Brison 2.4
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Harriman,
TN
My crank or rod broke on mine today, it only had at the most ten gallons of fuel through it. It is still under warranty so I am going to call Brison tomorrow. Anyone else had this problem before. Thanks James
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Harriman,
TN
Well that makes me feel some better. I don't think I have done nothing to hurt the engine I ran Bell-ray MC-1 at 50-1 and ran a Mejzlik 20/10 prop. I like their engines I also have a new 5.8.
#6
Senior Member
Hey Walton,
What RPM are you getting on the Mejzlik 20X10? I run the same prop on my Brison 2.4 and I am getting only about 6800. Does that seem right? Thanks.
What RPM are you getting on the Mejzlik 20X10? I run the same prop on my Brison 2.4 and I am getting only about 6800. Does that seem right? Thanks.
#9
Senior Member
Thanks Walton/Krayzc,
At least I know that my Brison is not too far off the mark. I bolted on a Menz Ultra 20X10 today and got a 100 RPM increase. The 100 RPM made some noticable difference but I am still left wanting. Guess I need a slighty larger engine for my plane. (Dave Patrick Extra 330L) Maybe a 44 or 50 cc.
At least I know that my Brison is not too far off the mark. I bolted on a Menz Ultra 20X10 today and got a 100 RPM increase. The 100 RPM made some noticable difference but I am still left wanting. Guess I need a slighty larger engine for my plane. (Dave Patrick Extra 330L) Maybe a 44 or 50 cc.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
I run an APC 20x10 on my Giles 202 and I get 7300 rpm with mine. I have another 2.4 on a PW Extra but I have not measured the RPM yet. I am running a 21x8NX prop on that engine/plane
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
What muffler are you using.
The BCM seems to do better than the slimline or the stock muffler.
The BCM seems to do better than the slimline or the stock muffler.
Originally posted by On_Final
Hey Walton,
What RPM are you getting on the Mejzlik 20X10? I run the same prop on my Brison 2.4 and I am getting only about 6800. Does that seem right? Thanks.
Hey Walton,
What RPM are you getting on the Mejzlik 20X10? I run the same prop on my Brison 2.4 and I am getting only about 6800. Does that seem right? Thanks.
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
BCM stands for Bisson Custom Mufflers.
http://bissonmufflers.com/en/index.html
Take their standard muffler and remove the tips of the pipes.
Ugly but good!
http://bissonmufflers.com/en/index.html
Take their standard muffler and remove the tips of the pipes.
Ugly but good!
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Harriman,
TN
I talked to Harvey at Brison this evening he took the engine apart and said the crank shaft was broke, and he looked it all over and could not find a obvious cause. The good news is that he is going to fix it for free, and all I am going to have to pay for is shipping. I think this is a good company to deal with.
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
WHen I removed my tips, I got 200 more rpm (7200 to 7400). I am assuming it has something to do with the tips being rounded in. It did make it a little louder but quieter than the standard muffler.
#20
Senior Member
Wood,
I tried three different 20X8 sized props. All were wood props.
Menz-S : Didn't get to measure the RPM on this prop but it pulled pretty good. Broke it on the first flight when I ran out of fuel and the plane didn't quite make it back. (the vent line got bent down. What I thought was a full tank turned out to be only a quarter tank)
Top-Flight Powertip : I got only 6600 on this prop. Performance was pretty dismal. Anyone wants to buy two cheap? They have been balanced too!
MasterAirscrew Simitar : 7600 rpm on this prop. Performance was good but decided to take it off as I consider that over revved for this engine.
I tried three different 20X8 sized props. All were wood props.
Menz-S : Didn't get to measure the RPM on this prop but it pulled pretty good. Broke it on the first flight when I ran out of fuel and the plane didn't quite make it back. (the vent line got bent down. What I thought was a full tank turned out to be only a quarter tank)
Top-Flight Powertip : I got only 6600 on this prop. Performance was pretty dismal. Anyone wants to buy two cheap? They have been balanced too!
MasterAirscrew Simitar : 7600 rpm on this prop. Performance was good but decided to take it off as I consider that over revved for this engine.
#21
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
I would not consider 7600 rpm as overrev.
If I am not mistaken the Mach .6 rpm for a 20 inch propeller is something like 8000 rpm.
I would say use it and enjoy!
If I am not mistaken the Mach .6 rpm for a 20 inch propeller is something like 8000 rpm.
I would say use it and enjoy!
Originally posted by On_Final
Wood,
I tried three different 20X8 sized props. All were wood props.
MasterAirscrew Simitar : 7600 rpm on this prop. Performance was good but decided to take it off as I consider that over revved for this engine.
Wood,
I tried three different 20X8 sized props. All were wood props.
MasterAirscrew Simitar : 7600 rpm on this prop. Performance was good but decided to take it off as I consider that over revved for this engine.
#22
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mukwonago, WI,
I got 7900+ from a Zinger Pro 20-8,and this would cause a
over -rev in level flight,but it is great on up-lines and for engine
,or .prop,braking on down lines or landings...
over -rev in level flight,but it is great on up-lines and for engine
,or .prop,braking on down lines or landings...
#23
Senior Member
I just wanted to stay within Brison's reccommendation. According to Brison's owner manual, (Third page under 'Propeller') they stated that engine RPM should be kept between 6500 and 7500 RPM (Static) for best torque.
But you are right, 7600 RPM for the MA Simitar is probably still fine to use.
But you are right, 7600 RPM for the MA Simitar is probably still fine to use.
#24
I don't understand why we worry so about over reving these gas engines.... are they really that close to flying apart and overheating at the max torque rpm?? Why do we need max torque right at the max rpm?? Seems to me max torque would be more usefull down in the middle to 2/3rds of the power band where the throttle gets used more. as long as were getting the thrust we need, and are not overheating the engine, what are we hurting?
Kevin
Kevin
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hammond,
IN
My Brison 2.4 would turn a Mejzlik 20x10 @ 7100 rpm - that's open exhaust (no muffler). A ZDZ-40 (rotary valve) with a B&B muffler (?) turns the same prop @ 7600 rpm. The point is that there is free power available if you can put a less restrictive muffler on these engines. Check your rpm open exhaust and compare to your muffler - you may be surprised.




