.35AX
#6
RE: .35AX
ORIGINAL: evan-RCU
Everyone is complaining about it but no one has bought one..... That's not very fair.
Everyone is complaining about it but no one has bought one..... That's not very fair.
Mark
#7
Thread Starter
RE: .35AX
I understand but until someone we all trust gets one and gives us an opinion we don't really know how it performs.
My question STILL is "Anyone try the new OS .35 yet?"
My question STILL is "Anyone try the new OS .35 yet?"
#8
Thread Starter
RE: .35AX
If someone does buy one and posts that it turns a 8X8 26k rpms on 10% the price won't matter will it?
But then no one will believe the person anyway....
But then no one will believe the person anyway....
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: .35AX
There has been a few threads about the larger AX engines performing quite well. One was unloading well beyond the manufactures specs and was confirmed with Doppler. The price may be high but we do need a couple of people to test them.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Merced, Ca.,
CA
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: .35AX
Evan-rcu:
There are two of the new OS's in the club on vipers. Naturally, the Jett 35 will lap them two times in a 10 lap heat in the same airframe. The Webra 35 is only good for one lap in the same race. Don't think they pull rpm's as well as the old 32, but it obviously has more torque. My 2 cents. ENJOY ( admit not a OS fan)
There are two of the new OS's in the club on vipers. Naturally, the Jett 35 will lap them two times in a 10 lap heat in the same airframe. The Webra 35 is only good for one lap in the same race. Don't think they pull rpm's as well as the old 32, but it obviously has more torque. My 2 cents. ENJOY ( admit not a OS fan)