Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

FPE 3.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2006, 11:17 PM
  #1  
bsheridan2002
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FPE 3.2

I'm considering buying one of these engines. Are they any good? I'm new to gas and I need a 50cc powerplant.
Thanks
Old 08-05-2006, 11:29 PM
  #2  
bubbagates
My Feedback: (32)
 
bubbagates's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elizabethtown, PA
Posts: 8,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

They are a bit on the heavy side

I'd look into a ZDZ50, Da50, 3W50 or even the new 3W 55i and the Brison 3.2 I have all of these and love them all with the DA and ZDZ being broken in a well running. I can't say much about the 3w engines as they are still going through the breakin process but so far they have also been very reliable. The FPE3.2 I had was nothing but problems and spent loads of time back at the manufacturer and it got to the point that I did not trust it so it's sitting out on the workshop.

ZDZ can be found at the following link.

http://www.rcshowcase.com/

I get my Da engine from Troy Built Models though you can get them right from Desert Aircraft

http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/

http://www.desertaircraft.com

I get my 3W engines from Aircraft International

http://www.aircraftinternational.com/

All three have been excellent for customer service

Old 08-05-2006, 11:51 PM
  #3  
bsheridan2002
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

Thanks Bubba. was your fpe an older one? do you know if your poor experience was typical?
Old 08-06-2006, 06:33 AM
  #4  
ljones5000
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

I have a FPE 3.2 on a SIG Sundancer biplane and it is a really, really good engine. It starts easily, runs great at all speeds, instant transtion, steady idle, etc. I run a Bolly wood 22X8 prop and it's been a while since I tached it but my recollection is that it turns about 6700rpm...that might not be the right number as I pay more attention to how it flys my plane than rpm. It flys the crap out of my Sundancer.

The only problem I had was when it was new it took a while to break-in and it sputtered and popped some, as in rich. After breaking in, it never misses a beat.

Larry
Old 08-06-2006, 08:51 AM
  #5  
Bob Laine
My Feedback: (91)
 
Bob Laine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: FPE 3.2

ljones5000 Do a search on the "Taurus" line of engines. They are without a doubt the most respected engine on the market. And......They are Peerless, in the 50cc market. Or, consider a getting one of Ralph Cunninghams, "Super lite" Zenoah, G62's. I have one and I'd put it up against any other engine in it's class. Bob
Old 08-06-2006, 11:19 AM
  #6  
rcbill
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pleasant prairie, WI
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

I have the FPE 3.2 engine. It's a very good engine although the DA 50 spools up faster.......Bill
Old 08-06-2006, 10:50 PM
  #7  
excaliber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: metropolis, ANTARCTICA
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

bsheridan2002. echo b. laine's comment about the Taurus. you might pay a few bucks more, but its worth it for the quality and performance.
Old 08-07-2006, 06:23 AM
  #8  
ljones5000
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2


ORIGINAL: Bob Laine

ljones5000 Do a search on the "Taurus" line of engines. They are without a doubt the most respected engine on the market. And......They are Peerless, in the 50cc market. Or, consider a getting one of Ralph Cunninghams, "Super lite" Zenoah, G62's. I have one and I'd put it up against any other engine in it's class. Bob
I already own the FPE and was only answering bsheridan2002 who asked about the FPE. Bob, have you ever owned a FPE? From your comment I guess you've owned both. Mine runs good but I have never put it in competition with any other.

I have long admired the Taurus simply from reading the forum and many good comments but I have never seen one. If anyone at our field has one, i'm not aware. If I needed a 3.2, I'd certainly consider a Taurus.

Larry
Old 08-07-2006, 07:56 AM
  #9  
Bob Laine
My Feedback: (91)
 
Bob Laine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: FPE 3.2

ljones5000....In all honesty I have to admit that the "First Place," engine is the only engine I've never owned. However I have seen others use them at different flying fields, and they all seemed to run OK, and I've never heard any negative comments about them. Bob
Old 08-07-2006, 06:11 PM
  #10  
bsheridan2002
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

Thanks for the info. I have a chance to buy one at $350. I need a 50 for a biplane project. plane should be about 16 lbs. I like to dabble in 3d but I'm not hard core (if I was, I think i would pay the extra money for a DA.
Old 08-07-2006, 10:02 PM
  #11  
Rcpilot
My Feedback: (78)
 
Rcpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,808
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

I could be wrong, but I thought the FPE 3.2, Brison 3.2 and Fox 3.2 were all the same cylinder and piston from a Sachs based engine.

?? [:-]

They should all run about the same. Cantilever crankshaft. Machined aluminum crankcase. Sachs cylinder, rod, and piston. Walbro carb. Run it with 40:1 fuel for 5 or 6 gallons and then switch to synthetic if you think it's necessary. I don't run synthetics. I just run them on 40:1 untill I crash them. But, just do whatever you feel confortable with.

So, are they all Sachs based jugs and pistons--or does Brison, Fox and FPE all make their own cylinders that are unique to their engine?

I have a Fox 3.2 and a friend has the FPE 3.2 They look darn near identical. I'd almost swear the cylinders were identical. Just some slight differences in the crankcase machining.
Old 08-07-2006, 10:11 PM
  #12  
Antique
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Antique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere, DC
Posts: 9,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: FPE 3.2

Look on the base of the cylinder, a Sachs will have ZN44 something cast into it..I think the FPE is a Husqvarna.
Cantilever crank engines don't use chainsaw rods. The rod is sold as part of the crank. It would be too expensive to take a high dollar chainsaw crank apart just to get the rod and bearing...
DA and A&M found this out the hard way...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.