How about a contest?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Alamos,
NM
If for nothing else than bragging rights.
Two simple rules:
1. single propeller driven aircraft
2. must use glow fuel
any engine and airframe combination.
Top speed must be verified by radar and a photo posted, preferably with a police officer holding the radar gun. A photo of the plane and some specs would be good too.
We could pick a date as the deadline for all submissions.
What do you think?
Two simple rules:
1. single propeller driven aircraft
2. must use glow fuel
any engine and airframe combination.
Top speed must be verified by radar and a photo posted, preferably with a police officer holding the radar gun. A photo of the plane and some specs would be good too.
We could pick a date as the deadline for all submissions.
What do you think?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Laterriere, QC, CANADA
Looks fun but some people will have hard time to find police gun radar and that take the good one. This week end a friend of mine came to our field on my demand. but the 'standard' gun that he came with was 'peaked' at 200km/h. he will be back in a couple of weeks with the laser one.
I see so much 'hyp' here about speed of plane and frankly some people will be desapointed with the 'true' speed of their arplanes.
For myself i have a good comparaison. On guys at my field club was clocked at 326km/h with his DF Panthere. And this week end when i tried for the first time my DD-Jett Q500 combo i see in a minute that i will not be as fast as him and by a good margin. i dont need a radar gun to comfirm it. I'm about 170-180mph not at 204mph like the Panthere was.
I see so much 'hyp' here about speed of plane and frankly some people will be desapointed with the 'true' speed of their arplanes.
For myself i have a good comparaison. On guys at my field club was clocked at 326km/h with his DF Panthere. And this week end when i tried for the first time my DD-Jett Q500 combo i see in a minute that i will not be as fast as him and by a good margin. i dont need a radar gun to comfirm it. I'm about 170-180mph not at 204mph like the Panthere was.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodford,
VA
if you want to get precise throw the radar gun away they're junk
do it the way the pros do it go mark off 500 ft. and get a stop
watch. you won't see a radar gun down at the drag strip but you'll see a watch.
do it the way the pros do it go mark off 500 ft. and get a stop
watch. you won't see a radar gun down at the drag strip but you'll see a watch.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Laterriere, QC, CANADA
Sorry but i think the human factor in your methode should make it kind of imprecise...Police radar gun are precise unit within +-2mph or so....We dont see radar gun neer field 'cause a good one cost about 1000$.....watch and paint mark 20 bucks..
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Alamos,
NM
We have had the local police stop by and radar our combat planes. Their guns are more sensetive than the under $100 versions. We have tried a cheap one or two and they can't seem to pick up the small planes.
The only reason I mentioned the police, or sherriff or state cop for that matter, was to get an objective third party involved. Might eliminate some creative cheating.
I would agree that most planes probably go slower than what we think they are doing.
Last time I was at a drag strip they where using electronic timing, light beams and reflectors.
Anyway, do you all think its possible?
The only reason I mentioned the police, or sherriff or state cop for that matter, was to get an objective third party involved. Might eliminate some creative cheating.
I would agree that most planes probably go slower than what we think they are doing.
Last time I was at a drag strip they where using electronic timing, light beams and reflectors.
Anyway, do you all think its possible?
#6
I have mentioned this before in this forum, but the best RC speed contests I ever saw were run here in the MidSouth several years ago. The contests were run by the Memphis Propbusters (my club) and the Whitehaven Taildraggers.
We did not use radar guns. Instead, we used a system in which there were two tripod mounted precision calibrated tracking arms. The tracking arms triggered a stopwatch which recorded the time. Of course, the setup was run over a 'closed' course. You could dive as much as you wanted before the 'trap', but your run through the trap had to be level, and judges were there to make sure
I think the idea of a 'proxy by internet' RC speed contest is a great idea, but you might want to consider having different classes by different displacements just like the Ukie guys do it.
(personally, I have 1/2A, 15size, and 40size planes that are well suited, and I imagine that other people have a wide variety of planes as well)
If you get any prizes for the contest, I think you better find a more consistent way to measure the speed than different Radar guns all around the country. The Speed trap idea would be much more accurate, but also difficult to make consistent all around the country/world.
Matchlessaero- AKA former Tortoise Award Winner at the 1990 Memphis Propbusters "Mr. Speed" Competition
Go Fast.......Turn
... Oops, don't turn, Just Go Fast
We did not use radar guns. Instead, we used a system in which there were two tripod mounted precision calibrated tracking arms. The tracking arms triggered a stopwatch which recorded the time. Of course, the setup was run over a 'closed' course. You could dive as much as you wanted before the 'trap', but your run through the trap had to be level, and judges were there to make sure
I think the idea of a 'proxy by internet' RC speed contest is a great idea, but you might want to consider having different classes by different displacements just like the Ukie guys do it.
(personally, I have 1/2A, 15size, and 40size planes that are well suited, and I imagine that other people have a wide variety of planes as well)
If you get any prizes for the contest, I think you better find a more consistent way to measure the speed than different Radar guns all around the country. The Speed trap idea would be much more accurate, but also difficult to make consistent all around the country/world.
Matchlessaero- AKA former Tortoise Award Winner at the 1990 Memphis Propbusters "Mr. Speed" Competition
Go Fast.......Turn
... Oops, don't turn, Just Go Fast
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pampa, TX
I think that people just obsess with the number...I just like the experience. I can measure my RPM, and my prop, and I guess that's good enough for me.
And the chances of me getting a policeman to park on the runway while I dive at him are mega slim. :stupid:
And I don't see how a person standing between 2 points 500 ft apart could accurately tell when the plane passed each point..even if you had a guy wave a flag at each end I don't know....seems like a pretty good margin for error.
So I guess you'll have to have the contest without me....seems like quite a bit of hassle over nothing more than ego and bragging rights. Now if money was involved
And the chances of me getting a policeman to park on the runway while I dive at him are mega slim. :stupid:
And I don't see how a person standing between 2 points 500 ft apart could accurately tell when the plane passed each point..even if you had a guy wave a flag at each end I don't know....seems like a pretty good margin for error.
So I guess you'll have to have the contest without me....seems like quite a bit of hassle over nothing more than ego and bragging rights. Now if money was involved
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Alamos,
NM
I live in a small town, and we as a club approached our loal PD and asked if they could radar some of our planes at a contest, they agreed. Granted, in a small town they are not that busy. The next time we asked they just lent us the gun. All you have to do is ask, whats the worst they can say, "no".
Someone in your club or a friend of a friend must know a cop. Offer them lunch or something.
The only other rule I would add is no diving to gain speed.
As far as classes, I think to keep it simple at first we should not divide things up. Just the fastest prop driven plane on glow fuel. Maybe RCU could donate a prize, but in my experience the quickest way to ruin an event is to offer a prize, especially money.
I am suprised the AMA doesn't have an event like this in their rule book, they have r/c pylon and control line speed and racing already.
Whether this ends up being a contest or not, I'd like to see some radar speeds posted here just to see what some of the plane/engine combos are capable of. To be honest I think we have reached the peak of performance from the currently available engines.
Someone in your club or a friend of a friend must know a cop. Offer them lunch or something.
The only other rule I would add is no diving to gain speed.
As far as classes, I think to keep it simple at first we should not divide things up. Just the fastest prop driven plane on glow fuel. Maybe RCU could donate a prize, but in my experience the quickest way to ruin an event is to offer a prize, especially money.
I am suprised the AMA doesn't have an event like this in their rule book, they have r/c pylon and control line speed and racing already.
Whether this ends up being a contest or not, I'd like to see some radar speeds posted here just to see what some of the plane/engine combos are capable of. To be honest I think we have reached the peak of performance from the currently available engines.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: columbus, OR,
I would be very interesting to see what setups perform and what the cost is. Is it really worth it to risk a 400 dollar nelson when an mvvs might do almost as well? I would like to see setups(engine,prop,pipe),tach rpms,total estimated value, and radar speeds. Also how much work is involved in getting it to run properly. With my ys its set it and forget it tuning. With my jett fires i resorted to inflight mixture. The nelson will fly this weekend if the hurricane doesnt rain me out. I'll post my data.
#13
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: stonewall, MB
heres a better idea, everyone put their knowledge and power together and make a superfast plane. i guess the fastest would be turbine. i dunno if ducted fan is faster than prop though.
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pampa, TX
But this is the Prop Plane forum..I'm sure the jet jockeys would be more than willing to listen to any ideas you might have.
Although I'm not sure a "contest" between people not at the same event could ever produce any meaningful results, I do think that the $$/MPH figures would be a surprise to many.
Although I'm not sure a "contest" between people not at the same event could ever produce any meaningful results, I do think that the $$/MPH figures would be a surprise to many.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tallahassee, FL
Here's a destructive idea...
1) Weigh the aircraft before flight
2) Find an object that will displace when hit with your airplane
3) Weigh that object (the target)
4) Execute the Kamakazi mission
5) Measure the displacement of the target after impact
6) calculate the engery to displace the target the measured distance of displacement
7) calculate the velocity of the aircraft at impact
LOL!
1) Weigh the aircraft before flight
2) Find an object that will displace when hit with your airplane
3) Weigh that object (the target)
4) Execute the Kamakazi mission
5) Measure the displacement of the target after impact
6) calculate the engery to displace the target the measured distance of displacement
7) calculate the velocity of the aircraft at impact
LOL!
#16

My Feedback: (10)
Originally posted by jlong34016
gps has been discussed and is not a viable option.bob forienze has a device for remote display onboard air speed indicator that will be available soon.
gps has been discussed and is not a viable option.bob forienze has a device for remote display onboard air speed indicator that will be available soon.
#17
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: columbus, OR,
gps was discussed here before and the accuracy was determined to be unacceptable. Depends on number of satellites used, interval of data points, ect. Was the 304 verified by another method? How accurate is the positioning? If its sensitivity is only within 20 feet then you have 10% error. I dont claim to be an expert. I dont own a jetcat turbine that has this function built in. But with the short time these planes are traveling at these speeds i question the accuracy.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: oberndorf, AUSTRIA
GPS:
accuracy is not an issue at all. you can put it on your bicycle, or in your car or whereever you want, it will display the correct speed.
it safes the max speed. but from time to time you will find that the speed displayed cannot be a correct value.
so the only thing you have to do, is to do several runs and to eliminate the slowest and fastest readings (if necessary!!)
many pilots in the full size flying scene use these devices. so figure out by your own, if they are accurate enough.
however disadvantages are the costs, weight and size.
mec
accuracy is not an issue at all. you can put it on your bicycle, or in your car or whereever you want, it will display the correct speed.
it safes the max speed. but from time to time you will find that the speed displayed cannot be a correct value.
so the only thing you have to do, is to do several runs and to eliminate the slowest and fastest readings (if necessary!!)
many pilots in the full size flying scene use these devices. so figure out by your own, if they are accurate enough.
however disadvantages are the costs, weight and size.
mec
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: columbus, OR,
Sounds like gps in not only inaccurate but inprecise as well. Throw out any value that does seem right? Voodoo. Full size planes travel at the same velosity for hundreds of miles and i find no problem with gps in that application. But an rc plane may travel at constant velosity for a few seconds, especially at 300+ mph.
#21

My Feedback: (10)
Originally posted by jlong34016
Sounds like gps in not only inaccurate but inprecise as well. Throw out any value that does seem right? Voodoo. Full size planes travel at the same velosity for hundreds of miles and i find no problem with gps in that application. But an rc plane may travel at constant velosity for a few seconds, especially at 300+ mph.
Sounds like gps in not only inaccurate but inprecise as well. Throw out any value that does seem right? Voodoo. Full size planes travel at the same velosity for hundreds of miles and i find no problem with gps in that application. But an rc plane may travel at constant velosity for a few seconds, especially at 300+ mph.
GPS is used to guide precision munitions now. They accelerate at 1 G
#22
I still think this is a neat idea, in fact, I thought it was so cool, that I will be the first to enter.......
I pushed my Caliente Unlimited half-A pylon racer through the traps at 91MPH as read from the Shelby County Sherrif's radar gun.
I know its only 91MPH, but keep in mind that this plane is powered by an .049 engine(turning around 26K on the ground) and only weighs 12 ounces......
for more check this thread in the half-A forum
http://www.rcuniverse.com/showthread...89&forumid=161]
I pushed my Caliente Unlimited half-A pylon racer through the traps at 91MPH as read from the Shelby County Sherrif's radar gun.
I know its only 91MPH, but keep in mind that this plane is powered by an .049 engine(turning around 26K on the ground) and only weighs 12 ounces......
for more check this thread in the half-A forum
http://www.rcuniverse.com/showthread...89&forumid=161]
#23
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Alamos,
NM
Sorry but you will have to do it again.
We need to see a photo of the radar gun to be official.
Police radar guns are calibrated several times a year, so using different guns in different parts of the country shouldn't be an issue.
I am really surprised the AMA doesn't have an event like this. Even if it started years ago with stop watches and progressed to radar or GPS. What would the AMA require to start an event like this? Would there have to be a SIG?
I wonder if the transponder system the R/C car racers use could be adapted some how?
We need to see a photo of the radar gun to be official.Police radar guns are calibrated several times a year, so using different guns in different parts of the country shouldn't be an issue.
I am really surprised the AMA doesn't have an event like this. Even if it started years ago with stop watches and progressed to radar or GPS. What would the AMA require to start an event like this? Would there have to be a SIG?
I wonder if the transponder system the R/C car racers use could be adapted some how?



