Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

BME 110 -vs- DA 100

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2006 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
3d-aholic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Round Rock, TX
Default BME 110 -vs- DA 100

It looks like the BME 110 is 3.9 lbs for 10.5 HP whereas the DA 100 proports 9.8Hp at 5.8lbs. It looks like the BME is better performer. Anyone run both of these on similar planes before?
Old 07-30-2006 | 02:18 PM
  #2  
flyinrazrback's Avatar
My Feedback: (69)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Smith, AR
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

I have run both. Both great performers, with the BME 110 have a little more power on top than my DA. The BME can be tricky to get a plane to balance with it, depending on the airframe you chose for it. I am right up the road from you in Temple. PS, dont pay too much attention to claimed HP numbers, they are not very accurate for our application.
Old 07-31-2006 | 08:24 PM
  #3  
bodywerks's Avatar
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,930
Received 71 Likes on 63 Posts
From: Elgin, AZ
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

Unfortunately, I can't say the same. Side-by-side, I ran my 110 with a 26X10 menz for a MAX RPM (the highest R's the engine has ever seen on the ground) of 6400. This was the first run of the day for me. I then walked 10 feet over to my buddy's plane, whic has a DA 100 on it and a Mejz 28X10. It was also his forst run up of the day, and I tached 6400 with the same tach. It was an embarassing experience[]
I can tell you that I did personally see one run prior to buying one and it seemed like quite a powerhouse, which is why I decided to purchase one.
I haven't given up on it yet, but I am very disappointed in the lack of power, especially since I get a badgering from all the DA lovers here! I love DA's, too, but my elevation (6500) convinced me to try the lighter engine. I hope that, in the long run, this thing does finally come alive so I can actually manage to get my 25.5 pound plane to climb out of a hover!
Old 07-31-2006 | 08:39 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

Wow, all I have for a 26 pound plane is a Brison 105 and there are far too many people to attest that it will pull that Giles straight up (while accelerating all the way) out of anything on even a very hot day (110 plus) at a field elevation of 1,400' msl. With a 28-10 Biela BTW. OTOH, a friends 110 beats my 105 into the dirt, so perhaps it's not the engine?[8D]
Old 08-01-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
RTK's Avatar
RTK
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Left Coast , CA
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

3d-aholic--Don't get hung up on HP numbers, they really do not mean much. (as stated before) Now if the manufacturers would give you torque/hp curves you would have something.

The 110 should spin about 100-300 better than the 100 from what I have seen and read. (both are good engines and you can't go wrong with either) Also the 110 is no longer manufactured, it has been replaced with the 115. The new 115 is "supposed" to turn about 100+ better than the 110, we will see. Not that it means anything, but my 110 will spin a mejz 28x10 at 6500 static on stock mufflers.

Silversurfer,,Was that comment about "beat it into the dirt" about the power of my 110 compared to your 105, or the fact that I did beat my plane into the dirt the last time we flew
Old 08-01-2006 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

The power, not the gardening
Old 08-01-2006 | 11:28 AM
  #7  
3d-aholic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Round Rock, TX
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

You guys have this on the WildHare Giles? Whats the best engine combo for the New WildHare Edge?
Old 08-01-2006 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: BME 110 -vs- DA 100

I can't give you the "best" because that's subjective and user determined. I would consider a very strong 80cc to 115cc twin for the plane. The lightest and most reliable will be the winner every time. At 5.5 pounds my Brison is on the heavy side and anything heavier would be worse. That includes DA and 3W. A ZDZ 80, possibly a Kroma 100, and the BME 115 when it's released ( which should be very shortly) would be my first 3 choices. The final decision would be based on what it might be needed for later.

Mstroh curently has the only flying big Edge, so he might be a good person to get in touch with via a PM through the W/H forum.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.