I would put my money on the Dust. I have flown my Dust against several q-500 planes and it was no contest. Going around the poles at low altitude will require very small control throws and a good pilot.
#6
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kortessem, BELGIUM
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
11 Posts
RE: Q-500 versus Diamond dust
I would say DD too... providing you don't yank it to death . With enough elevator throw you could loose like 50 mph in one 180° turn, but it doesn't have to be like that.
Also, with some extreme engine (not an FX obviously) a DD could become REALLY fast... I don't know how much faster a Q500 plane could go....
Let's say it's toss up...
Interesting to hear the result on this one...
Also, with some extreme engine (not an FX obviously) a DD could become REALLY fast... I don't know how much faster a Q500 plane could go....
Let's say it's toss up...
Interesting to hear the result on this one...
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver Island,
BC, CANADA
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Q-500 versus Diamond dust
We just had are need for speed this past weekend.The president of are club had a one way pass with a clipped wing Diamond Dust at 180mp,powered with a MVVS FAI 40.The second fastest Dust had a one way pass of a 165mph, with a K@B 40.The Q500's were averaging 135to 140mph, but their turning ability is awesome, they got faster with every turn.Unforunately this is a one year event due to noise restrictions, but what a blast to see these kind of speeds.Chris.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tucson,
AZ
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Q-500 versus Diamond dust
A Q-500 with a Nelson or Jett front intake side exhaust engine will be very hard to beat around the pylons. About the only other thing that can beat it is a QM40 ship. Pylon racing planes are a lot like Indycars in that they are designed with excellent turning capabilities. The Diamond Dust would be more like a top fuel dragster