Engine Options
#26
So DLE has been turning their name around it seems, what about the cases of plugs blowing out? Chalk that up to cross threading or over tightening? Also I have heard of the flat surfaces not being machined as smooth as they should. Can anyone else give input on this?
#27
There are two schools of thought on engines here, the IMAC 3D crowd and the War Bird crowd. I'm a War Bird guy. For me engine weight is a non factor since I almost always need nose weight. My engines of choice are Zenoah, all the Sachs based engines, (Brisons, Fox, FPE, etc) and if I can find them Quadras (65, 75, 100) Reliability is number one and that is where you get into trouble with a heavily wing loaded War Bird. Weight is almost a religion with the IMAC and 3D guys so they prefer the lighter DA, DLE, ZDZ type engines. As for performance, a well tuned, PROPERLY PROPPED G-62 will haul your planes with plenty of authority. By properly propped I mean not propped for aerobatics but for speed. Example-my 27 pound TF 47 with a stock magneto G-62 needs little to no nose weight. Propped with a Menz 22X8 it flies just fine, put a Zinger (OH MY GOD) 20X8X14 or a Bolly 21X10 prop on it and it turns into a monster.
One of my friends had a TF giant 51 with a stock g-62 and a Carbon fiber 20X10 prop, turned around 7200 on the ground in Denver @ 5200 feet. Unloaded in the air and blew right by the same plane with a ZDZ 80. The pilot would not believe it when he was told it was a G-62. Our War Bird group here in Pueblo, (elevation 5,000') are all former quarter midget and F-1 guys so we understand the value of finding the right prop for an engine. I guess what I am saying is don't overlook so call "old heavy engines" As to the DLE, we've seen lots come and go,
good power, look nice, cheap, horrible metallurgy at times, spotting reliability, wear out much quicker than the DA's they were copied from. You get what you pay for, simple as that.
As to the other "alphabet engines" from China they are much more spotting and the metallurgy and machine work sometimes make you almost cry. But, they are cheap and if that's you're number one criteria go for it.



Here's some pics from one of our recent events. The four 47s were powered by , left to right 3w 75(i think) sachs 4.2, Brison 5.8 and a DA 100.
two are Ziroli, one TF and one Vailly. Pilots left to right, CD Duane Pisciotta, Clark Graves, Doug Knowlton, Brent Cozzolino, Ken Montblat and Zach Cozzolino. The second photo is a TF corsair kit powered by an old (very old ) orange case sachs 4.2 and the third is a Ziroli with a Brison 5.8
Guess which one is fastest? If you said the Corsair your right! Very old Sachs 4.2 cut from a chainsaw in the early 90's, propped with a Menz 22X10 but runs really well with a TF 22X10. Weight is right at 30lbs so it's no feather weight.
Larry
Larry
One of my friends had a TF giant 51 with a stock g-62 and a Carbon fiber 20X10 prop, turned around 7200 on the ground in Denver @ 5200 feet. Unloaded in the air and blew right by the same plane with a ZDZ 80. The pilot would not believe it when he was told it was a G-62. Our War Bird group here in Pueblo, (elevation 5,000') are all former quarter midget and F-1 guys so we understand the value of finding the right prop for an engine. I guess what I am saying is don't overlook so call "old heavy engines" As to the DLE, we've seen lots come and go,
good power, look nice, cheap, horrible metallurgy at times, spotting reliability, wear out much quicker than the DA's they were copied from. You get what you pay for, simple as that.
As to the other "alphabet engines" from China they are much more spotting and the metallurgy and machine work sometimes make you almost cry. But, they are cheap and if that's you're number one criteria go for it.
Here's some pics from one of our recent events. The four 47s were powered by , left to right 3w 75(i think) sachs 4.2, Brison 5.8 and a DA 100.
two are Ziroli, one TF and one Vailly. Pilots left to right, CD Duane Pisciotta, Clark Graves, Doug Knowlton, Brent Cozzolino, Ken Montblat and Zach Cozzolino. The second photo is a TF corsair kit powered by an old (very old ) orange case sachs 4.2 and the third is a Ziroli with a Brison 5.8
Guess which one is fastest? If you said the Corsair your right! Very old Sachs 4.2 cut from a chainsaw in the early 90's, propped with a Menz 22X10 but runs really well with a TF 22X10. Weight is right at 30lbs so it's no feather weight.
Larry
Larry
#28

My Feedback: (8)
There's a rumor going around about a new DLE 61, but that is what it is just a rumor.
But am still leaning towards a DA 60 though my source says it is a shaker.
Just depends on the views of the owner, I guess. The old quandry still stands "Fifty Dollar Saddle on a Ten Dollar Horse ?"
Just depends.
Cheers All
But am still leaning towards a DA 60 though my source says it is a shaker.
Just depends on the views of the owner, I guess. The old quandry still stands "Fifty Dollar Saddle on a Ten Dollar Horse ?"
Just depends.
Cheers All
Last edited by GSNut; 02-19-2014 at 11:00 AM. Reason: spelling
#30

My Feedback: (19)
There's a rumor going around about a new DLE 61, but that is what it is just a rumor.
But am still leaning towards a DA 60 though my source says it is a shaker.
Just depends on the views of the owner, I guess. The old quandry still stands "Fifty Dollar Saddle on a Ten Dollar Horse ?"
Just depends.
Cheers All
But am still leaning towards a DA 60 though my source says it is a shaker.
Just depends on the views of the owner, I guess. The old quandry still stands "Fifty Dollar Saddle on a Ten Dollar Horse ?"
Just depends.
Cheers All
It looks to be a pretty good engine. They have changed the cylinder design away from the open porting the 55 used which should reduce or eliminate any premature piston wear some of the 55's experienced.
Last edited by Truckracer; 02-19-2014 at 11:25 AM.
#32
#34

My Feedback: (1)
When looking for an engine, you need to decide what is the most important issue for your application? If you need a small footprint, far and away DLE is on top there, with rear intake, rear exhaust, and angled plugs.
I actually prefer mag engines and spring starters, so when they fit, I like Zenoah. The side carbs pose problems with my warbird projects though. Although I do have a 90 degree manifold for my G62 that lays it flat on the side of the engine.
#36
For narrow cowled engines with tapered bottoms rising to the prop shaft a longer nose on the engine helps to keep the engine inside the cowl. Rear exhaust and carb really help keep the engine narrow. The designer had the giant scale mustang in mind when he designed the engine.
http://www.rc-revolution.com/engine_r50c.htm
http://www.rc-revolution.com/engine_r50c.htm
#39
There are two schools of thought on engines here, the IMAC 3D crowd and the War Bird crowd. I'm a War Bird guy. For me engine weight is a non factor since I almost always need nose weight. My engines of choice are Zenoah, all the Sachs based engines, (Brisons, Fox, FPE, etc) and if I can find them Quadras (65, 75, 100) Reliability is number one and that is where you get into trouble with a heavily wing loaded War Bird. Weight is almost a religion with the IMAC and 3D guys so they prefer the lighter DA, DLE, ZDZ type engines. As for performance, a well tuned, PROPERLY PROPPED G-62 will haul your planes with plenty of authority. By properly propped I mean not propped for aerobatics but for speed. Example-my 27 pound TF 47 with a stock magneto G-62 needs little to no nose weight. Propped with a Menz 22X8 it flies just fine, put a Zinger (OH MY GOD) 20X8X14 or a Bolly 21X10 prop on it and it turns into a monster.
One of my friends had a TF giant 51 with a stock g-62 and a Carbon fiber 20X10 prop, turned around 7200 on the ground in Denver @ 5200 feet. Unloaded in the air and blew right by the same plane with a ZDZ 80. The pilot would not believe it when he was told it was a G-62. Our War Bird group here in Pueblo, (elevation 5,000') are all former quarter midget and F-1 guys so we understand the value of finding the right prop for an engine. I guess what I am saying is don't overlook so call "old heavy engines" As to the DLE, we've seen lots come and go,
good power, look nice, cheap, horrible metallurgy at times, spotting reliability, wear out much quicker than the DA's they were copied from. You get what you pay for, simple as that.
As to the other "alphabet engines" from China they are much more spotting and the metallurgy and machine work sometimes make you almost cry. But, they are cheap and if that's you're number one criteria go for it.



Here's some pics from one of our recent events. The four 47s were powered by , left to right 3w 75(i think) sachs 4.2, Brison 5.8 and a DA 100.
two are Ziroli, one TF and one Vailly. Pilots left to right, CD Duane Pisciotta, Clark Graves, Doug Knowlton, Brent Cozzolino, Ken Montblat and Zach Cozzolino. The second photo is a TF corsair kit powered by an old (very old ) orange case sachs 4.2 and the third is a Ziroli with a Brison 5.8
Guess which one is fastest? If you said the Corsair your right! Very old Sachs 4.2 cut from a chainsaw in the early 90's, propped with a Menz 22X10 but runs really well with a TF 22X10. Weight is right at 30lbs so it's no feather weight.
Larry
Larry
One of my friends had a TF giant 51 with a stock g-62 and a Carbon fiber 20X10 prop, turned around 7200 on the ground in Denver @ 5200 feet. Unloaded in the air and blew right by the same plane with a ZDZ 80. The pilot would not believe it when he was told it was a G-62. Our War Bird group here in Pueblo, (elevation 5,000') are all former quarter midget and F-1 guys so we understand the value of finding the right prop for an engine. I guess what I am saying is don't overlook so call "old heavy engines" As to the DLE, we've seen lots come and go,
good power, look nice, cheap, horrible metallurgy at times, spotting reliability, wear out much quicker than the DA's they were copied from. You get what you pay for, simple as that.
As to the other "alphabet engines" from China they are much more spotting and the metallurgy and machine work sometimes make you almost cry. But, they are cheap and if that's you're number one criteria go for it.
Here's some pics from one of our recent events. The four 47s were powered by , left to right 3w 75(i think) sachs 4.2, Brison 5.8 and a DA 100.
two are Ziroli, one TF and one Vailly. Pilots left to right, CD Duane Pisciotta, Clark Graves, Doug Knowlton, Brent Cozzolino, Ken Montblat and Zach Cozzolino. The second photo is a TF corsair kit powered by an old (very old ) orange case sachs 4.2 and the third is a Ziroli with a Brison 5.8
Guess which one is fastest? If you said the Corsair your right! Very old Sachs 4.2 cut from a chainsaw in the early 90's, propped with a Menz 22X10 but runs really well with a TF 22X10. Weight is right at 30lbs so it's no feather weight.
Larry
Larry
The only thing we fly is warbirds unless its given to us.
I love to see others warbirds, it makes me want to go crazy with our already extreme fleet of planes. haha
#40

My Feedback: (1)
#41
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a DLE 55 and people are surprised at how I just flip it once for every flight, I'm telling them to let it go before they even get a strong hold of it, lol! That engine will take my plane to the stratosphere if I let it. 3W is expensive and heavy, DA's are one of the best but are also expensive. I've had Zenoahs before and I agree, no oomf!
I have a Spektrum TM1000 Telemetry with temp and RPM and it is Ideal for tweaking the engine and trying props. I have listed an extra sensor that will work with the TM1000 (for what it cost me to make) in ebay and here on RCU. If you have a TM1000 Telemetry and don't have the RPM hooked up, get it, you'll thank me for it, it works perfect and it's ready and easy to install.
I have a Spektrum TM1000 Telemetry with temp and RPM and it is Ideal for tweaking the engine and trying props. I have listed an extra sensor that will work with the TM1000 (for what it cost me to make) in ebay and here on RCU. If you have a TM1000 Telemetry and don't have the RPM hooked up, get it, you'll thank me for it, it works perfect and it's ready and easy to install.
#44
Just had two of our war bird guys get new FPE engines, 5.8. Very well made, run strong, use sachs cylinder and pistons and rods. one piece custom made crank. The engines are very beefy and comparable to Brisons in every way. The Fox is very similar. Looks like either would be a straight replacement for the Brisons. They also make 4.2 engines similar to the Brison.
Larry
Larry
#49
Go ahead, I will pay for it, do you have a paypal account. If so i will put 175.00 in it to pay for motor and shipping. If not I can send you a money order when the engine arrives so that I know how much shipping charges are. If OK I will PM you with my shipping address. Let me know
Thanks
Larry
Thanks
Larry
#50

My Feedback: (1)
Go ahead, I will pay for it, do you have a paypal account. If so i will put 175.00 in it to pay for motor and shipping. If not I can send you a money order when the engine arrives so that I know how much shipping charges are. If OK I will PM you with my shipping address. Let me know
Thanks
Larry
Thanks
Larry


