Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2010 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
Default Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

What about direct Lipo usage (2S , 7.4v ) on current ignitions for gas engines ?
If you have two versions available , one for 4.8 NiCD/NiMh and other for LiPo 2S 7.4v , what's your choice ?

Thanks ...
Old 04-02-2010 | 05:24 PM
  #2  
apalsson's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Coffs Harbour NSW, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

Rcexl ignitions are rated 4.8V to 6.V and draw between 150mAh and 350mAh in mixed flight, depending on RPM from a 4.8V pack and approximately 25% more current from a 6V pack.
The older ones couldn't handle anything over 6 volts, or their circuitry would fail. I believe the latest versions can actually handle 5-cell NiMh / NiCd packs but draw more current.

Given the low current draw and the 6V absolute limit, I personally don't see any reason to use anyting other than a standard NiCd / NiMh 4.8V pack.
You get a very good flying day out of a battery as small as 800mAh but most use 2,000mAh Eneloop packs.

Old 04-02-2010 | 05:43 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

I know current RCEXL specifications.
I ask for preferences for the ignition battery.

Thanks
Old 04-02-2010 | 05:47 PM
  #4  
w8ye's Avatar
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 37,576
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Shelby, OH
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

Al gave you the straight talk already? I thought he answered your question?
Old 04-02-2010 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

ORIGINAL: w8ye

Al gave you the straight talk already? I thought he answered your question?

Sorry for my bad english. [] Maybe i didn't explain my question .
I know all current RCEXL ignition specifications. Many thanks to apalsson for their reply.
I'm asking what will be your choice if you can get ignitions for differents batteries.
One version for NiCd 4'8-6V AND another cdi ignition version for 6v-7.4 V

Regards
Old 04-02-2010 | 06:09 PM
  #6  
jedijody's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

It would be ideal if they could operate on anything from 4.5 to 9 volts. That covers 4 cell Nicad/Nimh through a fully charged 2 cell Lopo. I have expressed this to Xu Liang before.
Old 04-02-2010 | 06:30 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..


ORIGINAL: jedijody

It would be ideal if they could operate on anything from 4.5 to 9 volts. That covers 4 cell Nicad/Nimh through a fully charged 2 cell Lopo. I have expressed this to Xu Liang before.
Me too

Regards
Old 04-03-2010 | 09:50 AM
  #8  
pilotpete2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lyndonville, VT
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..


ORIGINAL: mpascual

I know current RCEXL specifications.
I ask for preferences for the ignition battery.

Thanks
OK, anything but a lipo for a gas powered model
There is a simple fix if you want to run a CDI ignition significantly above 6V, that is to use a regulator on the input. For a CDI ignition to work reliably from 4.8V to 8.4V reliably, it would have to have an internal regulator, there is no other way to do it. So why make the module more expensive when most users will use a battery of the correct voltage, or just use their own regulator.
Pete
Old 04-03-2010 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
gboulton's Avatar
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: La Vergne, TN
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..


ORIGINAL: mpascual
One version for NiCd 4'8-6V AND another cdi ignition version for 6v-7.4 V
I would have a strong preference for the latter.<br type="_moz" />
Old 04-03-2010 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 979
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Livermore, CA
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

Given a choice between the two, I would prefer the 4.8V version. NiCds are very reliable, very durable, inexpensive and last for years without worry.

-Ed B.
Old 04-03-2010 | 01:35 PM
  #11  
apalsson's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Coffs Harbour NSW, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

ORIGINAL: Flyfast1
Given a choice between the two, I would prefer the 4.8V version. NiCds are very reliable, very durable, inexpensive and last for years without worry.
Actually, I second that.
Also because I see little reason to use high-current release batteries like Lithium (LiPo / LiFe) to power a device that draws mere 100mAh - 350mAh in mixed use.

And ... the "single charger" argument doesn't cut it for me either because most decent modern chargers will happily charge your NiCd/NiMh ignision battery on one output while they charge your LiPo/LiFe receiver batteries through another output
Old 04-03-2010 | 01:41 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Auburn, GA
Default RE: Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..

Heck I would go for the 2 cell lipo, The ignitions are cheap enought to get replacements.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.