Taurus TS69
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (23)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: frisco, TX
For those who have owned this engine, would you tell me some about it? I have a taurus TS52 and it runs great with lots of power. No complaints. I want to know if the larger ones are just the same in reliability and power?
What is the weight?
How much does it vibrate? This concerns me since it is a larger single.
Thanks for the input
Craig
What is the weight?
How much does it vibrate? This concerns me since it is a larger single.
Thanks for the input
Craig
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alexandria, IN
HI Graig
I have been looking at the TS52 could you tell me a little about as far as how it runs and the weight I have a Hanger 9 Edge 540 I was thinking about putting it in or should I go glow.
Thanks Matt
I have been looking at the TS52 could you tell me a little about as far as how it runs and the weight I have a Hanger 9 Edge 540 I was thinking about putting it in or should I go glow.
Thanks Matt
#3

My Feedback: (31)
The Taurus Engines TS-69 is a growed up big brother to your TS-52. Like power and vibration. Same reciprocating assembly, albeit a bit larger.
Weight is 76ozs., cost is $655.95 with CNC radial mount, C&H Ignition shipped to your door.
I have a few examples of the 62/3.7 and a 94/5.7. I am very happy with them. Same desired attributes exhibited of the smaller Taurus Engines IMO.
The 52/3.2 weighs 53ozs. plus 2oz for the radial mount, 3.7ozs for ignition, 1.5ozs for the plug and around 7ozs for a muffler.
Weight is 76ozs., cost is $655.95 with CNC radial mount, C&H Ignition shipped to your door.
I have a few examples of the 62/3.7 and a 94/5.7. I am very happy with them. Same desired attributes exhibited of the smaller Taurus Engines IMO.
The 52/3.2 weighs 53ozs. plus 2oz for the radial mount, 3.7ozs for ignition, 1.5ozs for the plug and around 7ozs for a muffler.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (23)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: frisco, TX
Thanks Michael. Would you be so kind to give me your stats on the 62? Taurus' web page shows the 69 providing a whole 1 HP more than the 62, would you have any experience with this to verify?
Is the 3W 70 any smoother than the TS69?
Thanks
Craig
Is the 3W 70 any smoother than the TS69?
Thanks
Craig



