S9202 Where's the Beef?
11-23-2002 | 12:29 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: rochester , MN,
S9202 Where's the Beef?
S9202 Servo:
AMCROSS says;
S9202 kg*cm in*oz transit time
6V: 7.9 109.0 0.21
4.8V 6.5 90.3 0.26
Futaba web site says;
S9202 69.5 in/oz no voltage listed .22 transit time
Tower Hobbies says;
S9202 Torque: 90.3 oz/in @ 4.8V - 109 oz/in @6V .26 transit time
Servo City says;
4.8VDC: 55.2oz-in. (3.96 kg-cm) .24 transit time
An earlier post had this download you could get with the most recent "Updated" specs.
From Excel;
S9202 90.1 in/oz @ 6 volts
109.5 @ 4.8 volts
Would the real S9202 specs "PLEASE STAND UP" !!!
AMCROSS says;
S9202 kg*cm in*oz transit time
6V: 7.9 109.0 0.21
4.8V 6.5 90.3 0.26
Futaba web site says;
S9202 69.5 in/oz no voltage listed .22 transit time
Tower Hobbies says;
S9202 Torque: 90.3 oz/in @ 4.8V - 109 oz/in @6V .26 transit time
Servo City says;
4.8VDC: 55.2oz-in. (3.96 kg-cm) .24 transit time
An earlier post had this download you could get with the most recent "Updated" specs.
From Excel;
S9202 90.1 in/oz @ 6 volts
109.5 @ 4.8 volts
Would the real S9202 specs "PLEASE STAND UP" !!!
11-23-2002 | 01:22 AM
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tuscola,
IL
S9202 Where's the Beef?
Pemnuts,
the futaba web chart is being replaced as discussed earlier. Futaba has recently updated all their specs following our investigation into the confusion from spring. The specs in the spreadsheet, and the tower pages, less the S9202 on the spreadsheet, are the new adn accurate data.
as stated in my prior post, the info provided from Futaba for the S9202 was in error, (data in wrong columns) and was corrected to the later figures I provided you, which are also what is on tower's site.
AMCROSS says;
S9202 kg*cm in*oz transit time
6V: 7.9 109.0 0.21
4.8V 6.5 90.3 0.26
the futaba web chart is being replaced as discussed earlier. Futaba has recently updated all their specs following our investigation into the confusion from spring. The specs in the spreadsheet, and the tower pages, less the S9202 on the spreadsheet, are the new adn accurate data.
as stated in my prior post, the info provided from Futaba for the S9202 was in error, (data in wrong columns) and was corrected to the later figures I provided you, which are also what is on tower's site.
AMCROSS says;
S9202 kg*cm in*oz transit time
6V: 7.9 109.0 0.21
4.8V 6.5 90.3 0.26
