Direct LiPo usage on ignitions ..
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
What about direct Lipo usage (2S , 7.4v ) on current ignitions for gas engines ?
If you have two versions available , one for 4.8 NiCD/NiMh and other for LiPo 2S 7.4v , what's your choice ?
Thanks ...
If you have two versions available , one for 4.8 NiCD/NiMh and other for LiPo 2S 7.4v , what's your choice ?
Thanks ...
#2

My Feedback: (1)
Rcexl ignitions are rated 4.8V to 6.V and draw between 150mAh and 350mAh in mixed flight, depending on RPM from a 4.8V pack and approximately 25% more current from a 6V pack.
The older ones couldn't handle anything over 6 volts, or their circuitry would fail. I believe the latest versions can actually handle 5-cell NiMh / NiCd packs but draw more current.
Given the low current draw and the 6V absolute limit, I personally don't see any reason to use anyting other than a standard NiCd / NiMh 4.8V pack.
You get a very good flying day out of a battery as small as 800mAh but most use 2,000mAh Eneloop packs.
The older ones couldn't handle anything over 6 volts, or their circuitry would fail. I believe the latest versions can actually handle 5-cell NiMh / NiCd packs but draw more current.
Given the low current draw and the 6V absolute limit, I personally don't see any reason to use anyting other than a standard NiCd / NiMh 4.8V pack.
You get a very good flying day out of a battery as small as 800mAh but most use 2,000mAh Eneloop packs.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
ORIGINAL: w8ye
Al gave you the straight talk already? I thought he answered your question?
Al gave you the straight talk already? I thought he answered your question?
Sorry for my bad english. [
] Maybe i didn't explain my question .I know all current RCEXL ignition specifications. Many thanks to apalsson for their reply.
I'm asking what will be your choice if you can get ignitions for differents batteries.
One version for NiCd 4'8-6V AND another cdi ignition version for 6v-7.4 V
Regards
#6
It would be ideal if they could operate on anything from 4.5 to 9 volts. That covers 4 cell Nicad/Nimh through a fully charged 2 cell Lopo. I have expressed this to Xu Liang before.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tres Cantos, SPAIN
ORIGINAL: jedijody
It would be ideal if they could operate on anything from 4.5 to 9 volts. That covers 4 cell Nicad/Nimh through a fully charged 2 cell Lopo. I have expressed this to Xu Liang before.
It would be ideal if they could operate on anything from 4.5 to 9 volts. That covers 4 cell Nicad/Nimh through a fully charged 2 cell Lopo. I have expressed this to Xu Liang before.

Regards
#8
ORIGINAL: mpascual
I know current RCEXL specifications.
I ask for preferences for the ignition battery.
Thanks
I know current RCEXL specifications.
I ask for preferences for the ignition battery.
Thanks


There is a simple fix if you want to run a CDI ignition significantly above 6V, that is to use a regulator on the input. For a CDI ignition to work reliably from 4.8V to 8.4V reliably, it would have to have an internal regulator, there is no other way to do it. So why make the module more expensive when most users will use a battery of the correct voltage, or just use their own regulator.
Pete
#9

My Feedback: (15)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: La Vergne,
TN
ORIGINAL: mpascual
One version for NiCd 4'8-6V AND another cdi ignition version for 6v-7.4 V
One version for NiCd 4'8-6V AND another cdi ignition version for 6v-7.4 V
#11

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: Flyfast1
Given a choice between the two, I would prefer the 4.8V version. NiCds are very reliable, very durable, inexpensive and last for years without worry.
Given a choice between the two, I would prefer the 4.8V version. NiCds are very reliable, very durable, inexpensive and last for years without worry.
Also because I see little reason to use high-current release batteries like Lithium (LiPo / LiFe) to power a device that draws mere 100mAh - 350mAh in mixed use.
And ... the "single charger" argument doesn't cut it for me either because most decent modern chargers will happily charge your NiCd/NiMh ignision battery on one output while they charge your LiPo/LiFe receiver batteries through another output





